The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 22.0 windows software

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 22.0 Windows software is a statistical analysis tool developed by IBM. It provides a comprehensive set of features for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is designed to work on the Windows operating system and offers a user-friendly interface for researchers, analysts, and professionals to conduct various statistical analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using spss 22.0 windows software

1

Factors Influencing In-Hospital Mortality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to confirm the normality of variables. Normal distribution variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation whereas non-normal distribution variables were expressed as median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (percentage). We performed Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test to compare the difference of normal distribution variables and non-normal distribution variables, respectively. And χ2 test was used to compare the difference of categorical variables.
We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to find risk factors of in-hospital mortality. Spearman rank correlation test was utilized to analyze the relationship between two variables. The predictive value of factors and models was evaluated by drawing receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Z test was performed to compare the predictive value of different factors and models.
A P value < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. SPSS 22.0 Windows software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Predictive Factors for Acute Kidney Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normally distributed data was presented as mean ± standard deviation while nonnormally distributed data was presented as median (interquartile range). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to confirm the normality of the included variables. Categorical data was presented as numbers (percentage). We used independent Student's t-test to compare the difference between two groups of normally distributed variables. And the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference between two groups of nonnormally distributed variables. The difference of categorical variables was analyzed by using the χ2 test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to analyze the association between various factors and the occurrence of AKI. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each risk factor were also calculated. We performed Spearman's method to analyze the correlation of serum uric acid level and other laboratory variables. To testify the value of different models for predicting AKI, we have drawn the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Finally, the Z test was utilized to test the difference of AUC.
A p value < 0.05 was considered to be of statistical significance. SPSS 22.0 Windows software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Prognostic Model for TBI Mortality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were performed to confirm the normality of included variables. Non-normally distributed variables and normally distributed variables were shown in the form of median (interquartile range) and mean±standard deviation, respectively. And categorical variables were presented as numbers (percentage). We compared the difference of non-normally distributed variables and normally distributed variables between two subgroups by using Mann–Whitney U-test and Student’s t-test, respectively. Difference of categorical variables were analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher test. Univariate logistic regression analysis was firstly utilized to explore the potential factors for mortality of included TBI patients. Then, potential significant factors in univariate regression were selected by conducting stepwise forward multivariate logistic regression. Significant risk factors in multivariate analysis were finally utilized to construct a prognostic model using logistic regression. We draw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of single factors and the constructed prognostic model. Z-tests were conducted to compare the area under the ROC curve (AUC) difference of these factors and the model.
We considered that a two-sided p-value<0.05 was of statistical significance. SPSS 22.0 Windows software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses and figures drawing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Serum Magnesium and Mortality in TBI Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The normality of recorded variables was confirmed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Normally distributed and non-normally distributed variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation and median (interquartile range), respectively. Categorical variables were shown as number (percentage). Differences between two groups of normally distributed and non-normally distributed variables were verified by Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was performed to compare the difference between two groups of categorical variables. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) was performed to discover potential nonlinear relationship between serum magnesium level and the risk of mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to discover risk factors for mortality and analyze the association between serum magnesium level and mortality in TBI patients. Kaplan–Meier curve was drawn to compare survival between groups of different serum magnesium levels. Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore relationship between two variables.
Two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS 22.0 Windows software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R software (version 3.6.1; R Foundation) were used for all statistical analyses and figure drawing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!