The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using anti runx2 antibody

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Hypoxia-Induced Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were seeded into a 24-well plate and cultured under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 24 h. After 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Sigma-Aldrich) fixation for 30 min, cells were incubated with blocking buffer (Dako, Denmark) at 37°C for 1 h, followed by incubation with anti-HIF-1α antibody (1:300), anti-VEGF antibody (1:300), or anti-RUNX2 antibody (1:300) (all from Abcam) at 4°C overnight. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit or mouse IgG antibody conjugated with Alexa 488 or Alexa 588 (1:500) (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were then stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan). For tissue immunofluorescence, rat periodontal tissues of the right maxillary first molar were excised, frozen, sectioned, and antigen retrieved, which was followed by the steps listed above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Expression Analysis in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Beijing, China) was used to extract total protein from cells, and a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime) was used to measure the protein concentrations following the manufacturer’s protocols. The protein samples were separated and transferred using 12% SDS-PAGE and PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked in skimmed milk (5%) at room temperature for 2 h. After that, the membranes were cultured with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Primary antibodies includes anti-Smad3 antibody (1:1000, Abcam), anti-ALP antibody (1:1000, Abcam), anti-Osteopontin (OPN) antibody (1:1000, Abcam), anti-Runx-2 antibody (1:1000, Abcam), anti-Osterix antibody (1:1000, Abcam), and anti-GAPDH antibodies (1:2000, Abcam). In the next day, the membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugate secondary antibody (1:2000, Santa Cruz) for 1 h at room temperature. The enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used to measure the blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Osteogenic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After protein extraction, protein concentration was determined with a BCA assay (CWBIO, China). A 10% SDS-PAGE gel was loaded with 20 µg of total protein, and the separated proteins were transferred by electroblotting to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST (50mM tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6, 150mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) and incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C in 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST. Immunolabelling was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The antibodies used for Western blot were from the following sources: anti-Runx2 antibody (Abcam, UK; 1:1,000), anti-Osx antibody (Cell Signalling Technology, USA; 1:1,000), anti-ALP antibody (Cell Signalling Technology; 1:1,000), anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) antibody (Sigma-Aldrich; 1:10,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblotting Analysis of Collagen I, RUNX2, and GAPDH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed and extracted using lysis and extraction buffer (Pierce IP Lysis Buffer; cat. no. 87787; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols on day 7(24 (link)). Protein in the whole-cell lysates was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). A total of 10 µg/lane of protein samples were loaded on a 7.5% gel for collagen I and loaded on a 10% gel for RUNX2 and GAPDH experiments, respectively and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immun-Blot®; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) for immunoblotting. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4˚C: Anti-collagen I (1:500; cat. no. ab6308; Abcam), anti-RUNX2 antibody (1:200; cat. no. ab76956; Abcam) and anti-GAPDH antibody (1:2,000; cat. no. ab9485; Abcam). After washing with TBS-0.1% Tween-20, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; cat. no. ab205719; Abcam) and goat anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. ab205718; Abcam) at 1:10,000 dilution for 2 h at room temperature. The immunoblot signals were visualized using horseradish peroxidase substrate (cat. no. WBKLS0100; Merck KGaA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of the total protein from cells in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing the cocktail. Approximately 25 μg of protein was detached via a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel, and further transmitted to 0.45 µm PVDF membranes (Millipore, MA, USA) and blocked in TBST containing 5% fat-free milk for about 1 hour. Later, incubate the membranes with antibodies. Visualization of immunological assays was performed by using a chemiluminescent ECL reagent (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Primary antibodies were used as follows: anti-AGO2 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-IFIT2 antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, China), anti-RUNX2 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-ALP antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-OPN antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-GAPDH antibody (ZenBioscience, Chengdu, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Osteogenic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were washed by cold PBS 3 times; then, 150 μL RIPA lysate (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was added. The cells were lysed in ice water by ultrasound, and the protein content was determined by the Bradford method. An equal amount of proteins was taken from each group for 10% SDS-PAGE, and the proteins on the gel were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked at 4°C for 1 h and then incubated at 4°C overnight with the following primary antibodies: anti-RUNX2 antibody (1:500; Abcam, USA), anti-Osterix antibody (1:1000; Abcam, USA), anti-OCN antibody (1:500; Abcam, USA), anti-PI3K antibody (1:1000; Abcam, USA), anti-Akt antibody (1:300; Abcam, USA), anti-p-PI3K antibody (1:500; Abcam, USA), anti-p-Akt antibody (1:100; Abcam, USA), and anti-GAPDH antibody (1:1000; Abcam, USA). After being cleaned twice with TBST, the membranes were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with fluorescein-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (ab205718, 1:2000). The membrane was visualized with an ECL detection kit (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) using a chemiluminescence imaging system (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescent Characterization of hADSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular immunofluorescence was conducted as previously described55 (link). hADSCs were first fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) and then permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 (Invitrogen). The cells were incubated with an optimal concentration of rabbit anti-β-catenin antibody (1:500, Abcam), anti-Ostrix antibody (1:500, Abcam), anti-SATB2 antibody (1:500, Abcam) and anti-Runx2 antibody (1:500, Abcam) overnight at 4 °C followed by an incubation with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 546 secondary antibody (1:2000, Invitrogen), and the cells were subsequently rinsed five times with PBS. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (Invitrogen) prior to imaging on a Leica TCS SP8 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Images were constructed using Leica LAS AF software (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Osteogenic Protein Expression in MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect the osteogenic-related protein expression in the MSCs in each group, cells were incubated in an osteogenic induction medium for 1 week. Total protein was then extracted with cell lysis buffer and measured with a BCA kit (Thermo Scientific). Then, 40 μg total protein was separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes; after blocking with 5% non-fat dry milk, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti-Runx2 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, CA, USA), anti-Collagen I antibody (CST, Beverly, MA, USA), and anti-GAPDH antibody (CST, Beverly, MA, USA). All the antibodies were rabbit monoclonals and were diluted 1:1000 upon use. After rinsing with PBS, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit antibody (CST, Beverly, MA, USA) at 1:2000 dilution for 1 h at 37°C. After rinsing again, the membrane was scanned in an Odyssey Scanner (Li-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of RUNX2 in Osteoblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from lysates of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in osteoblast differentiation medium for 12 days via the same method described above using M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Single-Use Cocktail (100×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The protein solution was centrifuged, and the supernatant was mixed with 4× Bolt LDS Sample Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) on a Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride Membrane Filter Paper Sandwich (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The membranes were probed using an anti-RUNX2 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) or an anti-β-actin HRP-conjugated antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), followed by incubation with StartingBlock (TBS) Blocking Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with ECL Select reagent (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) and analyzed using an Image Quant LAS 4000 system (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Runx2 Expression Quantification in Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 7 days of culture, cells were lysed, and the resulting protein-containing supernatants were transferred to PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membranes. After blocking, the membranes were incubated with anti-Runx2 antibody (1: 1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight, followed by incubation with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1: 3000, Abcam) for 2 hours the next day. Targeted protein bands were visualized using an ECL kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China). The intensity of the protein bands was quantified by Adobe Photoshop software.
The general steps for immunofluorescence were described earlier. The primary antibody was an anti-Runx2 antibody (1: 200). The secondary antibody was a rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1: 200, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The images were analyzed by Image-Pro Plus software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!