The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using kromasil 100 5 c18 column

1

HPLC Analysis of TDL Batches

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven different batches of TDL (S1S11) were analyzed by HPLC using a DIONEX U3000 HPLC system. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: solution A: acetonitrile; solution B: water; mobile phase: A 50% from 0 to 25 min, A 65% from 25 to 35 min, A 70% from 35 to 40 min, and finally A 70% from 40 to 55 min. The wavelength was 216 nm, the sample volume was 10 μL, the column temperature was 25°C, and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. Separation was performed using a Kromasil 100-5 C18 column from AKZO NOBEL (particle size: 5 μm, length×diameter: 250 × 4.6 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metronidazole Stress Study and Photolytic Degradant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the stress study of metronidazole in aqueous solutions and the vaginal lotion, as well as in further verification testing of its major photolytic degradant, the LC system (Shimadzu, Darul Khusus, Malaysia) consisted of a binary pump (LC-2030C plus), an autosampler (LC-2030C plus), a photo diode array (PDA) detector (LC-2030C plus) and a LC-2030C plus column oven. Data acquisition, analysis and reporting were performed using Shimadzu LC-Solution software. The starting chromatographic conditions chosen were based on available compendial monographs of metronidazole7 –11 . The Kromasil 100-5 C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm) (AkzoNobel, Bohus, Sweden) was maintained at 30 °C. Mobile phase A (0.05 mol/L KH2PO4 in water) and mobile phase B (methanol) were pumped at a total flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The gradient program (time (min), % B) was set as: (0, 20), (12, 20), (30, 40), (40, 40), (45, 70), (50, 70), (51, 20), (60, 20). Sample solutions were 0.2 mg/mL of metronidazole in methanol–water (20:80, v/v) and the system suitability solution contained 1 μg/mL of metronidazole RS, 2-methyl-5-nitroimidazole RS and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-5-methyl -l,2,4-oxadiazole-3-carboxamide RS, respectively. The injection volume was 10 μL and detection wavelengths were set at 315 nm and 230 nm simultaneously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of SM Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The levels of the five active components of SM were determined by an Agilent 1200 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (DAD detector, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA)8 (link) with a Kromasil 100-5C18 column (250 mm ×4.6 mm, 5 μm; AkzoNobel, Bohus, Sweden) and a detection wavelength of 288 nm at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 at 40°C. The mobile phase is a gradient elution of methanol (solvent A) and 0.05% phosphoric acid (solvent B). The gradient ratio of the mobile phase is as follows: 0–4 minutes, 35% A, 65% B; 4–16 minutes, 40% A, 60% B; 16–23 minutes, 45% A, 55% B; 23–40 minutes, 50% A, 50% B. The recovery rate of the five components is 98.6%–103.0%, and the within-day and between-day relative standard deviations are 0.17%–1.86%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-UV Quantification of Phthalides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quantification of five phthalides of VOC in formulation samples was determined by a validated reversed-phase HPLC-UV method (Shimdzu, Japan). The HPLC system consisted of a LC-20AT pump, an SPD-M20A PAD-visible detector, a SIL-20A injector with a 20 μL loop and an LC solution workstation. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of ultrapure water (A) and acetonitrile (B) (0~10 min, 38~42% B; 10~36 min, 42~45% B; 36~55 min, 45~48% B; 55~60 min, 48~38% B) was delivered with a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and separation was performed using an Akzo Nobel Kromasil 100-5-C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm) with a sample injection volume of 20 µL. The analysis was performed at 30 °C with UV detection at 280 nm for senkyunolide A(SA) and Z-ligustilide (ZL), and 230 nm for neocnnolide (NOL), n-butylphthalide (NBP) and butenylphthalide (BP) [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of WB Water Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5-n-Nonadecylresorcinol, 5-n-heneicosylresorcinol, pinellic acid and tachioside from the water extract of WB were isolated and identified as described previously [21 (link)]. Conditions for High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were described as follows: Waters Alliance e2695 separating module (Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA) using photodiode array detector (Waters 2998) with autosampler and column oven was used for the analysis. Separation was achieved using a Kromasil 100-5-C18 column (5 µm, 250 × 4.6 mm i.d., AkzoNobel, Bohus, Sweden). The mobile phase consisted of water-trifluoroacetic acid (99.95:0.05; v/v) (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The elution was performed using the following gradient: initial 95:5 (A:B v/v); 10 min 95:5 (A:B v/v); 30 min 50:50 (A:B v/v); 45 min 0:100 (A:B v/v); and 70 min 0:100 (A:B v/v). The mobile phase flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 10 μL, and the column temperature was set at 30 °C. All operations, including data acquisition and analysis, were controlled by Empower™ 3 chromatography data software (Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA). The HPLC chromatogram of the water extract of WB was presented in Figure 4a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Atorvastatin Concentration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentration of ATV was determined using HPLC. The HPLC system included a pump (W2690/5; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), ultraviolet detector (W2489; Waters Corporation), data station (Empower 3; Waters Corporation), and chromatographic Kromasil 100-5C18 column (150×4.6 mm, 5 μm; Akzo Nobel, Sickla Industriväg, Sweden) that was maintained at a flow rate of 1.0 mL per minute at 25°C. Isocratic mobile phase included acetonitrile and 0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 4.0; 50:50 [v/v]). The pH was adjusted using glacial acetic acid. Finally, 10 μL of each sample was injected into the column, and ATV concentration was measured under ultraviolet detection at 270 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Waters Alliance e2695 separating module (Waters, MA, USA) using photodiode array detector (Waters 2998) with autosampler and column oven was used for the analysis. Separation was achieved using a Kromasil 100-5-C18 column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm i.d., AkzoNobel, Bohus, Sweden). The mobile phase consisted of water–trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, 99.95:0.05; v/v) (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The elution was performed using the following gradient: initial 90:10 (A:B v/v); 40 min 50:50 (A:B v/v); and 60 min 0:100 (A:B v/v). The mobile phase flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 10 μL, and the column temperature was set at 30 °C. All operations, including data acquisition and analysis, were controlled by Empower™ 3 chromatography data software (Waters Co., MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC-Based Screening of Antioxidant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Major antioxidant compounds in PLPF-W and PLPF-E were screened using online HPLC-DPPH and HPLC-ABTS post-column derivatization as previously described [29 ,30 (link)], with slight modifications. The phytochemicals were monitored in line A, with a second pump delivering ethanol or PBS to the PDA detector operating at 280 nm (Fig. 2A line 1). The antioxidant components were monitored in line B, with the second pump delivering DPPH radical or ABTS working solution to the detector, where decolorization of the mixture was detected photometrically as a negative peak at 517 nm (DPPH) or 729 nm (ABTS) (Fig. 2A line2). Separation of compounds (sample injection volume 2 μL) was achieved at 30 °C on a Kromasil 100-5-C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm; AkzoNobel, Sweden). Mobile phases A (0.2% acetic acid) and B (100% acetonitrile) at 0.7 mL/min were used for elution as follows: 0–5 min, 5–10% B; 5–8 min, 10–15% B; 8–40 min, 15–20% B; 40–55 min, 20% B; 55–60 min, 20–50% B; 60–65 min, 50–80% B; 65–70 min, 80% B; and 70–75 min, 80-5% B. DPPH and ABTS reagents were pumped into a 10 m reaction coil (0.25 mm ID) at 0.2 mL/min and 37 °C.

Instrument setup for online screening of (A) DPPH and ABTS antioxidants by UPLC, and (B) Antityrosinase inhibitors by HPLC.

Fig. 2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Polysaccharide Monosaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polysaccharide sample DOPs were dissolved with distilled water to the concentration of 1 mg/mL. And the pH of the samples was adjusted to 7.0 using NaOH solution after the 3 M HCl was added to the sample solution, while the concentration of mixed monosaccharide standards, galactose (Gal), mannose (Man), glucose (Glu), and rhamnose monohydrate (Rha), was adjusted to 0.45 mg/mL. The solutions of samples and mixed monosaccharide standards were converted to their derivatives with 0.5 M PMP. All the solutions were allowed to react at 70°C in an oven for 100 min and then cooled to ambient temperature (25°C) and added with 0.3 M HCl. Last, chloroform was added and mixed via vortexing, followed by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min to discard chloroform. This procedure was repeated 3 times until no colour was evident in the chloroform layer. The lower water-phase layers were the sample solution and mixed monosaccharide standard solution.
The monosaccharide compositions of DOPs were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Kromasil 100-5-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) (Akzo Nobel, Sweden). The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile (solvent A) and 0.1 M phosphate buffer (solvent B) at a ratio of 15.5 : 84.5 under isocratic elution, and the flow rate was 0.8 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC Analysis of LXP Concentrations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of LXP were determined by HPLC. The HPLC systems consisted of a pump (W2690/5; Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA), ultraviolet detector (W2489, Waters Corp.), and a data station (Empower 3; Waters Corp.). Chromatographic separation was performed using a Kromasil 100-5-C18 column (150×4.6 mm, 5 µm; AkzoNobel, Bohus, Sweden) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of methanol, water, acetic anhydride, and trimethylamine (600:400:1:1 in volume ratio). Of each sample, 10 µL was injected into the column, and ultraviolet detection was performed at 222 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!