The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using 2100 microscope

1

Characterization of Microgel Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1H NMR spectra of the microgel was studied using a VARIAN 400 spectrometer (400 MHz). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a JEOL (Tokyo, Japan) 2100 microscope operated at 200 kV. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) studies were performed on a JSM 7600 F microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 5 kV. UV-Vis spectra of the samples were recorded using a Shimadzu (Tokyo, Japan) 2550 spectrophotometer. Finally, the size of the composite particles dispersed in water (20 mg/mL) was determined by Malvern Nano ZS dynamic light scattering (DLS) varying from 20 to 50 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing MCA Morphology via SEM and TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize MCA morphology at different steps through the fabrication procedure (payload, sealing) and after opening microchamber(s), SEM was used to ensure appropriate samples (FEI Quanta ESEM, electron microscope, FEI, Hillsboro, USA). SEM was carried out using an accelerating voltage of 10 kV, a spot size of 3.5, and a working distance of ~10 mm.
TEM images of the MCA with GNRs were obtained using a Jeol 2100 microscope (Tokyo, Japan). GNRs diameters and lengths were evaluated from digitized TEM images (Grapher 8, Golden Software, Inc.) of about 500 GNRs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Spherical Selenium Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of SeNPs was analyzed by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (Supra 35 VP, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (2100 microscope, Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). For FE-SEM analysis, the lyophilized sample was coated with carbon, while for TEM analysis a drop of colloidal solution of SeNPs was placed onto a lacey carbon film supported by a 300-mesh-copper grid and dried at ambient conditions. Figure S3D (Supplementary Materials) shows an FE-SEM image of SeNPs and Figure S3E (Supplementary Materials) shows a TEM image of these nanoparticles. As can be seen from these images, SeNPs possess spherical morphology with a diameter of particles of about 50 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Polystyrene Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images were recorded using Hitachi S-4800 microscope and JEOLJEM-2100 microscope, respectively. The particle size distribution of the PS particles dispersed in water was determined by dynamic light scattering technique (DLS, Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Panalytical Company). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was conducted on Bruker Multimode 8. FT-IR spectra of the as-prepared PS particles were recorded by Nicolet Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (NEXUS 670) using the KBr technique. The images of water contact angles were obtained using JC2000D1 contact angle analyzer (Powereach, China) with ultrapure water droplet size of 8 μL at room temperature. All the contact angle values were determined as averages of measurements from at least five different points on each sample surface, using the Laplace–Young fitting mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X–ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Shimadzu XRD–7000S instrument in reflection mode with Cu Kα radiation. The accelerating voltage was set at 40 kV with 30 mA current (λ = 1.542 A°). Diffraction patterns were obtained over the range of 2‒70o with a scanning rate of 5° min–1. Field emission (FE)–scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were performed on a Hitachi SU–8010 scanning microscope with an accelerating voltage of 5.0 kV. Powder samples were spread on carbon tape adhered to the SEM stage. Before observation, the samples were sputter coated with a thin platinum layer to prevent charging and to improve the image quality. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) analyses were performed on a JEOL 2100 microscope with an accelerating voltage of 400 kV. Samples were dispersed in ethanol with sonication and then casted onto copper TEM grids. Measurements of ζ‒potential were recorded with a Malvern Zetasizer Nano–Z system, after the particles were dispersed in water via ultrasonication for 30 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterizing Fe3O4-TiO2 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) of NPs was obtained with a 2100 microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 200 kV. X-ray diffraction patterns were collected on a D8 Advance (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) powder diffractometer using CuKα radiation (40 kV, 40 mA) with a step size of 0.02° in 2θ and 3 seconds/step. Loaded Fe and Ti content in Fe3O4-TiO2 NPs was measured by ICP optical emission spectroscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD patterns were collected through an XRD‐7000S diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα1 Radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). Scanning electron microscopy observations were performed on a JEM7600F microscope at 15 kV. TEM observations were carried out on a JEOL2100 microscope at 200 kV. Raman spectra were recorded on a Renishaw Invia spectrometer by using Ar+ laser of 514.5 nm. The nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms were recorded at 77 K by using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer and the surface area was calculated using the BET method. XPS spectra were recorded on an Axis Ultra DLD system with a monochromatic Al Kα X‐ray source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis and Characterization of Silica-Coated SPIONs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Silica-coated SPIONs were synthesized by coprecipitation from aqueous solutions of iron salts, as described in detail elsewhere [81 (link),82 (link),83 (link)]. Then, the surface of the NPs was functionalized by addition of citric acid and coated with a ~4 nm thick silica shell as described in our published studies [84 (link),85 (link),86 (link),87 (link)]. The silica-coated SPIONs were characterized by TEM, DLS, and zeta potential measurements. Samples for TEM analysis were prepared by drying the aqueous suspension of silica-coated SPIONs at room temperature on a transparent carbon film on a copper grid, and images were acquired using a JEOL 2100 microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Suspension of silica-coated SPIONs in serum-free medium (c = 1 mg/mL; pH = 7.91) was monitored by electrokinetic measurements of zeta potential (Anton Paar GmbH, Litesizer 500, Graz, Austria) and hydrodynamic diameter distribution was determined by DLS (Anton Paar GmbH, Litesizer 500, Graz, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Printed Nanocrystal-Based Porous Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dimension and microstructure of the printed inorganic nanocrystal-based porous materials were imaged using OM and SEM, respectively. Optical imaging was performed using an OM (BX51M, Olympus). SEM (including tilted views) and EDS mapping image were collected using a field-effect SEM (Nova NanoSEM, FEI and SU7000, Hitachi High-Tech) with a 10 kV (SEM image) and 20 kV (EDS mapping image) electron beam. The CCD images and movies were obtained using a CCD camera (MicroPublisher 5.0 RTV, QImaging). The TEM images were obtained at 200 kV using a JEOL-2100 microscope (JEOL). HR-TEM, HAADF-STEM imaging, and spectral imaging based on STEM-EDS were performed at 200 kV using a JEM-2100F (JEOL) and JEM-ARM300F microscope (JEOL). For analysis, the printed objects were crushed and suspended in methanol by ultrasound for 15–120 s, depending on their dispersing ability. The cross-sectional TEM sample of Ag filament was prepared using a focused ion beam (FEI Helios NanoLab 450). Bright-field transmission electron microscopy (BF-TEM) and scanning TEM images were obtained using a chromatic aberration (Cs) corrected TEM (Grand ARM300F, JEOL) at an acceleration voltage of 160 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Chiral Organocatalyst Gel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H- and 13C-NMR spectra measurements were recorded in a Varian Mercury 300 MHz spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 30 °C. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed at room temperature with a Bruker D4 Endeavor X-ray powder diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Madison, WI, USA) by using Cu-K radiation. A sample of the dried gel was placed on a sample holder and data were collected for 2θ values between 2 and 40° with a step size of 0.03° and a time step of 10 s. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded in a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Peabody, MA, USA). The measurements were performed on pellets composed by 1 mg of lyophilized gel and 50 mg of KBr. For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), a small portion of the gel was placed on a nickel grid coated with carbon and allowed to dry on air. Images were recorded in a JEOL 2100 microscope (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA). Catalytic enantiomeric excess was determined by HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a Chiralpack IA column, λ = 254 nm, Ethanol/Hexane (v/v: 15/85), flow rate = 1.5 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!