The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using aperio at turbo

1

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol for Lung Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antigen retrieval for staining was for 20 min at 100 °C in a 1 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 9 buffer. BRN2 (12137 S; CST) or MITF (D5G7V; CST) antibodies were diluted 1:100 in Da Vinci Green (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and incubated overnight at room temperature. Sections were then incubated in MACH 1 Universal HRP polymer (Biocare Medical) for 30 min, counterstained with Nova Red (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) followed by haematoxylin. Additional sections were also stained with haematoxylin and eosin following standard procedures. All stained sections were scanned with the Aperio AT Turbo (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) and images extracted in ImageScope v11 (Leica Biosystems). Total tumor area per lung was determined by staining fully serial sectioning formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lungs by IHC with a BRN2 antibody. After scanning with the Aperio AT Turbo the Genie macro for ImageScope (Leica Biosystems) was used to measure the total tumor area and total lung area per section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Eosinophils Across Staining Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All stained sections were scanned by the Aperio AT Turbo (Leica Microsystems). ImageScope 12.1(Leica Microsystems) was used to select 9 consecutive square areas for each case. The area of each small square area was fixed to 0.09 mm2 and the same selected areas were procured for assessment in the serial sections (Fig. 1). Counting eosinophil was performed by experienced pathologists.

Select the same area for quantitative assessment (×50).

All of the statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad prism 5. The counting data were not normally distributed showed by the Shapiro-Wilk’s test. Therefore, the Friedman test was performed to determine whether there were significant differences among the conventional HE, Chromotrope 2R, Congo red and MBPmAb IHC for the eosinophil counting data. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the pairwise comparisons, if the significant differences were noted. The Bonferroni correction was applied in pairwise comparisons and the adjusted p = 0.05/6 was considered significant. All tests were done using the two-tailed option. For all analyses, P < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Macrophage and αSMA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Harvested tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight and embedded in paraffin. All specimens were cut to 4‐μm‐thick sections and subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), ISH, and IHC (Ab information in Appendix Table S5). IHC and quantification of macrophages and αSMA expression were performed as previously described (Mori et al, 2006, 2008, 2014). Observations were made via digital whole slide scanning system (Aperio AT Turbo; Leica Microsystems, Tokyo, Japan) confocal microscopy (C2+ system; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan)]. Aperio eSlide Manager (Leica Microsystems), NIS‐Elements C software version 4.13 (Nikon Corp.), AR software version 4.0 (Nikon Corp.), or IMARIS 7.7.2 (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland) were used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Multinucleated Gonocytes in Testes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PND 3 testes were paraffin embedded. Serial sections of 4 µm were rehydrated and stained with H&E histological stain. Slides were digitally scanned with an Aperio AT Turbo (Leica Microsystems Inc., Concord, Ontario) at 40x magnification. To quantify the number of multinucleated gonocytes, the outlines of tubules were traced using ImageJ61 (link). Only perpendicular cross-sections were quantified. To determine if a tubule was perpendicular, the major and minor axis had to be within 10% of each other. Gonocytes were considered within the focal plane if they had clearly defined cytoplasm and borders.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Skin Sample Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Skin samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax, and sections (6 mm thick) were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Sections were digitally scanned using the Aperio AT-Turbo (Leica Microsystems, North Ryde, Australia). Image analyses were undertaken using Aperio ImageScope software version 10 (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA) and the Positive Pixel Count algorithm version 9 (Aperio Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histopathological Tumor Necrosis Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each surgical specimen was sectioned into approximately 0.5-cm slices in the coronal plane with the aid of a three-dimensional mold prepared from the fifth-week MRI. The primary section was then fixed in 10% buffered formalin, before being decalcified with 10% hydrochloric acid. The section was divided into approximately 2 × 1.5 cm pieces, which were processed into paraffin-embedded blocks in the standard manner. Individual histologic sections were cut from the blocks at 4-μm thickness, mounted on glass slides, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The glass slides were manually reviewed by a pathologist, and tumor necrosis was estimated according to standard procedures. Patients with ≥ 90% tumor necrosis were considered as good responders, whereas patients with < 90% tumor necrosis were considered as poor responders. The glass slides were subsequently digitally scanned (Aperio AT Turbo, Leica Biosystems, Vista, CA) for image processing and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying RIPK2 Expression in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H&E and IHC were carried out by the Cedars-Sinai Biobank & Translational Pathology core by following standardized protocols. For IHC staining of tissue microarrays, the anti-RIPK2 antibody (Sigma Aldrich #HPA015273) was used at 1:100 dilution. Stained slides were digitized using Aperio AT Turbo (Leica Biosystems). Cancer areas and normal glands were annotated by an expert pathologist (X.Y.) in the H&E images. The annotations were digitally transferred onto the IHC images, which were exported for image analysis in the Leica Tissue IA software package (Leica Biosystems). Protein expression was quantified by the mean 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining intensity of pixels in the annotated normal and tumor areas. DAB staining was automatically deconvolved from hematoxylin by the software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Eosinophil Infiltration and Degranulation Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from full thickness mucosa or LSM as previously described13 (link). Paraffin embedded full thickness mucosa was used in immunohistochemistry as previously described13 (link). Infiltrating intact eosinophils and eosinophil degranulation (i.e., the presence of free cytoplasmic granules and/or tissue deposition of eosinophil granule proteins) were assessed by immunohistochemistry using a mouse monoclonal anti-eosinophil peroxidase antibody (EPX-mAb) as previously described38 (link),39 . Tissue sections were digitized (Aperio AT Turbo, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) and images were generated using Aperio ImageScope software (version 11.2.0.780, Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Automated Immunohistochemistry for Tumor Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed using an automated stainer (Leica Bond Max, Leica Biosystems) staining for CD8 (Thermo, clone C8/144B, catalog no. MS-457-S, 1:20 dilution) and PD-L1 (pharmDx, clone 22C3, 1:40 dilution). Slides were stained using previously optimized conditions with appropriate positive and negative controls. Leica Bond Polymer Refine detection kit and DAB chromagen were used and counterstained with hematoxylin. Slides were scanned into an Aperio slide scanner (Aperio AT Turbo, Leica Biosystems) and analyzed with Aperio Image Toolbox software for CD8+ cell staining. Regions of invasive tumor and associated stroma were chosen for digital analysis, and quantification of cell density (cells/mm2) was performed. PD-L1 expression was scored as the percentage of positive cells with membranous or cytoplasmic staining pattern (0–100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal Staining and Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H&E staining was undertaken as described previously [52 (link)]. IHC for neutrophils was undertaken as described [52 (link)] using Ly6G primary antibody (Abcam Anti-Mouse Neutrophil antibody Clone: NIMP-R14 cat. No. ab2557, Cambridge, UK) and Ly6 secondary antibody (Biocare Medical Rat on Mouse HRP Polymer cat. no. RT517L, Concord, CA USA). ApopTag staining used the Millipore ApopTag Peroxidase In Situ Apoptosis Detection kit (cat. No. S7100 Temecula, CA, USA). IHC for CHIKV capsid (monoclonal antibody 5.5G9 [54 (link)]) and ZIKA envelope (monoclonal antibody 4G2 [55 (link)], was undertaken as described using NovaRed secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories ImmPACT NovaRed Peroxidase Substrate Kit cat. No. SK-4805 Burlingame, CA, USA). Slides were digitally scanned using Aperio AT Turbo (Leica Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!