The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ab243903

1

IHC Staining of NECTIN2, TIGIT, CD163, LAIR1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections, as previously described70 (link)–72 , using anti-NECTIN2 (Sigma-Aldrich, HPA012759, 1:300), anti-TIGIT (Abcam, Ab243903, 1:200), anti-CD163 (Abcam, Ab189915, 1:500), and anti-LAIR1 (Sigma-Aldrich, HPA011155, 1:500) rabbit antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TIGIT Immunohistochemistry in ATC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four-micrometer-thick sections were cut from the paraffin blocks, deparaffinized, and then pretreated with EDTA-buffer at pH 9.0 for 20 min. The sections were incubated with rabbit monoclonal antibody against TIGIT (catalog no. ab243903, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Simultaneously, some ATC tissues were incubated with pancytokeratin AE1/AE3 (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) on their corresponding serial sections. We used 3,3’-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for specific immunostaining, and finally counterstained with hematoxylin. The total staining process was carried out on a Leica BOND-MAX immunostainer (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK). Tonsil tissue was used as a positive control, and an additional section from the corresponding block without primary antibody was used as a negative control for TIGIT. The same two pathologists also reviewed the positive and negative controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of TIGIT Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues was done by the Envision Detection System (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA). After dewaxing and hydration, incubation of tissue sections in the presence of 3% H2O2 was done for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase activities. Retrieval of the antigen was done by microwaving the samples in citrate buffer. The tissues were then blocked using 10% normal goat serum for 1 h before incubation with anti-TIGIT primary antibody (ab243903, Abcam, 1:200) at 4°C, overnight. Negative control samples were subjected to the same treatment, but without the primary antibody. They were then incubated at room temperature (RT) with secondary antibody (1:500) for 2h. Signal was then developed using freshly prepared diaminobenzidine (DAB), and sections lightly counterstained with hematoxylin. The resulting solution was then washed fully with water after differentiation till it turned blue; routine dehydration and transparence was performed followed by neutral gum mounting. They were then examined and imaged on a Leica DM 3000 microscope and analysis was done using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Staining of FFPE Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence staining, the slides are deparaffinized and rehydrated with graded ethanol and the process of antigen retrieval and non-specific binding blocking is the same as the previous IHC.
For the multiplexed immunofluorescence of CD4, CD8, PD-1, TIM3, TIGIT, and DAPI (for nuclear staining) in the FFPE tissue, we used a validated multiple fluorescence staining kit from Servicebio (Wuhan, China), according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-human PD-1 (Abcam, ab52587, 1:200), rabbit anti-human TIGIT (Abcam, ab243903, 1:200), rabbit anti-human TIM3 (Abcam, ab185703, 1:400), and rabbit anti-human CD8 (Abcam, ab4055, 1:200). After the slides are incubated with each primary antibody and the corresponding HRP-labeled secondary antibody, the slides need to be labeled with different fluorescent dyes. The sample scanning, spectral unmixing, and quantification of signals were conducted with the panoramic MIDI Pathology Imaging System, using the CaseViewer V.2.3 software of 3DHISTECH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Tumor TIGIT Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 60 min after injection of 68Ga-GP12, slices of tumor samples were acquired and exposed to a phosphor imaging plate for 1 h, which was subsequently visualized using a Sapphire biomolecular imager. The formaldehyde-prefixed tumor samples were processed and stained using an anti-TIGIT antibody (BOSTER, A01962-1) for mice and anti-TIGIT antibody [BLR047F] (Abcam, ab243903) for humans. Leica ST5020 multistainer (Heidelberg, Germany) was employed for H&E staining. Zeiss AX10 bright field microscope was used to capture histology images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TIGIT Expression in Tumor Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TIGIT expression in tumor tissue and adjacent normal tissue was detected by IHC. Briefly, tissue sections were deparaffinized, hydrated, and antigen retrieved with a citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After washing with PBS buffer and blocking with 10% goat serum, 70 μL anti-TIGIT primary antibody (ab243903; 1:200; Abcam) was added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Then, a secondary antibody included in the Dako K5007 kit was added. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min and rinsed with PBS buffer. Afterwards, the sections were incubated with 3.3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB), counterstained with hematoxylin, rinsed with running water and differentiated with 0.5% hydrochloric acid alcohol for 3–5 sec. Then, the sections were washed again with running water for 15 min, dehydrated, and mounted, and finally, were observed under an inverted optical microscope (Olympus, XDS-1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of TIGIT Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from the cell lines using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The protein content was evaluated by BCA method using a commercial kit purchased from Bioteke (Beijing, China). Protein (20 μg) was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels, and then was transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, USA) and blocked with 5% skimmed milk under room temperature. Subsequently, rabbit monoclonal primary antibodies against TIGIT (ab243903; 1:4000; Abcam) and against α-tubulin (66,031; 1:10,000; Proteintech, China) were added and incubated overnight at 4°C. PVDF membrane was washed four times with TBST for 5 min each time and then incubated with goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. After washing PVDF membrane for four times, immunoreactive bands were displayed by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL), photographed in grayscale and quantified using the Image J program (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The α-tubulin was used as an internal reference to normalize bands. The ratio of IOD TIGIT/IOD α-tubulin indicated the relative expression of TIGIT protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of TIGIT Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry on formalin-xed, para n-embedded tissues was done by the Envision Detection System (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA). After dewaxing and hydration, incubation of tissue sections in the presence of 3% H 2 O 2 was done for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase activities. Retrieval of the antigen was done by microwaving the samples in citrate buffer. The tissues were then blocked using 10% normal goat serum for 1 h before incubation with anti-TIGIT primary antibody (ab243903, Abcam, 1:200) at 4°C, overnight. Negative control samples were subjected to the same treatment, but without the primary antibody. They were then incubated at room temperature (RT) with secondary antibody (1:500) for 2h. Signal was then developed using freshly prepared diaminobenzidine (DAB), and sections lightly counterstained with hematoxylin. water wash and wash fully with water after differentiation till return blue; routine dehydration and transparence; neutral gum mounting. They were then examined and imaged on a Leica DM 3000 microscope and analysis done using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!