The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using anti sox1

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 4% PFA in 1X PBS for 10 min, rinsed 3×5 min in PBS and permeabilized with Triton-X100 0.1% for 15 min, blocked for 2 hr in Blocking Solution (2% Fetal calf serum, 2% BSA, 0.2% Fish skin gelatin and 1X PBS), and incubated for one hour at room temperature, with the following antibodies: Anti-OCT4 (Abcam, #ab19857); Anti-TRA-1–60 (Abcam, #ab16288); anti-SOX1 (R&D Systems, #AF3369), anti-Nestin (Millipore, #MAB5326), anti-VGLUT1 (Synaptic Systems, #135303), anti-TuJ1 (Millipore, #MAB1637). Cells were then washed 3×5 min in PBS-T (1X PBS with 0.1% Tween-20) and incubated for 1 hr with Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG or Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Invitrogen). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Slides were rinsed 3×5 min in PBS-T and mounted with Mowiol (DABCO). Images were acquired on an Axioscop 40FL Microscope (ZEISS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibody Characterization and Stem Cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-NANOG (PE conjugate), anti-OCT4 (Alexa Fluor 647 and PerCp-Cy5.5 conjugate), anti-SSEA-3 (Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate), anti-SOX2 (PerCp-Cy5.5 conjugate), anti-CD184 (PE conjugate), anti-nestin (Alexa Fluor 647 conjugate), and anti-FoxA2 (PE conjugate) antibodies and their isotype control antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences. Anti-GATA4, anti-OTX2, anti-SOX17, anti-SOX1, anti-HAND1, and anti-brachyury antibodies were purchased from R&D Systems (Abingdon, Oxon, UK). Anti-CD133 (PE conjugate) and anti-PE conjugated magnetic beads were purchased from Miltenyi Biotec GmbH (Bergish Gladbach, Germany). Sodium butyrate, lovastatin, and reagents for differentiation CHIR99021, SB431542, and LDN193189 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA). Lovastatin was activated into active lactone form according to the protocol [20 (link)]. The control solution was prepared using the same protocol, but without adding any lovastatin. Only activated lovastatin (5 mM solution in MQ water) was used in the experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Neural Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemistry staining was done as described previously (Wang et al., 2011 (link); Hahn et al., 2013 (link)). Each antibody staining was
performed on multiple brain sections and the experiment was repeated one or more
times. Primary antibodies are as follows: anti-DLX2 (Kuwajima et al., 2006 (link)), anti-SATB2 (abcam, ab51502,
1:200 dilution), anti-SOX2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-17320, 1:200 dilution),
anti-SOX1 (R&D Systems, AF3369, 1:100 dilution), anti-SOX5 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, sc-20091, 1:200 dilution), anti-CNTN2/TAG-1 (Developmental
Studies Hybridoma Bank, 4D7/TAG1, 1:10 dilution), anti-WNT-7b (Novus,
NBP1-59564, 1:200 dilution). Secondary antibodies with minimal cross reactivity
to other species were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch. Images were taken
using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM510 META NLO Axiovert 200M Inverted) or a
fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX81 Automated Inverted). LSM Image Browser and
Image-Pro Premier were used for image process and quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of SOX1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assays for immunofluorescence staining were performed as described previously [35 (link),48 (link)]. The following antibody was used in the immunofluorescence assay: anti-SOX1 (R&D Systems). Finally, DAPI was used for nuclei staining, and images were visualized using a fluorescence microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Immunolabeling of Neural Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemical analysis, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 120mM phosphate buffer (PBS), pH 7.4, permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS, blocked with 10% goat serum in PBS and subjected to immunohistochemistry staining with primary and secondary antibodies diluted in the blocking solution.
For immunolabelling the following antibodies at indicated dilutions were used: anti-Nestin (1:400; BD Bioscience), anti-Sox1 (1:100; R&D Systems), anti-Sox2 (1:200; Abcam), anti-Pax6 (1:200; DSHB), anti-Ki67 (1:200; Vector Labs), anti-TuJ1 (1:400; Covance), anti-Map2 (1:200; Millipore), anti-DCX (1:200; Millipore), anti-GFAP (1:200; Millipore), anti-O4 (1:50, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-GABA (1:200, Abcam), anti-vGlut1 (1:200; Millipore), anti-TH (1:100, Millipore), anti-Synaptophysin (1:100; Millipore), anti-PSD95 (1:200; Invitrogen), anti-vimentin (1:5000; Abcam), anti-S100β (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), secondary Alexafluorophore-conjugated antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen). DNA was stained using Hoechst 33258 (1:10000, Invitrogen). All cells expressing a particular marker were counted manually and normalized to the total number of cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neural Differentiation of Human iPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human iPSCs were differentiated into haematopoietic cells as described previously17 (link). Neural cell differentiation was performed in accordance with previous protocols60 (link) with slight modifications. iPSC colonies were mechanically dissociated into small aggregate suspensions and then plated onto Costar six-well ultra-low-attachment plates (Corning, NY, USA) in DFK medium (hES medium with 10 μM SB431542, 2 μM Compound C and 1% penicillin/streptomycin) with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor (Y27632; Reagents Direct). Medium without ROCK inhibitor was changed on day 2, day 4, and day 6. On day 8, EBs were collected and plated on Matrigel-coated 12-well plates in DFN2D medium containing DMEM/F12, 50% Neurobasal medium, 0.5% N2 supplement, 0.5% B27 supplement, 1% L-alanyl-L-glutamine, 1% MEM nonessential amino acid solution, 1% glutamax-1,2-mercaptethanol, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 20 ng/µl basic fibroblast growth factor. Medium was changed every 2 days for 6 days. On day 18, cells were dissociated using TryPLE Express (Life Technologies) and plated on 24-well plates. Passage was performed every 2 days. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the following primary antibodies: anti-Sox1 (R&D Systems) and anti-Nestin (eBiosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Detailed Cellular Assays for Cancer Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assays for Western blot, cell viability by MTS(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, Inner Salt), anchorage-independent growth, and invasion were performed as described previously [47 (link),48 (link)]. Detailed descriptions are accessible in the Supplementary Materials and Methods. The following antibodies were used in Western blot: anti-SOX1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-HES1 (Cell Signal, Danvers, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunocytochemistry for Stem Cell Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunocytochemistry was performed as described previously with some modifications18 (link). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100/PBS for 15 min. Then, cells were blocked with 5% foetal bovine serum/PBS for 30 min. For primary antibodies, cells were incubated at 4 °C for 16 h with the respective antibodies, such as anti-SOX1 (1:100, R&D Systems), anti-SOX2 (1:100, R&D Systems), anti-PAX6 (1:100, Stemgent, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-Nestin (1:200, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-TUJ1 (1:1,500, Covance, Berkeley, CA, USA), anti-MAP2 (1:1,500, Millipore), anti-TBR1 (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-GFAP (1:1,500, DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA), anti-p62 (1:100, Abcam), anti-NeuN (1:100, Millipore), anti-cleaved caspase 3 (1:800, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), anti-GRP78/BIP (Abcam), or anti-GADD153/CHOP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Cells were washed with PBS and then incubated for 60 min with secondary antibodies such as Alexa Fluor 488, 555, 594, or 647 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). The cytoplasm was stained with HCS CellMask Deep Red Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!