The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fraction recovery system

Manufactured by Beckman Coulter
Sourced in United States

The Fraction Recovery System is a lab equipment designed to collect and store fractions from liquid chromatography or other separation techniques. It allows for the automated and precise collection of specific sample components as they elute from a separation column or other device. The system provides controlled collection of fractions to enable further analysis or purification of the separated components.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using fraction recovery system

1

Purification of HSV-1 and PRV Virions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Virions of HSV-1 (strain KOS) and PRV (strain Becker) were isolated from the medium of infected Vero cells (CCL-81™ from ATCC®) as described previously.16 (link) Vero cells (1.5 × 108) were infected overnight (18 h at 37°C) with HSV-1 or PRV at a multiplicity-of-infection (MOI) of 5 plaque forming units (PFU) per cell. Infected cells were scraped into the cell medium and 5M NaCl was added to a final concentration of 0.5 M NaCl. Cells were pelleted and the media was transferred to SW28 rotor tubes and virions were pelleted out of the medium by centrifugation at 20K rpm for 35 minutes. The resulting pellet was resuspended in TNE buffer (10mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, pH 7.5) + protease inhibitors and the sample was layered on top of a 20–50% sucrose (in TNE) gradient (SW41 rotor at 24000 rpm for 1hr). The gradient was fractionated using a Beckman Fraction Recovery system and the virion fractions were pooled, resuspended in TNE buffer and the virions were pelleted (SW41 rotor at 24000 rpm for 1hr). The virions were resuspended in TNE buffer for cryo-EM studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validating HT-SIP Pipeline with Fractionation and PEG Precipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the automated steps of our HT-SIP pipeline, we compared fractionation and PEG precipitations using both manual and automated methods. Automated fractionation was performed as described above, and manual fractionation was conducted with a Beckman Coulter fraction recovery system as previously described [17 (link)]. Samples were fractionated into approximately 22 fractions, although the number of fractions recovered by manual SIP typically varies despite identical run conditions.
To compare automated versus manual PEG precipitations, 4 μg soil DNA (extracted from a sample collected at the Hopland Research and Extension Center in Hopland, CA 38° 59′ 35″ N, 123° 4′ 3″ W) was added per density gradient. Automated precipitations were performed as described above. For manual precipitations, PEG precipitations were conducted in microcentrifuge tubes as previously described [50 (link)] using published centrifuge speeds and times, which we note are faster than those used for our HT-SIP plate-based method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification of HSV-1 and PRV Virions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Virions of HSV-1 (strain KOS) and PRV (strain Becker) were isolated from the medium of infected Vero cells (CCL-81™ from ATCC®) as described previously.16 (link) Vero cells (1.5 × 108) were infected overnight (18 h at 37°C) with HSV-1 or PRV at a multiplicity-of-infection (MOI) of 5 plaque forming units (PFU) per cell. Infected cells were scraped into the cell medium and 5M NaCl was added to a final concentration of 0.5 M NaCl. Cells were pelleted and the media was transferred to SW28 rotor tubes and virions were pelleted out of the medium by centrifugation at 20K rpm for 35 minutes. The resulting pellet was resuspended in TNE buffer (10mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, pH 7.5) + protease inhibitors and the sample was layered on top of a 20–50% sucrose (in TNE) gradient (SW41 rotor at 24000 rpm for 1hr). The gradient was fractionated using a Beckman Fraction Recovery system and the virion fractions were pooled, resuspended in TNE buffer and the virions were pelleted (SW41 rotor at 24000 rpm for 1hr). The virions were resuspended in TNE buffer for cryo-EM studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Subcellular Fractionation of HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OTX2-HeLa cells (2 × 107) were scrapped from the culture plates and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, 10010023) to separate the nucleus from cytoplasmic fraction using NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific, 78833). Cytoplasmic fractions were then centrifuged at 500rcf for 10 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant (S1). Next, the S1 fractions were centrifuged at 2000 rcf for 20 min at 4 °C. The resultant S2 samples were carefully loaded on top of sucrose solution forming the gradients (5–45%), which were generated by Linear Gradient Makers (C.B.S. Scientific, GM-20) according to manufacturer’s instructions, prior to ultracentrifugation at 257,000rcf for 18 h at 4 °C. After ultracentrifugation, each fraction was collected in an equal volume using the Fraction Recovery System (Beckman Coulter, 270-331580) from bottom to top.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Density Gradient Centrifugation for qSIP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples were prepared for density gradient centrifugation according to previously defined protocol for qSIP [23 ]. In brief, density gradient centrifugations were carried out in a TLN-100 Optima MAX-TL ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) near-vertical rotor at 18 °C for 72 h at 165,000 × g. In all, 50 µl of DNA spanning from 0.5 to 1.5 µg [24 ] was added to a solution of cesium chloride (CsCl) and gradient buffer (0.1 M Tris, 0.1 M KCl and 1 mM EDTA) in order to achieve a starting density of 1.70 g mL-1 in a 3.3-mL polyallomer OptiSeal tubes (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). After ultracentrifugation, the density gradients were fractionated into 15 equal fractions of 200 µl from the bottom of polyallomer OptiSeal tubes by using a syringe pump and fraction recovery system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The density of these fractions was measured with an AR200 digital refractometer (Reichert Analytical Instruments, Depew, NY, USA). DNA was precipitated from the fractions using two volumes of polyethylene glycol with 2 µl (10 mg mL-1) glycogen and precipitated overnight at room temperature. DNA was pelleted by centrifugation (13,000 × g; 40 min), washed with 70% ethanol, and resuspended with 30 µl molecular-grade (DEPC-treated) water. DNA was quantified fluorometrically using a Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Viral Particle Separation by Sucrose Gradient

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method of separation of viral particles was modified from the original protocol described (107 (link)). Sucrose gradients were prepared fresh before each fractionation with 15% (w/v) and 30 (w/v)% sucrose in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4)-10 mM NaCl-1.5 mM MgCl2. The Gradient Master gradient maker (Biocomp) was used for continuous 15–30 % gradient preparation. Gradients were prepared in Beckman Ultra-Clear Centrifuge Tubes (14 × 89 mm, Beckman Coulter). Following preparation, 1 mL of radiolabeled lysate was loaded on top of the continuous sucrose gradient and was sedimented via centrifugation for 3h at 27500 rpm at 15°C using a Beckman SW41 rotor in Beckman ultracentrifuge at slow acceleration and deceleration with no brake. After centrifugation, each tube was placed into the Fraction Recovery System (Beckman Coulter) and the bottom of the tube was punctured, 500µL fractions were collected from the bottom of the tube into 1.5mL Eppendorf tubes by gravity flow. Radioactivity in each fraction was calculated by taking 20µL of each fraction and diluting in 4mL of CytoScint Liquid Scintillation Cocktail (MP Biomedicals) with the following measurement in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman LS-3801).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Glycerol Gradient Fractionation of Cellular Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 84-31 and 84-31 mNIPP1 cells were grown on 100 mm plates, then lysed with 0.5 mL of whole cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation for 30 min at 10,000× g and loaded on top of 10% to 30% glycerol gradient. The glycerol gradient buffer contained 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 150 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA. The gradients were spun in a Sorvall XL-90 Ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) with a SW41 Ti rotor at 38,000 rpm for 18 h. Twenty fractions were collected through a needle inserted to the bottom of the tube using fraction recovery system (Beckman Coulter). Proteins were precipitated with 70% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting as indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Soil Metagenome Extraction and Density Gradient Centrifugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was conducted on two soil samples from each treatment that were incubated for 3, 6, and 9 days, using a Powersoil DNA extraction kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc. Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA content was quantified with an ND-2,000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Thereafter, about 10,000-ng DNA was added to Quick-Seal polyallomer tubes (13 × 51 mm, 5.1 mL, Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA, USA) and spun in Tris-EDTA (TE, pH 8.0)/CsCl solution. Prior to sealing the tubes with one cordless quick-seal tube topper (Beckman Coulter), the average buoyant density (BD) of all prepared gradients was confirmed with a digital refractometer (model AR200, Leica Microsystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA), and adjusted by adding small volumes of CsCl solution or Tris-EDTA buffer. The tubes were transferred to an ultracentrifuge (Optima L-100XP, Beckman Coulter). Centrifugation was performed at 45,000 g (20°C) for 48 h. Subsequently, the centrifuge tubes were placed onto a fraction recovery system (Beckman Coulter) and fractions (150 μL for each) were collected. The BD of each fraction was then measured, and CsCl was removed by introducing concentrated ethanol [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gradient Fractionation of DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted genomic DNA from the second SIP microcosm (+13CO2) of experiment 3 and separated 13C-labeled DNA from unlabeled community (12C-DNA) using the gradient fractionation method (32 (link), 33 (link)). Briefly, 3 μg of genomic DNA was mixed with gradient buffer (GB; 0.1 M tris, 0.1 M KCl, and 1 mM EDTA) to a final volume of 1 ml. The GB/DNA mixture was then combined with the CsCl solution (1.870 g ml−1) to a final volume of 6.00 ml and then loaded in a polyallomer bell-top Quick-Seal centrifuge tube (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA). Centrifuge tubes were sealed, put into the Vti-65 rotor, and then spun at 50,800 rpm and 20°C for 60 hours with vacuum in a Himac CP 80β ultracentrifuge (Hitachi Koko Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A fraction recovery system (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA) in connection with a syringe pump (model R-100E, Razel, Georgia, VT) was used to retrieve DNA gradients. The buoyant density of gradient fractions was determined using a refractometer (AR200, Reichert, Depew, NY, USA). DNA from gradient fractions was precipitated with isopropanol at 25°C for 2 hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Separation of Isotopically Labeled DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
12C- and 13C-labeled DNA were separated on a CsCl gradient. The CsCl solution was prepared in 0.1 M Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer, resulting in a buoyant density of about 1.7742 g/mL as measured by an AR200 digital refractometer (Reichert Technologies, NY), and was distributed into 4.7-mL OptiSeal polypropylene ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman Coulter, CA). All the genomic DNA (gDNA) from the gas-phase incubations and 1 μg of the gDNA of the liquid-phase incubations of the air enrichment were added to the CsCl gradients. The buoyant densities of the gradients were then adjusted to be between 1.7231 and 1.7340 g/mL by the addition of more of the CsCl solution or TE buffer. The gradients were centrifuged at 86,700 × g at 28°C for at least 48 h in an Optima Max TL ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, CA). After centrifugation, the samples were fractionated with a fraction recovery system (Beckman Coulter, CA), with the aid of a syringe pump, and 24 fractions of 200 μL were collected. The DNA was precipitated using a glycogen-assisted ethanol precipitation. After precipitation, DNA was resuspended in 20 μL of nuclease-free water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!