The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Model p 2000

Manufactured by Sutter Instruments
Sourced in United States

The Model P-2000 is a programmable and automated micropipette puller designed for the fabrication of micropipettes, nanopipettes, and other fine-tipped glass instruments. It utilizes heat and gravity to pull and shape the glass capillary to the desired specifications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using model p 2000

1

Fabrication of pH-Sensitive Nano-Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single barrel: pH-sensitive nanomembrane probes were fabricated by pulling a borosilicate glass capillary (O.D. 1 mm, I.D. 0.58 mm) to micropipettes with a tip diameter of ~1 µm or nanopipettes with a diameter of ~100 nm using a laser-based puller (Model P-2000, Sutter Instruments Co., USA). Nanopipettes were pulled with a two-step protocol. Briefly, for the initial step, the parameters were: heat 350, filament 3, velocity 30 and delay 200. For the second step, they were: heat 350, filament 2, velocity 27, delay 160 and pull 250. It should be noted that these values are instrument-specific, and parameters would have to be optimised for each instrument in order to obtain similar nanopore.
Double barrel: Double-barrel pH nanoprobes were constructed from a double-barrel quartz theta capillary (O.D., 1.2 mm, I.D., 0.9 mm, Sutter Instruments), which was pulled with a laser-based P-2000 pipette puller (Sutter Instruments) using a single line program (heat 700, filament 3, velocity 45, delay 130, and pull 93) to produce sharp double-barrel nanopipettes. The size of each barrel of this pulled double-barrel nanopipette was about 100 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Patch-clamp Recording of Neuronal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed under visual control using oblique illumination on a Slicecope Pro2000 (Scientifica, Uckfield, East Sussex, UK) equipped with a 12-bit monochrome CMOS camera (Hamamatsu Model OrcaFlash). Borosilicate glass pipettes (Sutter Instrument BF100-58-10) with resistances ranging from 3–7 MΩ were pulled using a laser micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument Model P-2000). Pipettes were filled using a standard intracellular solution (in mM: 135 potassium gluconate, 4 KCl, 2 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 4 EGTA, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP; 280 mOsm kg−1; pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH). Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed using a MultiClamp 700B amplifier, filtered at 8 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz using a Digidata 1550A digitizer (Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Precision Microelectrode Stimulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrodes were pulled from a borosilicate glass microcapillary (1.00 mm; World Precision Instruments) using a laser puller (Sutter Instruments co. Model P-2000). Electrodes tips were were broken so that the final tip diameter of the stimulating electrode was around 10-15μm. The electrode was filled with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF). Two-separate electrodes were connected to two poles of the ISO-flex stimulus isolator (A.M.P.I.), and electrodes were glued by two-component epoxy so that the electrode tips are close to each other (within 1-2 mm). Only a single electrode tip was inserted and positioned in the brain explant using a micromanipulator (Scientifica, UK), and the other tip was left outside the brain. A train of short current pulses (2-5μA) for 50 milliseconds duration and 20 seconds inter stimulus intervals was applied to the target brain region, using a computer-controlled Arduino Due as a stimulus generator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Operando SICM Characterization of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The piezo scanner of the SICM setup
has been reported in our previous work.45 (link) The glass nanopipettes (aperture inner radius, 50 nm) were fabricated
from borosilicate glass capillaries (GC100F-15, Harvard Apparatus)
using a CO2 laser puller (Model P-2000, Sutter Instruments).
The SICM uses a nanopipette probe containing 1 M LiClO4 in a 1:2 volumetric mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethylene
carbonate (DEC). Li metal-coated Cu wire was inserted into the nanopipette
and used as the SICM working electrode. For the operando SICM measurement, sample potential, or current control during SICM
current detection is essential. The potential and current of the sample
LIB material (composite graphite electrode) were controlled by a potentiostat
(TM-3000, EC Frontier) and a homemade Labview program. Li metal was
used as reference and counter electrodes. The surface area of the
sample was 0.50 cm2. The potentials of SICM working and
LIB material working electrodes were controlled individually. The
reference electrode was shared by the potentiostat and the current
amplifier. The potential between the potentiostat working electrode
and the current amplifier working electrode was controlled using the
external bias input function of the current amplifier and Labview
program. The detail of the electric circuit is described in the Supporting
Information (Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fabrication of Quartz Nanopipettes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanopipettes were fabricated from quartz capillaries, with an outer and inner diameter of 1 mm and 0.5 mm respectively. A laser pipette puller (Model P-2000, Sutter Instrument, CA) was used for fabrication, using the following parameters: Line1 Heat=350, Fil=3, Vel=30 Del=220 Pull=0; Line2 Heat=400, Fil=2, Vel=20 Del=180 Pull=255, resulting in a pipette with an internal diameter of 200 nm (± 20 nm), Heat = 400, Fil = 4, Vel = 30, Del = 200, resulting in a pipette with an internal diameter of 800 nm (± 200 nm). The size of the nanopipette was calculated from its electric resistance in PBS buffer; a tip size around 100nm will generate an electronic resistance around 150 MΩ and a tip size around 800nm will generate an electronic resistance around 2 MΩ. The 800 nm tip size was large enough to prevent blockages during Aβ delivery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted AAV Delivery to Mouse Retina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of avertin (2, 2, 2-Tribromoethanol) and placed under a stereo microscope. 1 μl of AAV2-hSyn-DIO-hM3DGq-mCherry (4.6 × 1012 viral particles/ml, Roth lab, UNC Vector Core) or AAV2-CMV-DIO-mRuby-P2A-Melanopsin-FLAG (Robinson lab, UMBC) was placed on a piece of Parafilm and drawn into a 10-μl microcapillary tube (Sigma P0674) that had been pulled to a needle (Sutter Instruments, Model P-2000). The loaded needle was then placed in the holster of a pico-injector (Harvard Apparatus PLI-90). The needle punctured the eye posterior to the ora serrata and air pressure was used to drive the viral solution into the vitreous chamber of the eye to ensure delivery specifically to the retina. Mice recovered from surgery on a heating pad until they woke from anesthesia. All PLR experiments and confocal imaging were done at least 3 weeks following viral injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Patch-Clamp Analysis of hERG Currents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK-hERG cells were cultured on 12 mm glass coverslips coated with poly-l-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). IhERG was recorded in whole-cell voltage mode. Pipettes (Harvard apparatus, Holliston, USA) were pulled and polished (Model P-2000, Sutter instruments Co., Novato, USA) and had a resistance of 2–4 MΩ once filled with solution. Potassium currents were measured with Axopatch 200B (Axon Instruments, USA) and Clampex 10.0 software.59 The following protocol was used: holding potential was −80 mV, a hyperpolarizing step was applied for 50 ms at −120 mV to correct for leak currents. Thereafter 4 s test pulses between −80 mV and +60 mV in 10 mV increments were applied. And it was followed by a 5 s deactivation pulse at −50 mV. After 3.5 min when the current had stabilized a control measurement was done. Subsequently, acute treatment with 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 (1 μM) was applied with a flow of ∼1 mL min−1. Currents were measured at 3.5, 7 and 15 min. All measurements were obtained at room temperature (22 °C). Bath solution consisted of 140 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2 and adjusted to pH 7.4 (NaOH). Pipette solution consisted of 10 mM EGTA, 110 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 4 mM K2-ATP, 5.17 mM CaCl2, 1.42 mM MgCl2, 15 mM sucrose and adjusted to pH 7.2 (KOH). The data were quantified by Clampfit software.60
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Reliable GFI Dye Injection Technique

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GFI dye injections were performed similar to the previously published methods (Boerner and Godenschwege, 2011 ; Kennedy and Broadie, 2017 (link)). Briefly; glass electrodes (Kwik-Fil Borosilicate Glass 1B100F-4, World Precision Instruments) were pulled on a laser electrode puller (Model P-2000, Sutter Instrument) to 10 MΩ resistance (3 m KCl). Electrodes were filled with 0.25% tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-dextran (10 kDa; Life Technologies) and 7% neurobiotin (Vector Laboratories; RRID:AB_2313575) in double-distilled dH2O. Filled electrodes were placed on a silver chloride wire mounted on a PCS-5000 Micromanipulator (Burleigh). Animals in physiologic saline were cut along the dorsal midline to access the cervical connective (CC), at which electrodes were inserted into the GFI. A square-pulse stimulator (Grass S48, Astro-Med) provided 7.5 100 ms pulses/s for 2 min with the 20 nA injected current monitored by an AxoClamp2B Amplifier. A Digidata data acquisition system (1320A, Molecular Devices) was controlled with Clampex 9.2 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nano-LC-MS/MS for Peptide Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS experiments were performed on a nano-LC (EASY-nLC 1200, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a hybrid ion trap-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Orbitrap Velos, Thermo Scientific, USA). The capillary column (75 μm × 150 mm) with a laser-pulled electrospray tip (Model P-2000, Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA) was home-packed with 4 μm, 100 Å Magic C18AQ silica-based particles (Michrom BioResources Inc., Auburn, CA, USA). Peptide samples were reconstituted in Buffer A (described below) and approximately 200 ng of samples were loaded onto the analytical column in a single LC-MS/MS run. The mobile phase comprised of Buffer A (97% H2O, 3% ACN, and 0.1% FA) and Buffer B (100% ACN and 0.1% FA). The LC separation was carried out with the following gradient: Buffer B was started at 7% for 3 min, and then raised to 35% over 120 min. Subsequently, Buffer B was rapidly increased to 90% in 2 min and maintained for 10 min before 100% Buffer A was used for column equilibration. The mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent mode. One full MS scan (m/z 350–1500) was acquired by the Orbitrap mass analyzer with R = 60,000 and followed by fragmentation of the ten most intense ions in the ion trap under collision-induced dissociation (CID). Dynamic exclusion was enabled with repeat duration of 30 s and exclusion duration of 12 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Inducing Opn4 Expression in Mouse Retina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult Opn4Cre/+;Rosa26CAG-tdTomato-eGFP/+ mice (8–10 weeks) were anesthetized with isoflurane. The virus (Addgene plasmid pAAV-hSyn-Flpo, # 60663, (Xue et al., 2014 (link)), packaged into AAV2 at the NINDS Viral Production Core Facility) was placed on a piece of Parafilm and loaded into a glass microcapillary (Fisher Scientific, Cat. No. 11714) pulled needle (Sutter Instruments, Model P-2000). The glass needle was used to puncture the sclera of the right eye and 1.5μL of virus was injected into the vitreous chamber (Drummond Science Nanoinject II, Cat. No. 3–000-204). After 410 the injection, mice were recovered from anesthesia and placed back into their home cages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!