The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using vitablocs mark 2

1

Fabrication of Standardized CAD/CAM Ceramic Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 96 samples were prepared; 32 samples were CAD/CAM all-ceramic restorative materials i.e., Vita Enamic, Vitablocs Mark II, and Vita Suprinity (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). Thirty-two discs of standardized dimensions comprising of each restorative material of controlled/uniform size were milled, consisting of 10 mm × 10 mm ± 0.2 diameters and thickness in the range of 2.0 ± 0.2 mm, following the manufacturer’s instructions using a CAD/CAM machine (Amann Girrbach, Germany) and glazed (Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of CAD/CAM Porcelain Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CAD/CAMs materials were Vita Suprinity, Vita Enamic, and Vitablocs® Mark II materials (Vita Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter Bad Säckingen, Germany). Fifty-four (19 in each group) specimens of machinable CAD/CAMs porcelain blocks were cut into square slices of 1.5 mm ±0.2 thickness and dimension of 12×14 mm using a CAD/CAMs machine (Amann Girrbach, GmbH, Durrenweg 40 75177 Pforzheim, Deutchland). Next, all specimens underwent finishing and polishing by 300- to 800-grit silicon carbide papers to achieve uniform thickness. Afterwards, all specimens were sintered in a furnace (Programat P310; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, H. Rauter Bad Säckingen, Germany) for 2 h at 1550°C, in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens from every group were subdivided into 2 equal subgroups of 9 each on the basis of surface types (glazed or polished).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluation of Ceramic Crown Systems on Premolars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth with no caries or anatomical defects were divided into two groups based on the finish line design [Table 1]; Group 1: 90° shoulder and Group 2: 135° chamfer. Furthermore, each group was divided into three groups to receive three different types of full ceramic crowns; Group A: Cerec inLab feldspathic ceramic system (Vitablocs Mark II, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Almanya); Group B: Cerec inLab aluminum oxide ceramic system (Vita In-Ceram 2000 AL, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Almanya) and Group C: Lithium disilicate press ceramic system (IPS e.Max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation of Ceramic Slabs for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Square/rectangular ceramic slabs (5 mm long, height 1 mm) were cut from feldspathic ceramic blocks (VITABLOCS Mark II from VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany). These slabs were polished with sandpapers (240–4000 grit). For cleaning and disinfection purpose, the samples were placed in the ultrasonicator and immersed in isopropanol (70%) for 15 min, followed by ultrasonication with distilled water and finally dried before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Ceramic Material Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Groups 1 and 2 (G1 and G2) were assembled from feldspathic ceramic material (Vitablocs® Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany); groups 3 and 4 (G3 and G4) comprised lithium disilicate ceramic blocks (IPS e. max ® CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and groups 5 and 6 (G5 and G6) comprised zirconia blocks (3M LavaTM Aesthetic, 3M Deutschland GmbH, Neuss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fabrication and Characterization of CAD/CAM Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 81 glazed samples were prepared, with 27 of each of the 3 CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials: IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter Bad Säckingen, Germany), and Vitablocs Mark II (Vita Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter Bad Säckingen, Germany). All samples were manufactured using a CAD/CAM machine (Amann Girrbach, Germany). Blocks of material were installed on a milling machine (CAM) to produce 27 blocks from each material with a uniform and standardized dimensional size (16×12 mm) and thickness (2.1 mm) for each restorative material, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were finished and smoothed with 300 to 800 grit silicon carbide paper (Dentsply Prosthetics Brasseler USA). After cleaning with distilled water in an ultrasonic machine, the samples were washed with isopropanol to remove any grease residue and were then dried with compressed air. The Vita Suprinity and Vitablocs Mark II samples were sintered for 2 h at 1550°C in a furnace (Programat P310; Ivoclar Vivadent AG), while the lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent AG) blocks were crystallized, as recommended by the manufacturer. All samples of each group were further divided into 3 equal subgroups of 9 each according to the miswak oral hygiene aid type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Adhesive Techniques for CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Table 1 lists the product name, composition, lot number, and manufacturer for each material used in this study. An all-in-one adhesive system (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick; Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) was used alone or in combination with a flowable resin composite (Clearfil Majesty ES Flow; Kuraray Noritake Dental) for IDS treatment. An adhesive resin cement (PANAVIA SA Cement Universal; Kuraray Noritake Dental) that demonstrated self-adhesive ability not only to dentin but also to various restorative materials (e.g., ceramics, resin composite, metal alloy) was used for the luting of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations. The pretreatment of the inner surface of the restorative prior to luting was performed using 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (Porcelain Etchant; BISCO, Schaumburg, IL, USA). A typical chair-side CAD/CAM system (CEREC AC Omnicam SW v4.5 and CEREC MC XL; Dentsply Sirona, York, PA, USA) was used for the scanning, designing, and fabrication of the ceramic crown. A feldspathic ceramic block (VITABLOCS Mark II; VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) was selected as the material for the CAD/CAM crown. All light irradiation procedures were performed with a light-emitting diode (LED) curing source (G-Light Prima II, GC, Tokyo, Japan) in the normal mode (870 mW/cm2) after the confirmation of the light intensity prior to each irradiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Evaluation of Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifteen dental materials were tested and included the following: feldspar ceramic (VITABLOCS® Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany), lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e. max® CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) pre-sintered and post-sintered, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic (Celtra Duo, Dentsply Sirona, York, PA, USA) pre-sintered and post-sintered, hybrid ceramic (VITA ENAMIC®, VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany), zirconia 3Y-TZP (3D pro-Zir®, Aidite technology, Qinhuangdoo, China), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Ceramill® temp, Amann Girrbach North America, Charlotte, NC, USA), bis-acrylic composite (Protemp™ 4, 3 M, Saint Paul, MN, USA), packable composite resin (Grandio, VOCO Gmbh, Cuxhaven, Germany), and flowable composite resin (Grandio Flow, VOCO Gmbh, Cuxhaven, Germany), gutta-percha (Obtura Flow 150®, Obtura Spartan Endodontics, Algonquin, Il, USA), glass ionomer composite liner (Ionoseal®, VOCO America, Indian Land, SC, USA), resin-modified glass ionomer restorative (Fuji II LC®, GC America, Alsip, IL, USA), amalgam (Permite, SDI Limited, Victoria, Australia). Each material was configured into 2 × 2x2 mm cubes (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).

Complete workflow of the testing process.

Fig. 1

A simplified version of the testing process.

Fig. 2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fabrication of CAD/CAM Ceramic Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 96 specimens were manufactured from B2 Vita shade of 3 CAD/CAM restorative materials (32 specimens from each material): Vita Suprinity, Vita Enamic, and Vitablocs Mark II (Vita Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter, Bad Säckingen, Germany). The specimens were fabricated using a CAD/CAM machine (Amann Girrbach GmbH, Dürrenweg, Pforzheim, Germany). The blocks were installed on a milling machine to produce specimens of identical size and shape (16 mm in width and 2.0±0.1 mm thickness) for each ceramic material. Then, the specimens were sintered and glazed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Standardized Dental Restoration Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The model of the upper arch was made of resin extending from half of the first molar to half of the first molar. The 18% gray color of resin was selected to reduce the scattering light around the samples. The space of the right central incisor (tooth number 11) was prepared to replace by milled restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM. To fabricate the central incisor, first, the model was scanned by an intraoral scanner (Trios 3 Basic, 3Shape®, Copenhagen, Denmark). Second, the STL files were used to fabricate 30 milled restorations. Vitablocs® mark II (VITA Zahnfabrik®, Bad Sackingen, Germany) which is a monochromic feldspar ceramic was utilized because of the various shade providence in the market. Nine possible VITA 3D-Master shades including 1M1, 1M2, 2M1, 2M2, 2M3, 3M1, 3M2, 3M3, and 4M2 were used to fabricate 30 teeth. The identical size and shape of those milled restorations were double-checked by the measurement from the vernier caliper. The tooth was retained in the model by friction to minimize the adjustment of the restoration and the referent points were marked. The cross-section of the imaginary lines, at the middle third of the tooth, was indicated as a shade measuring point (Figure 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!