The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using ultraview dab

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of sLex in Human Lung

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human lung sections were immunolabeled for sLex as described,53 (link) with an antibody directed against CD15s (BD Pharmingen; CSLEX1) and ultraView DAB (Ventana Medical Systems).54 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hes1 Expression Evaluation by IHC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of Hes1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on all cases included in this study. The IHC was performed by the Immunohistochemistry Diagnostic Laboratory of University Hospitals Case Medical Center. Tissue slides were processed using a BenchMark Ultra automated immunostainer (Ventana, Tucson, AZ). Slides were deparaffinized, antigen retrieved with standard Cell Conditioning 1 (Ventana Medical Systems, AZ), a tris-based buffer pH 8.3 solution for 64 minutes at 95 C, then incubated at 37 C with the primary antibody HES1 rabbit monoclonal (1:200 dilution, Catalog #2922-1, clone EPR4226 from Epitomics CA. , USA., part of Abcam, Cambridge, MA) for 24 minutes. Detection was performed with Ultraview-DAB from Ventana (Tucson, AZ) and subsequently counterstained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Pancreatic Tumor MUCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed in cut sections of pancreatic tumors using anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibody (MAb) clone 014E (MAb MUC1/014E, generated by one of us, Suguru Yonezawa) [24] ; anti-MUC2 MAb clone Ccp58 (MAb MUC2/Ccp58, Novocastra Reagents, Leica Biosystems, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK) and anti-MUC4 MAb clone 8G7 (MAb MUC4/8G7, generated by one of us, Surinder K. Batra) [25] (link), using the immunoperoxidase method. Antigen retrieval was performed using CC1 antigen retrieval buffer (pH 8.5, EDTA, 37°C, 30 min; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) for all sections. Following incubation with the primary antibodies (MAb MUC1/014E diluted 1∶5, 37°C, 32 min; MAb MUC2/Ccp58 diluted 1∶200, 37°C, 32 min; MAb MUC4/8G7 diluted 1∶3000, 37°C, 32 min) in phosphate buffered saline pH 7.4 (PBS) with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), sections were stained on a Benchmark XT automated slide stainer using a diaminobenzidine detection kit (UltraView DAB, Ventana Medical Systems). The control staining using normal mouse serum or PBS-BSA instead of the primary antibodies always showed no reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative HER2 Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the 4B5 anti-HER2 primary antibody and a polymer-based detection system (UltraView DAB) on a BenchMark automated staining system (all by Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, USA). Peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for chromogenic detecting by oxidizing 3,3′-Diaminobenzidin according to the manufactures protocol.
IHC HER2 stained slides were digitized using a Pannoramic P250 whole slide scanner (3D Histech, Budapest, Hungary) at 5.11 pixel/μm. DAB-precipitate thickness was measured with ‘ImageJ’ image-analysis software [18 (link)]. The regions of interest (ROIs) were manually defined according to the following rules: 10 non-adjacent tumor cells were measured per specimen. For each cell, ROIs perpendicular to the precipitate were drawn at 4 positions, i.e. 40 measurements per specimen, 4800 measurements in total. DAB-precipitate intensities were calculated using a color deconvolution algorithm [19 (link)]. The mean ROI-length and color intensity was calculated for each cell. The 8bit grey-scale intensity-values (0 = black, 256 = white) are as stated inverted, relative values to facilitate interpretation (0% = white, no staining; 100% black, full staining-intensity).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tumor material was processed by the pathology laboratory at the Erasmus MC according to routine procedures. A 4-μm section of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was mounted serially on adhesive glass slides. Deparaffinization was performed according to the Ventana BenchMark Ultra protocol. Antigen retrieval was performed by CC1 antigen retrieval solution (referent [ref.] 950-124, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Oro Valley, AZ). Specimens were incubated with the primary antibody, followed by detection with OptiView DAB (ref. 760-700, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), UltraView-DAB (ref. 760-500, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), or UltraView-AP (ref. 760-501, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.) with amplification (amplification kit ref: 760-080 or OptiView amplification kit ref: 760-099, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). Next, the specimens were counterstained with hematoxylin II (ref: 790-2208, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.) and coverslipped.
Each slide contained a positive control. All stains were performed on the Ventana BenchMark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). Primary antibodies, detection, and amplification methods used are mentioned in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of sLex in Human Lung

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human lung sections were immunolabeled for sLex as described,53 (link) with an antibody directed against CD15s (BD Pharmingen; CSLEX1) and ultraView DAB (Ventana Medical Systems).54 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gremlin-1 Immunohistochemistry in Aortic Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemical labelling, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded aortic tissue sections of LDS patients or healthy donors were pre-treated in citrate buffer and incubated with antibodies against Gremlin-1 (bs-1475R, Bioss, Woburn, MA) in an automated stainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) according to a standard protocol (CC1st). For double labelling with Gremlin-1 and muscle actin (ENZ-30931, Enzo Life Sciences GmbH, Loerrach, Germany) or Gremlin-1 and CD34 (M7165, Dako, Hamburg, Germany), incubation with Gremlin-1 antibodies was followed by a short denaturing step and incubation with the second antibody. Bound antibodies were detected by the peroxidase method using diaminobenzidine as chromogen (760–500, Ultraview DAB, Ventana). For double labelling studies, bound Gremlin-1 antibodies were visualized with DAB as described above and expression of muscle actin or CD34 was demonstrated by alkaline phosphastase linked secondary antibodies using fast red as chromogen (760–501, Ultraview Universal Detection Kit, Ventana).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of MUC1 and MUC4 in Pancreatic Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in cut sections of pancreatic tumors using anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibody (MAb) clone 014E (MAb MUC1/014E, the kind gift of Suguru Yonezawa) [38 (link)] and anti-MUC4 MAb clone 8G7 (MAb MUC4/8G7, the kind gift of Surinder K. Batra) [39 (link)] using the immunoperoxidase method. Antigen retrieval was performed using CC1 antigen retrieval buffer (pH 8.5, EDTA, 100°C, 30 minutes; Ventana Medical Systems, AZ, USA) for all sections. Following incubation with the primary antibodies (MAb MUC1/014E diluted 1:5, 37°C, 32 minutes; MAb MUC4/8G7 diluted 1:3000, 37°C, 32 minutes) in phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS) with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), sections were stained on a Benchmark XT automated slide stainer using a diaminobenzidine detection kit (UltraView DAB, Ventana Medical Systems). The control staining (normal mouse serum or PBS-BSA instead of the primary antibodies) showed no reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

IHC Analysis of MUC4 in Lung Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in cut sections of lung tumors using anti-MUC4 MAb clone 8G7 (MAb MUC4/8G7, the kind gift of Surinder K. Batra) [9 (link)] using the immunoperoxidase method. Antigen retrieval was performed using CC1 antigen retrieval buffer (pH 8.5, EDTA, 100°C, 30 minutes; Ventana Medical Systems, AZ, USA) for all sections. Following incubation in phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS) with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), sections were stained on a Benchmark XT automated slide stainer using a diaminobenzidine detection kit (UltraView DAB, Ventana Medical Systems). The control staining (normal mouse serum or PBS-BSA instead of the primary antibodies) showed no reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were immunostained according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and in brief processed as follows: the slides were dried at 60°C for 1 hour and placed in the BenchMark Ultra instrument (Ventana), deparaffinized on-board and submitted to heat-induced epitope retrieval in cell conditioning 1 for 32 minutes at 95°C. Following endogenous peroxidase blocking, the primary antibody (rabbit monoclonal clone 4B5, 760-2991) was applied for 20 minutes at 36°C. After a wash in buffer the visualization complex, UltraView DAB (horseradish peroxidase -labeled multimer, Ventana, 760-500) was applied, and after a new wash in the buffer, the slides were finally developed with DAB (Ventana, 760-500) and counterstained with hematoxylin II (Ventana, 790-2208).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!