The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using ab175388

1

CD47 Expression in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cases with a pathological diagnosis of UTUC by surgical resection between August 2018 and September 2020 at our center were collected. Excluding cases with high-grade and low-grade coexistence or with histological variants and excluding cases with concomitant bladder cancer, paraffin-embedded specimens and clinical data of 57 tumors and 20 contemporaneous normal uroepithelial cases were finally included. The tissue blocks were sectioned into 4-μm-thick sections, placed on adhesion slides, deparaffinized, rehydrated, heat antigen retrieval, and endogenous peroxidase-inactivated. Incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-CD47 (1:100, ab175388, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C, followed by exposure to horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled IgG (1:500, ab6721, Abcam) for 30 min. Finally, the antibodies were visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) and counterstained with hematoxylin. A double-blind method was used to observe the results, and five non-overlapping staining fields were randomly selected for each IHC section at ×400 field of view for observation. The mean optical density (ratio of signal intensity to area) was analyzed with Image Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA) under uniform conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Gene Transfection Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the gene transfection efficiency of different preparations, GL261 Cells were seeded in 6-well plates with a concentration of 1.0 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 18 h. 160 μL naked pDNA, lipo2000-pDNA (2), lipo-pDNA (N/P = 2) and lipo-pDNA (N/P = 4) of an equivalent pDNA dose of 2.5 μg/μL with 2 mL serum-free medium were added into each well for 6 h incubation. Fresh serum containing complete culture medium was used to continue the culture for 72 h. Then we collected GL261 cells and obtained cellular proteins using T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Pierce). The total protein concentration was then quantified by a BCA protein assay kit. Western blot tests were processed in the standard fashion, and analyzed quantitatively protein expressions by the ImageJ software. The following antibodies were used in the procedure: CD47 (ab175388, Abcam), GAPDH (ab181602, Abcam), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (31210, Thermo Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Antibody Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as described [51 (link)]. Antibodies used were mouse anti-GAPDH (1:10000, ab8245), anti-SRSF10 (1:1000, ab77209), rabbit anti-E2F1 (1:1000, ab179445), anti-CD47 (1:1000, ab175388) from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), anti-IκBα (1:1000, 4814), anti-Phospho-IκBα (1:1000, 9246), anti-NF-κB p65 (1:1000, 8242), anti-Phospho-NF-κB p65 (1:1000, 3033) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

IHC Scoring for SRSF10 and CD47

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed as previously reported [51 (link)]. Anti-SRSF10 (1:200, GTX47232, GeneTex, San Antonio, USA) or anti-CD47 (1:100, ab175388, Abcam) antibodies were used. Each tumor was assigned with a score according to the intensity of the nuclei or cytoplasm staining (0 = no staining, 1 = weak staining, 2 = moderate staining, and 3 = strong staining) and the proportion of stained tumor cells (0 = 0%, 1 = 1–10%, 2 = 11–50%, 3 = 51–80%, and 4 = 81–100%), as judged independently by two pathologists in a blinded manner. The final immunoreactive score was determined by multiplying the intensity scores by the extent of positivity scores of stained cells, with “−” for a score of 0, “+” for a score of 1–4, “++” for a score of 5–8 and “+++” for a score of 9–12. Tumors with scores ≥5 were classified into the high expression group, whereas the others were classified into the low expression group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Characterization via SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The retained proteins were characterized by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The protein samples of MM@PCM/RAP, macrophage membrane (MM) and macrophage were extracted by RIPA lysis buffer contained PMSF. After adding the loading buffer, the protein samples were transferred to a metal bath at 95 °C for 10 min to fully denature the protein. Subsequently, 20 μL of each sample was loaded onto the pre-configured 10% gel. Gels were run at 140 V for 60 min to separate protein bands of different molecular weights. Bands were visualized using Coomassie brilliant blue.
The CCR2, integrin α4, integrin β1 and CD47 on the cell membrane were characterized by western blot (WB). Briefly, after separate protein bands in 8% gel, the proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane at 90 mA for 90 min. The PVDF membrane was blocked with 5% milk for 2 h and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibody of CCR2 (1:1000, ab203128, Abcam), integrin α4 (1:1000, ab81280, Abcam), integrin β1 (1:1000, ab179471, Abcam) and CD47 (1:1000, ab175388, Abcam). The following day, membranes were incubated with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000, ab6721, Abcam) for 1 h and observed by ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio-Rad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD24, CD47, and PD-L1 in Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD24, CD47, and PD‐L1 expression in tumors were stained by immunohistochemistry using formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tumor tissue specimens. The BenchMark XT used in the immunostaining performed deparaffinization of tissue sections at 75°C using EZ Prep buffer (Ventana Medical System). Antigen retrieval was achieved in Tris‐EDTA base buffer, pH 8.5 (Cell Conditioning 1) for 60 min at 95°C. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% H2O2 for 10 min. The primary CD24 antibody (ab31622; Abcam plc) and CD47 antibody (ab175388; Abcam) were diluted 1:100 and 1:1500 and incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The immunohistochemical reaction was visualized using the Ultraview Universal Diaminobenzidine (DAB) IHC Detection Kit in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. Patients with known reactivity to antibodies were included as positive controls, and negative controls were obtained by omitting the primary antibody.
CD24, CD47, and PD‐L1 expression in tumor cells were judged to be positive if membranous staining was present and evaluated by TPS, which is the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining. All pathological evaluation was made independently by 2 pathologists (YK and JF) and results were determined by consensus. Both clinical and pathological data were masked at the time of scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Membrane Protein Characterization by SDS-PAGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The membrane proteins were characterized by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The membrane proteins of the MM vesicles and MM/RAPNPs were extracted by Cell Total Protein Extraction kits. The extracted membrane proteins were run on a 4-12% Bis-Tris 10-well minigel in running buffer using a Bio-Rad electrophoresis system at 75 V for 0.5 h and then at 140 V for 1 h. Finally, the resulting polyacrylamide gel was stained with SimplyBlue overnight for visualization.
Furthermore, the integrin α4β1 and CD47 contents in RAW264.7 cells, MMs, MM/RAPNPs and RAPNPs were determined by western blot analysis. The total protein of the lysis solution from 1 × 107 RAW264.7 cells, RAPNPs, MMs extracted from 1 × 107 cells and the subsequent MM/RAPNPs were extracted by Cell Total Protein Extraction kits and used for measurements. Samples underwent electrophoresis on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, USA). Then, the membranes were treated with primary antibodies against α4 (anti-integrin α4, 8440S, CST), β1 (anti-integrin β1, 34971, CST), and CD47 (anti-CD47 antibody, ab175388, Abcam), followed by horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat/anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). The protein signals were measured by the enhanced chemiluminescence method using a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Stem Cell Marker Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used in the study including anti-CXCR4 (ab124824, AbCam), anti-TRAIL (AF1121, R&D), anti-c-Kit (AF1356, Novus Biological), anti-CD47 (ab175388, Abcam), anti-Fasl (ab15285, Abcam), anti-PDL1 (NBP1-76769, Novus Biological), anti-CD4 (ab183685, Abcam), anti-SSEA1 (ab16285, Abcam), anti-Oct4 (ab184665, Abcam), anti-Sox2 (MAB2018R-100, R&D), anti-Nanos3 (ab70001, Abcam), anti-Ifitm3 (ab109429, Abcam), anti-Stellar (Invitrogen, PA5-34601), anti-PRDM14 (ab187881, Abcam), anti-Vasa (ab27591, Abcam), anti-DAZL (NB100-2437, Novus biologicals), anti-SMAD2 (ab33875, Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

IHC Analysis of CD47 and IFN-γ Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed on 5-μm sections of tissue specimens following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and washed with 10 mM PBS. An isotype-matched monoclonal antibody (mAb) (Iso, anti-rabbit IgG mAb, Equitech-Bio, Kerrville, TX, USA) with no specific affinity to proteins of interest was used as the negative control. Antibodies against CD47 (ab175388, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and IFN-γ (15365-1-AP, Proteintech, Wuhan, China) as well as the isotype control mAbs were diluted in 5% bovine serum albumin at 25 μg/mL and immobilized on tissue slides at 4°C overnight. For defining the CD47 expression stage, intensity of staining was categorized as 0 (no immunostaining), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong); the percentage of chromatists cells as 0 (none), 1 (1%–10%), 2 (11%–50%), 3 (51%–80%) and 4 (>80%). Multiply these 2 numbers: 0–2 is considered (−); 3–4 (+); 5–8 (++); and 9–12 (+++). A range of 0–1+ was considered as negative expression, while 2–3+ was positive expression.48 (link) Staining was evaluated by two pathologists in a blinded fashion. The average integrated optical density (IOD) of CD47 and IFN-γ IHC staining in cancer and normal tissue sections were calculated with Image-Pro Plus software (version 5.0, Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). Five fields were analyzed per slide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomics Analysis of Macrophage-Derived Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins of macropahge cells (MCs), MVs and MM/RNPs were extracted by a protein extraction kit (Beyotime). For sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), the protein samples and marker were loaded on the SDS-PAGE gel and run at 90 V for 0.5 h and then run at 140 V for 1 h using a Bio-Rad electrophoresis system. Finally, the gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue and washed for 3 times before visualization.
For western blotting (WB) analysis, proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF membrane, Millipore, USA) from SDS-PAGE gel. Next, the PVDF membranes were blocked in 5% milk for 1 h before incubating with primary antibody (anti-integrin α4 (8440S, CST); anti-integrin β1 (34971, CST); anti-CD47 antibody (ab175388, Abcam)) at 4°C overnight. Afterwards, the membranes were washed with PBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) for 2 h. Finally, the membranes were washed with PBST again and observed by ChemiDoc-XRS imaging system (Bio-Rad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!