The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using teicoplanin

1

Enterococcus Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The present study was conducted at Vinayaka Mission's Medical College and Hospitals, Salem Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) Clearance (MICROBIOLOGY/Ph.D/01/2015) was obtained prior to this study A total of 1200 clinical samples received at the Department of Microbiology for routine culture and sensitivity were included. A total of 774 isolates of Enterococci obtained from 1200 clinical samples were processed for species identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Identification of isolates to the species level was performed by the sugar utilization test using brain heart infusion broth incorporated with 1% sugar and bromothymol blue indicator.[9 (link)] Isolates of Enterococci were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines[10 ] using the following drugs: penicillin (10 U), erythromycin (15 μg), high-level gentamicin (120 μg), linezolid (30 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and nitrofurantoin (300 μg).(Himedia Laboratories Ltd.) The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for these antibiotics were also determined bythe Vitek automated system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of A. hydrophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility profile for A. hydrophila Ah17 was determined by the Kirby‐Bauer disk diffusion method (Bauer, Kirby, Sherris, & Turck, 1966). The following antibiotics were tested: Amikacin (AK: 30 μg), Amoxicillin (AMC: 30 μg), Ampicillin (AMP: 10 μg), Azithromycin (AZM: 15 μg), Cefixime (CFM: 5 μg), Cefoperazone (CPZ: 75 μg), Cefpodoxime (CPD: 10 μg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5 μg), Chlorompenicol (C: 30 μg), Clarithromycin (CLR: 15 μg), Co‐Trimoxazole (COT: 25 μg), Doxycycline hydrochloride (DO: 30 μg), Fosfomycin (FO: 200 μg), Fusidic acid (FC: 10 μg), Gentamicin (GEN: 10 μg), Imipenem (IPM: 10 μg), Kanamycin (K: 30 μg), Linezolid (LZ: 30 μg), Methicillin (MET: 5 μg), Minocycline (MI: 30 μg), Nalidixic acid (NA: 30 μg), Nitrofurantoin (NIT: 300 μg), Norfloxacin (NX: 10 μg), Penicillin G (P: 10 μg), Pristinomycin (RP: 15 μg), Rifampicin (RIF: 5 μg), Streptomycin (S: 10 μg), Teicoplanin (TEI: 30 μg), Tetracycline (TE: 30 μg), Trimethoprim (TR: 5 μg), Tobramycin (TOB: 10 μg), and Vancomycin (VA: 30 μg) (HiMedia). 200 μl of A. hydrophila Ah17 suspension was swabbed on Mueller‐Hinton agar (MHA) medium (HiMedia) and kept for drying. Antibiotic discs were placed on the MHA medium and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hr. The diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured, and susceptibility was categorized according to the manufacturer's protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of MRSA Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test for all the MRSA isolates were performed using ampicillin (A), ampicillin/sulfbactam (A/S), chloramphenicol (CL), ciprofloxacin (CP), clindamycin (CD), co-trimoxazole (COT), levofloxacin (LE), linezolid (LZ), fusidic acid (FC), minocycline (MIN), mupirocin (MU), ofloxacin (OF), oxacillin (OX), gentamicin (G), tetracycline (TET), rifampicin (RIF), teicoplanin (TEI), and vancomycin (V) (HiMedia Laboratories, India). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of daptomycin and vancomycin were determined by E-test method (Biomerieux, New Delhi; Ezy MIC strips, HiMedia Laboratories, India). The MRSA isolate that exhibited a vancomycin MIC of 4-8 mg/L was considered a VISA isolate. All assays were performed in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.[18 ]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Isolated Organisms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility tests of the isolated organisms were done using Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) by the standard disk diffusion technique of the Kirby-Bauer method as recommended by CLSI [21 ]. The following antibiotics with specified concentrations were used: ampicillin (10 μg), ampicillin-sulbactam (10/10 μg), amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), cefixime (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), cotrimoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), colistin sulfate (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), doxycycline (30 μg), and chloramphenicol (30 μg) from HiMedia Laboratories, India.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility of bacterial isolates against different antibiotics was tested by the disk diffusion method [modified Kirby-Bauer method] on Mueller Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, India) following standard procedures recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Wayne, USA [13 ]. Antibiotics that were tested in this study include ampicillin (Amp 10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamycin (Gen 10 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole/cotrimoxazole (COT30 μg), cloxacillin (5 μg), cefixime (CFM 5 μg), cefotaxime/ceftriaxone (CTX/CTR 30 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ 30 μg), chloramphenicol (C 30 μg), azithromycin (AZM 15 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIT 100/10 μg), imipenem (IPM 10 μg), meropenem (MRP 10 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), and polymyxin B (PB 300 U) from HiMedia Laboratories, India. Interpretations of antibiotic susceptibility results were made according to the guidelines of interpretative zone diameters of CLSI [13 ]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as the control organisms for antibiotic sensitivity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Clinical Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests of the clinical isolates against different antimicrobials were performed in Müller–Hinton agar (MHA) using the standard disk diffusion technique (modified Kirby–Bauer method) and interpreted as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.16 The following antimicrobial agents were tested: ampicillin (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), doxycycline (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), minocycline (30 μg), rifampicin (5 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg) and vancomycin (30 μg) (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as the control organism.
Isolates were considered multidrug resistant (MDR) based on the guidelines recommended by the joint initiative of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).17 (link) According to those guidelines, the isolates showing non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories were identified as MDR.
S. aureus isolates showing positive D zone test were considered as resistant to clindamycin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility of bacterial isolates against different antibiotics was determined by the disk diffusion method [modified Kirby-Bauer method] on Mueller Hinton agar (HiMedia, India) following standard procedures recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Wayne, USA [12 ]. For this purpose, the following antibiotics with specified concentrations were used: ampicillin (10 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole/cotrimoxazole (25 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), high level gentamycin (120 μg), amikacin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cloxacillin (5 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), imipenem (10 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), polymixin B (300 units), and colistin sulphate (10 μg) from HiMedia Laboratories, India. Interpretations of antibiotic susceptibility results were made according to the guidelines of interpretative zone diameters of CLSI [12 ]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as the control organisms for antibiotic sensitivity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from Broiler Chickens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To isolate C. jejuni, the cecal content of commercial broiler chickens was collected and processed (Singh and Mallick, 2019 (link)). Processed samples were plated onto a blood Free Campylobacter Selectivity Agar Base medium (HiMedia, India) supplemented with CAT selective supplement (cefoperazone 8 mg/L, amphotericin 10 mg/L, and teicoplanin 4 mg/L) (HiMedia, India) and incubated for 36-48 h at 42°C. Colonies were examined for characteristic morphological appearance followed by biochemical analysis including catalase, oxidase, and hippurate hydrolysis test. Further, selected colonies were checked for the presence of 16S rRNA and other major genes encoding virulence factors (GEVFs), including hipO, cadF, ciaB genes.
The standard C. jejuni strain (NCTC 11168; Genbank ID: AL111168.1) was obtained through the NIH Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Repository, NIAID, NIH: Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni, Strain NCTC 11168, NR-126.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pediatric VRE Colonization Surveillance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the study period, 1290 patients were admitted in the PICU, out of which 1018 patients stayed >48 h. As calculated sample size was 196, convenient sampling was carried out to achieve the sample size. Rectal swabs were collected after 48 h of admission to PICU and inoculated onto bile esculin sodium azide agar containing 6mg/L vancomycin (Himedia laboratories, Mumbai, India).[5 (link)] Black/brown colonies were presumptively identified as Enterococcus and confirmed to species level based on Facklam and Collins standard biochemical tests.[24 (link)] Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin and teicoplanin was determined by agar dilution method for all the enterococcal isolates grown on BEA as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines.[25 ] MIC of ≥32 was considered as resistant to both vancomycin and teicoplanin. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to other antibiotics, namely, ampicillin, high-level gentamicin, tetracycline, and linezolid was also performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method.[26 ] Association of VRE colonization with demographic features of the patients and various risk factors for VRE colonization were assessed based on previous studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed antimicrobial susceptibility test of the isolates by the KirbyBauer method adhering to clinical and laboratory standard institute (CLSI) guidelines against following antimicrobial discs: amikacin (10 µg), cefalexin (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), linezolid (30 µg), and teicoplanin (30 µg) (HiMedia, India). We checked the quality of all the discs by testing them against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!