The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using linezolid

1

Enterococcus Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The present study was conducted at Vinayaka Mission's Medical College and Hospitals, Salem Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) Clearance (MICROBIOLOGY/Ph.D/01/2015) was obtained prior to this study A total of 1200 clinical samples received at the Department of Microbiology for routine culture and sensitivity were included. A total of 774 isolates of Enterococci obtained from 1200 clinical samples were processed for species identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Identification of isolates to the species level was performed by the sugar utilization test using brain heart infusion broth incorporated with 1% sugar and bromothymol blue indicator.[9 (link)] Isolates of Enterococci were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines[10 ] using the following drugs: penicillin (10 U), erythromycin (15 μg), high-level gentamicin (120 μg), linezolid (30 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and nitrofurantoin (300 μg).(Himedia Laboratories Ltd.) The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for these antibiotics were also determined bythe Vitek automated system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the identified S. aureus isolates were subjected to an in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test by employing the modified Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines [19 ]. The antimicrobial disks used were ampicillin (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (25 μg), clindamycin (31 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), erythromycin (26 μg), gentamycin (28 μg), linezolid (30 μg), oxacillin (10 μg), tetracycline (20 μg), and penicillin (10 μg) from HiMedia, India.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method with the following discs nitrofurantoin (NIT, 300 μg) for urinary isolates only and linezolid (LNZ, 30 μg) (Hi Media, India). Breakpoint MIC was performed against ampicillin (AMP) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) in MHA by agar dilution method for all the clinical isolates [9 ]. Screening for vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) and high level gentamicin resistant enterococci (HLGRE) was done on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar containing 6 μg/mL vancomycin and 500 μg/mL gentamicin, respectively, by agar dilution method [9 ]. Multidrug resistance was defined as resistance to three or more different classes of antibiotics [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the Kirby–Bauer disk-diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood for the following antimicrobial agents: penicillin (10 U), ampicillin (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), linezolid (30 µg), and vancomycin (30 µg) (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai). The inoculum for susceptibility testing and interpretation was performed as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [14 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibacterial Activity of UMB Assessed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initially, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of test antibiotics was assessed using microbroth dilution assay (CLSI, 2018 ) as described earlier. MIC is determined as minimum concentration that displayed complete visible growth inhibition of MRSE following 24 h of incubation. Then, the influence of UMB on MIC of test antibiotics was examined by Kirby–Bauer agar diffusion method. Preliminarily, the stock solutions of gentamycin, rifampicin, vancomycin, and linezolid (Hi-Media Laboratories, India) were prepared. Then, overnight culture adjusted to 0.5 McFarland was swabbed uniformly on TSA plates supplemented with and without UMB (at 500 μg/ml) using sterile cotton swabs. Further, wells of 3 mm diameter were punched at the center of the agar plates and test antibiotics at their respective MIC were added to the wells. In parallel, UMB at 500 μg/ml was also loaded in the well of a plain TSA plate, in order to evaluate its individual antibacterial effect. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, the zone diameter of antibacterial activity in control and treated plates was measured using HiAntibiotic zone scale (Hi-Media Laboratories, India) and subsequently, the plates were documented using high resolution CCD camera (GelDoc XR+, Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility of MRCoNS Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRCoNS isolates were subjected to an in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test by the disc diffusion method with the following antibiotics: gentamicin (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), co-trimoxazole (25 mcg), linezolid (30 µg) and chloramphenicol (50 µg) (HiMedia, India). The results were interpreted following the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines M100 (CLSI 2019). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin (0.125 to 64 mg/L) to the bacterial isolates was determined by agar dilution method. Briefly, colonies isolated from the overnight growth of each organism were selected to prepare direct suspensions in tryptic soy broth. The suspensions were adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Control Mueller–Hinton agar and oxacillin Mueller–Hinton agar plates were inoculated with the final suspensions of bacteria. Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of oxacillin that completely inhibited growth. erythromycin-resistant and clindamycin-susceptible isolates were also tested for inducible clindamycin resistance by D zone test [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed antimicrobial susceptibility test of the isolates by the KirbyBauer method adhering to clinical and laboratory standard institute (CLSI) guidelines against following antimicrobial discs: amikacin (10 µg), cefalexin (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), linezolid (30 µg), and teicoplanin (30 µg) (HiMedia, India). We checked the quality of all the discs by testing them against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotics discs containing amikacin (30 μg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), azithromycin (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (75/30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), cephalexin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (1 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), cloxacillin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gatifloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), linezolid (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), netilmicin (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and vancomycin (30 μg) were obtained from Himedia Laboratories (Mumbai, India) and used as per manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates of S. aureus was performed by modified Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton Agar (MHA) (HiMedia Pvt. Ltd. India), as recommended by CLSI guidelines [13 ]. Isolates were tested for susceptibility against amikacin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), linezolid (30 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), ampicillin-clavulanate (10 µg) and vancomycin (30 µg) (HiMedia Pvt. Ltd. India). The results were interpreted as per the guidelines of the CLSI zone size interpretive chart.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococcus aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using a disk-diffusion method. Briefly, the bacterial culture was calibrated to a turbidity of McFarland Standard No. 0.5 (about 1 × 108 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL) and swabbed onto Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) (HiMedia Laboratories). The plates were allowed to dry for 3 min, and an antibiotic disk was placed on the swabbed surface of the agar. The following antibiotics were tested: oxacillin(30μg), penicillin (10 U), cefoxitin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), linezolid (30 μg), and gentamicin (10 μg) (HiMedia Laboratories).
The methicillin sensitive S. aureus subsp. aureus Rosenbach (Seattle 1945) from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) No. 25923 was used as a quality control strain. Experiments were conducted and interpreted following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [14 ]. The antibiotic resistance of each isolate from the disk-diffusion test was recorded independently and multiple-antibiotic resistance (MAR) indices were calculated. The MAR index is defined as “a/b, where a represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was resistant, and b represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was exposed” [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!