The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pro q emerald 300

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Pro-Q Emerald 300 is a sensitive fluorescent stain used to detect glycoproteins in gels. It is designed to specifically bind and stain glycoproteins, allowing for their visualization and identification in complex protein samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using pro q emerald 300

1

Quantitative Analysis of Bacterial LOS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were cultured to A600 ~0.5. One milliltre was harvested by centrifugation, washed with PBS, then repelleted and resuspended in a volume of 1× Novex Tricine SDS sample buffer (Invitrogen) normalized for cell density (50 µl per 1 ml A600 0.5). Samples were boiled for 15 min and either cooled on ice (no proteinase K) or incubated with proteinase K (NEB) at 55 °C for 1 h. Samples were re-boiled and electrophoresed using the tricine buffer system with Novex tricine 16%-acrylamide gels (Invitrogen). Spectra Multicolor Low Range Protein Ladder (Thermo) was included to indicate approximate molecular weights. Gels were fixed, washed, stained using Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen), and imaged using UV transillumination (Biorad Chemidoc MP). Gels were subsequently stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue for detection of total protein. Image lab software (Biorad) was used to quantify LOS or total protein intensity levels. Samples were normalized by dividing the LOS intensity level of each band region by the total protein level from Coomassie staining. Relative values were calculated by dividing each normalized LOS value by the total normalized LOS levels in WT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Silencing of Leptospira Virulence Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Virulent, low passage L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni strain Fiocruz L1-130 were transformed by conjugation with conjugative E. coli β2163 cells containing the plasmids pMaOri.dCas9sgLipL32 or pMaOri.dCas9sgLigAB for silencing of LipL32 and both LigA and LigB, respectively. As a no-silencing control, pMaOri.dCas9 was also used. Protospacers contained in sgRNA cassettes to target genes encoding LipL32, LigA, and LigB, conjugation protocols and mutant recovery were previously described by Fernandes et al. (2021) (link). Mutants were confirmed by PCR with primers pMaOri2 F (5′ACGCAATGTATCGATACCGAC 3′) and R (5′ATAGGTGAAGTAGGCCCACCC 3′) flanking the sgRNA cassette and by immunoblotting of cell extracts (5 × 107 cells/lane) with rabbit polyclonal anti-LipL32, anti-LigAB Fernandes and anti-LipL41 (loading control). Lipopolysaccharide was visualized by staining bacterial cell extracts (5 × 107 cells) with Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen, CA, United States) as per the manufacturer’s guidelines. For downstream experiments, including animal infection, all mutants, and wild type containing pMaOri.dCas9 without sgRNA, were synchronized regarding their in vitro passage and conjugation experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteinase K Treatment for LPS Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
 SDS Loading buffer was added to 100 µL of fraction to a final concentration of 1X. 2 units of proteinase K was then added and samples incubated overnight at 55°C. 10 µL of sample were separated via SDS-PAGE using a 10% polyacrylamide gel. Staining for LPS was done using ProQ-Emerald 300 per manufacturer instructions (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Leptospira Outer Membrane Enrichment and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fractionation of L. interrogans strain RJ19115 to enrich for outer membrane (OM) proteins was performed using Triton X-114 as previously described (Nally et al., 2001 (link)). OM enriched fractions were compared to whole leptospires by 1-D gel electrophoresis as previously described (Monahan et al., 2008 (link)). Proteins were visualized by staining with Sypro Ruby (Invitrogen, CA) and lipopolysaccharide was visualized by staining with Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen, CA) as per manufacturer's guidelines. For immunoblotting, samples were transferred to Immobilon-P transfer membrane (Millipore, 220 Bedford, MA) and blocked overnight at 4°C with StartingBlock (TBS) blocking buffer (Thermo Scientific, CO). Membranes were individually incubated with indicated antisera (anti-LipL21, anti-LipL32 and anti-LipL41 at 1:4,000, anti-Treponema FlaA at 1:2,000, or a pool of sera from infected or non-infected rats at 1:1,000, in PBS-T for 1 h at room temperature), followed by incubation with horseradish-peroxidase anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugate or horseradish-peroxidase anti-rat immunoglobulin G conjugate (Sigma, MO). Bound conjugates were detected using Clarity Western ECL substrate (BioRad, CA) and images acquired using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Leptospiral Protein and LPS Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leptospires (mid-late log phase, 1–3 × 108 leptospires/ml) were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 4°C, 30 min), washed twice with Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and processed for one-dimensional (1-D) Sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 12% acrylamide gels (BioRad, Hercules, CA, U.S.A.) as per the guidelines by the manufacturer. Proteins were visualized by staining with Sypro Ruby (Invitrogen) and LPS was visualized by staining with Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen) as per manufacturer's guidelines. For immunoblotting, samples were transferred by semi-dry transfer (Amersham TE77 PWR) to Immobilon-P transfer membrane (Millipore, 220 Bedford, MA, U.S.A.) and blocked overnight at 4°C with Starting Block (PBS) blocking buffer (Thermo Fisher). Membranes were individually incubated with indicated antisera diluted in blocking buffer (anti-LipL32 at 1:4,000, or anti-Tarassovi, anti-Hardjo, or anti-Ballum at 1:1,000) followed by incubation with horseradish-peroxidase anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A) conjugate diluted 1:4,000 in blocking buffer. Bound conjugates were detected using Clarity Western ECL substrate (BioRad) and images were acquired using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Glycoprotein Analysis by SDS-PAGE and Immunoblot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analyses were performed as previously described (Shoji et al., 2011 (link)). The blotted membranes were treated with anti-TfsA and anti-TfsB antisera (Sakakibara et al., 2007 (link)).
The glycoproteins in SDS-PAGE gels were stained using the Pro-Q Emerald 300 fluorescent stain (Invitrogen). After staining with Pro-Q Emerald 300, total protein staining was performed with SYPRO Ruby (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting of Leptospires

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leptospires (mid-late log phase, 1–3 × 108 leptospires/mL) were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 4°C, 30 min), washed twice with PBS, and processed for one-dimensional (1-D) SDS-PAGE on 12% acrylamide gels (BioRad) as per manufacturer's guidelines. Proteins were visualized by staining with Sypro Ruby (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and lipopolysaccharide was visualized by staining with Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen, CA) as per manufacturer's guidelines. For immunoblotting, samples were transferred by semi-dry transfer (Amersham TE77 PWR) to Immobilon-P transfer membrane (Millipore, 220 Bedford, MA) and blocked overnight at 4°C with Starting Block (PBS) blocking buffer (Thermo Scientific, CO) (25 (link)).
Membranes were individually incubated with indicated antisera diluted in blocking buffer (anti-LipL32 at 1:4,000, or anti-Alexi, anti-Hardjo at 1:1,000) followed by incubation with horseradish-peroxidase anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugate diluted 1:4,000 in blocking buffer (Sigma, MO). Bound conjugates were detected using Clarity Western ECL substrate (BioRad, CA) and images acquired using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Lipopolysaccharide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LOS was analyzed via Tricine gel electrophoresis of cell lysates as described [41 (link)]. Log phase bacteria were washed with PBS, resuspended with Novex tricine SDS sample buffer (Invitrogen, 50μl 1X buffer per 0.5 OD units of bacteria), and boiled for 15 minutes. Samples were separated on Novex 16% tricine gels (Invitrogen) and stained with Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen). Gels were imaged using UV transillumination (ChemiDoc MP). Total protein detected with subsequent Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining was used for sample normalization. Relative values were calculated by dividing each normalized LOS value by the total normalized LOS levels in WT [41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LOS Profiling via Tricine Gel Electrophoresis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LOS profiles were examined using Tricine gel electrophoresis of cell lysates as previously described (36 (link)), using lysates from cells grown to mid-logarithmic phase. After fractionation on Novex 16% tricine gels (Invitrogen), the gels were stained with Pro-Q Emerald 300 (Invitrogen) for LOS staining, and Coomassie Brilliant Blue for total protein staining for sample quantification normalization (36 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Glycoprotein Analysis by SDS-PAGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gels were utilized for this analysis. Pro-Q® Emerald 300, a periodic acid-based stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific), was used to stain for glycosylation. Standard laboratory reagents and techniques were utilized for Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!