The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Model hem 907xl

Manufactured by Omron
Sourced in Japan

The Omron Model HEM-907XL is a blood pressure monitor designed for professional use in clinical settings. It features an automatic inflation and deflation system, and can display both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements, as well as pulse rate. The device is equipped with a large LCD display for easy readability.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using model hem 907xl

1

Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Dilation Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All studies were performed by a single registered diagnostic cardiac sonographer in participants who held vasoactive medications and were instructed not to smoke cigarettes or exercise prior to testing.1 (link),2 (link) After a 15-minute supine rest, left arm brachial blood pressure was measured by oscillometric sphygmomanometry (OMRON Model HEM-907XL; Omron Healthcare Inc., Kyoto, Japan). The right BA was imaged using a linear array vascular ultrasound transducer (ACUSON Sequoia Model C512, 8L5c transducer; Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA). Extra-vascular landmarks were labeled to ensure consistent imaging within and between studies over time. Overall gain, time-gain compensation settings, and contrast were the same across studies for each participant. After baseline B-mode and Doppler images were obtained, a blood pressure cuff was placed proximal to the visualized BA segment, was inflated for 4 minutes at 50 mmHg above systolic pressure, and adjusted upwards if necessary to ensure complete occlusion using a Hokanson E20 Rapid Cuff Inflation System (D.E. Hokanson Inc., Bellevue, WA, USA). After cuff release, longitudinal images of the BA and Doppler blood flow were obtained up to 90 seconds after cuff deflation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Age, sex, race, years of education, income, and smoking status (defined as never, current, and former) were self-reported and ascertained by standardized questionnaires. Physical activity was measured using total amount of exercise in exercise units, which was calculated using reports of the amount of time per week spent in 13 categories of physical activity over the past year. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). Diabetes was defined as fasting serum glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL or self-reported diabetes medication use in each exam year. Total cholesterol (mg/dl) was measured from fasting blood draws. BP was measured while seated using a standard automated BP measurement monitor (OMRON model HEM907XL; Omron). Additionally, participants reported their medication use, including use of diuretic medications. All the covariates were repeatedly ascertained from examinations from 1990 through 2015.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Resting Vitals and Metabolic Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP, DBP; mmHg) were measured using a blood pressure monitor (OMRON IntelliSense; Model HEM-907XL; OMRON Healthcare, IL, US). Participants were seated with their left arm resting on a table for 3 min prior to three blood pressure measurements taken 1 min apart. There was no significant difference between the three resting values so the mean of all measurements were used for data analysis.
After a 12 hr overnight fast, venous blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose, insulin, hs-CRP, fatty acids, and TGs (mmol/L). The bloods were analyzed at LifeLabs Medical Laboratory Services (Guelph, ON, CA)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measurement of Blood Pressure in SPRINT Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were seen in clinic for study visits at randomization, and at months 1, 2, 3 and every 3 months thereafter. Blood pressure at each study visit was measured using the average of three readings obtained with an automated oscillometric device (Model HEM-907XL; Omron Healthcare) at 1-minute intervals after the participant was seated for 5 minutes. While the SPRINT Manual of Procedures recommended that staff leave the participant for the 5-minute rest period, BP measurements were performed with the patient attended or unattended, depending on the site.15 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Longitudinal Gestational Blood Pressure Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following informed consent, gestational BP was assessed at enrollment (baseline, <20 weeks’ gestation) and at 2 follow-up visits 24 to 28 weeks of gestation (follow-up 1) and 32-36 weeks of gestation (follow-up 2). At each measurement period, resting (sitting) BP was measured in triplicate on the right arm, using an automatic digital BP monitor (OMRON, Model HEM-907XL); and the average of the three readings was used in the data analysis. SBP <70 mm Hg and DBP <35 mm Hg were excluded as implausible. There were no implausibly high values. At baseline, the maximum SBP and DBP were 156 and 95 mm Hg, respectively.
Trained field workers confirmed that the pregnant women participants had not smoked, consumed alcohol/caffeinated drinks, or cooked using biomass in the 30-minute period before BP measurement. If a participant was found to have a SBP ≥140 mm Hg and a DBP ≥90 mm Hg, or an SBP <80 mm Hg or a DBP <40 mm Hg, as an average of the three measurements taken at one time/visit, she was referred to the nearest health center. Women on BP medication during any time of the pregnancy were excluded (N=14, <0.3%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Resting Blood Pressure Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resting systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were measured using a validated automated BP monitor (Model HEM-907XL, OMRON Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) at baseline and all follow-up visits following five minutes of seated rest. At each timepoint, two measurements were taken with one minute in between measurements. If the two measurements differed by more than 20 mmHg (SBP) or 10 mmHg (DBP), a third measurement was obtained and the mean of the two closest measurements was used for analysis. In addition, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as MAP=DBP+13(SBPDBP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gestational Blood Pressure Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following informed consent, gestational BP was assessed at enrollment (baseline, <20 weeks’ gestation) and at two follow-up visits (24–28 weeks of gestation (follow-up 1) and 32–36 weeks of gestation (follow-up 2). At each measurement period, resting (sitting) BP was measured in triplicate on the right arm, using an automatic digital BP monitor (OMRON®, Model HEM-907XL); and the average of the three readings was used in the data analysis. SBP < 70 mmHg and/or DBP < 35 mmHg were excluded as implausible. There were no implausibly high values. At baseline, the maximum SBP and DBP were 156 and 95 mmHg, respectively.
Trained field workers confirmed that the pregnant women participants had not smoked, consumed alcohol/caffeinated drinks, or cooked using biomass in the 30-minute period prior to BP measurement. If a participant was found to have a SBP >= 140 mmHg and/or a DBP >= 90 mmHg, or an SBP < 80 mmHg or a DBP < 40 mmHg, as an average of the three measurements taken at one time/visit, she was referred to the nearest health center. Women on BP medication during any time of the pregnancy were excluded (N = 14, < 0.3%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!