The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

249 protocols using prism 7.0a

1

Evaluation of Biomarker Sensitivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using Graphpad Prism 7.0a. Patient samples were compared to controls using student t-test at the level of significance of 0.05 performed using Graphpad Prism 7.0a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Blinded Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In all cases, investigators were blinded for the genotype or treatment group of the respective animals or samples. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Normal distribution was tested for by either Kolmogorov-Smirnov- or Shapiro-Wilk-Test. For parametric data, comparative analysis was performed using Unpaired Student’s t-test or Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. For nonparametric data, either Mann-Whitney- or Kruskal-Wallis-test followed by Dunn’s post-hoc test was performed. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Graphs were created with GraphPad Prism 7.0a. All statistical calculations were carried out using GraphPad Prism 7.0a (GraphPad). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical tests used for each experiment and the number of biological samples (n) are stated in the figure legends. Statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0a. A minimum of two independent experiments were performed and a minimum total of 5 biological samples were observed, analysed or quantified except for Fig. 2b at ALH0; 3k; 5c; 6 (3 times, see main text); Supplementary Figs. 2b, d and  5a, b at ALH24. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. No data were excluded, except rare outliers detected through the ROUT method (Q = 0.1%, GraphPad Prism 7.0a). The experiments were not randomised. The Investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
For all box and whisker plots, whiskers mark the minimum and maximum, the box includes the 25th–75th percentile, and the line in the box is the median. Individual values are superimposed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data are presented as the median and interquartile range or mean ± SD depending on the data. The data were analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Dunn`s test of multiple comparisons or an ANOVA test and Tukey’s multiple mean comparisons test according to the normality of the data. All the data were analyzed using R 3.3.0 statistical software, and the graphics were made using Prism7.0a. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis for Biological Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data have been presented as mean ± SEM. Continuous data with two treatment groups were analyzed with a Student’s t-test. Categorical data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. Experiments with continuous data and only two treatments were compared using Student’s t-test. Experiments comparing two treatments over time were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test comparing treatments (e.g., cell lines) within the same time point. All analyses were performed in Prism 7.0a. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Urinary Uric Acid Excretion and Prostaglandins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables are reported in percentages. The normality of data was test by Shapiro Wilk (S-W test). The independent-samples t test and the Mann–Whitney U test were applied for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. Correlations were detected by Pearson’s or Spearman’s depending on the distribution of the data. If Pearson’s correlation analysis was statistically significant, multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association of urinary uric acid excretion with prostaglandins. Statistical significance for all analysis was set at P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with software SPSS 22.0 and Prism 7.0a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with Prism 7.0a. Two-tailed t-tests were used for data with an assumed Gaussian distribution whereas Mann-Whitney tests were used as non-parametric tests. Kaplan Meier survival curves were analyzed with a log rank test. Statistical significance was defined as a p<0.05. IC50 values and curves were generated using non-linear regression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analyzing Gut Microbiome Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Figures and statistics were performed using the Prism 7.0a software. All the data shown represent the mean ± SEM. Chi-Square test was performed to compare the relative abundance of the bacterial phylum/genus of the intestinal microbiota. Data that were not normally distributed according to the D’Agostino & Pearson normality test were log transformed and distribution was re-assessed. Student’s t test or ANOVA with the Newman-Keuls test were used to determine significant differences between two groups or to analyze significant differences among multiple test groups, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Urinary Uric Acid and Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The continuous variables are reported in mean ± SD and categorical variables are presented in percentages. Medians with inter quartile range (IQR) are presented in case of nonparametric data. Comparisons between groups were made by Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA. Least significance difference (LSD) test was used when the variance was homogeneous, or Tamhane’s T2 test was used. Non-normally distributed data was compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data was compared using the Chi-square test. Correlations were detected by Pearson’s or Spearman’s depending on the distribution of the data. If Pearson’s correlation analysis was statistically significant, multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association of urinary uric acid excretion with 24 h ambulatory blood pressure values. Statistical significance for all analyses was set at P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with software SPSS 22.0, Stata 14.0, and Prism 7.0a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ANOVA assessed differences between means of values; a Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was used in case of multiple comparisons. These statistical analyses, along with linear regression analysis, were performed using Prism GraphPad 7.0a for Macintosh. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!