The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using myc trap beads

1

Antibody Characterization for Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used in this study: M2 mouse anti-FLAG (Sigma), M2 mouse anti-FLAG-conjugated beads (Sigma), mouse anti-myc (9E10), mouse anti-GAPDH (Proteintech Group), mouse anti-GBA (MilliporeSigma), rat anti-mouse LAMP1 (BD Biosciences), rabbit anti-calnexin (Abcam) and sheep anti-mouse PGRN (R&D Systems). Rabbit anti-mouse PSAP and PGRN antibodies were produced as previously described [30 (link)]. GFP-Trap and Myc-Trap beads were from ChromoTek. 4-Methylumbelliferyl β-D-glucopyranoside (4-MU), GCase substrate, were obtained from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation of IFGGA2 and IRGM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoprecipitation of IFGGA2-GFP or IRGM-Myc was performed by GFP- or Myc-Trap beads (Chromotek) (Table S5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Affinity Purification of Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in ice-cold TNTE buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% w/v Triton X-100, 10% v/v glycerol, 1× Complete protease inhibitor (Roche), 1× PhosSTOP (Roche)). Lysates were precleared with control agarose beads (ChromoTek) for 1 h at 4 °C. GFP-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated using GFP-TRAP beads (ChromoTek) and MYC-tagged proteins with MYC-Trap beads (ChromoTek) for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed three times with TNTE (w/o PhosSTOP) and bound protein was eluted with 2× Laemmli buffer at 100 °C for 10 min before resolving by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (4–12% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gels, Life Technologies) and western blotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mitochondrial Protein Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following mitochondrial isolation, mitochondria were gently lysed using 4.5 g glyco-diosgenin (GDN)/g protein in IP buffer [0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, phospholipids (0.03 mg/ml phosphatidylethanolamine, 0.03 mg/ml phosphatidylglycerol, and 0.09 mg/ml phosphatidylcholine) and 1× cOmplete ULTRA Protease Inhibitor Cocktail]. Myc-tagged proteins were isolated using 10 µl Myc-Trap beads (per 10 cm dish; Chromotek). The supernatant (lysed mitochondrial sample) was incubated on a rotating wheel with beads overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, beads were washed in IP buffer. After washing, the supernatant was removed, and samples were analysed by western blotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoprecipitation of IFGGA2 and IRGM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoprecipitation of IFGGA2-GFP or IRGM-Myc was performed by GFP- or Myc-Trap beads (Chromotek) (Table S5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Investigating YAP-TEAD Interaction Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyse the effect of peptide 17 on the YAP‐TEAD interaction, NRK‐52E cells were transiently transfected with the vectors pRK5‐myc‐TEAD1 (Addgene #33109) or pEGFP‐C3‐YAP1 (Addgene #17843). Briefly, pelleted nuclei were isolated in 10 mM Tris pH 7.6, 10 mM KCl, 450 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol and 0.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and mixed with the cytosolic isolates prepared in 10 mM Tris pH 7.6, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.2% NP‐40. After incubation of the isolates comprising Myc‐TEAD with 200 μM of peptide 17 for half an hour on ice, the addition of the lysate containing GFP‐YAP was carried out, followed by an additional incubation of 30 min on ice. GFP‐Trap or Myc‐Trap beads (Chromotek) were then used for immunoprecipitation of GFP‐YAP or myc‐TEAD1, followed by washing and elution by boiling the immunoprecipitated proteins in sodium dodecyl sulfate buffer (SDS) (50 mM Tris pH 6.8, 20% glycerol, 2% SDS). Finally, the proteins were analysed using Western blot as indicated below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Affinity Purification of Tagged Yeast Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All yeast strains were grown to log phase (2–3 × 107 cells/ml). Afterwards, the cells were harvested and lysed in IP buffer (1 × PBS, 3 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0,5% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors from Roche). 35 µl of this lysate was loaded onto an SDS-gel (lysate lanes). The supernatant was incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with GFP-Selector beads (NanoTag) (Fig. 5A,B,D, Supplementary Fig. S5.1A, 5.2A, 5.3B) or with Myc-trap beads (Chromotek) (Fig. 5C, Supplementary Fig. S5.3A). The beads were washed five times with IP buffer, and finally resuspended in 35 µl SDS-sample buffer. The entire eluate sample was loaded onto the SDS-gels.
Subsequently, the proteins were detected by Western blot analyses with the indicated antibodies (GFP (Chromotek) 1:4,000; c-myc (9E10) (Santa Cruz) 1:1,000; Hem15 and Grx4 each 1:5,000 and Aco1 1:2,000 (U. Mühlenhoff); Nop1 (Santa Cruz) 1:4,000; Hdf1 (Yku70) (Santa Cruz) 1:4,000). Signals were detected with the Fusion SL system (PeqLab) and FusionFX7 Edge (Fusion FX Vilber). To be able to detect several proteins in one experiment, the western blots were cut horizontally according to the size of the desired proteins to be able to detect each stripe with individual antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in 50mM Tris pH8.0, 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton, 0.1% deoxycholic acid with protease inhibitors (Roche). The lysates were subject to anti-GFP immunoprecipitation using GFP-Trap beads or anti-Myc immunoprecipitation using Myc-Trap beads (ChromoTek), beads were washed with 50mM Tris pH8.0, 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton after 3–4 hours of incubation. Western Blot was visualized using the Licor-Odyssey system as described58 (link). The PGRN and sPLA2-IIA levels in the medium were analyzed following trichloroacetic acid precipitation as described58 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GRP94 and FKBP2 Interactome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
INS-1E cells were transfected at 60% confluence using Lipofectamine™ 3000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Denmark) with plasmids coding for GFP-tagged GRP94, PI, ER-localized GFP [23 (link),24 (link)] or myc-tagged FKBP2, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Proteins were immunoprecipitated (IP) using the magnetic GFP- or myc-trap beads (Chromotek, Germany). IP samples were reduced and alkylated, digested with trypsin/LysC and the resulting peptides were analyzed on a Bruker Impact II ESI-QTOF (Bruker Daltonics, USA) mass spectrometer (supplementary procedures).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoprecipitation of Par3-containing Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoprecipitation, cells transfected for 48 hr were lysed in the buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% TritonX-100, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF), containing cOmplete Mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). After centrifugation at 16,000 g, the supernatant was incubated with anti-FLAG agarose beads (Sigma) at 4°C for 2 hr or with anti-Myc antibodies (9E10) for 2 hr and Protein A Sepharose (GE Healthcare) at 4°C for 2 hr. Myc-trap beads (Chromotek) were used to pull-down Par3-containing protein complexes. The beads were washed three times in lysis buffer, and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using standard protocols (Gloy et al., 2002 (link)). Chemiluminescence was acquired by the ChemiDoc MP imager (BioRad) and band intensities were quantified by the accompanying software (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!