The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

112 protocols using m0851

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of OSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemical staining, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human OSCC tissue sections were used. The primary antibodies used were as follows: anti-NOTCH3, rabbit polyclonal, 1:200 (ab23426, Abcam, CA, USA); anti-SMA, mouse monoclonal, 1:100 (M0851, Dako, Glostrup, Sweden). Antigen retrieval was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. EnVision+ Dual Link (Dako) was used for secondary antibody, and coloration was conducted with diamino-benzidine substrate. For immunofluorescent double-staining, anti-NOTCH3, 1:200 (Abcam), SMA, 1:100 (mouse monoclonal, M0851, Dako or rabbit monoclonal, Clone SP171, Spring Bioscinece, CA, USA), CD34, 1:100 (mouse monoclonal, NCL-L-END, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and Cytokeratin, 1:100 (mouse monoclonal, Clone AE1/AE3, M3515, Dako) were used as a primary antibody. For antigen retrieval, the sections were treated with Tris buffer (pH = 7.4) containing 0.1 mg/ml trypsin for 30 min at 37°C for CD34 antibody. Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (A11008, Invitrogen, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse IgG (A11005, Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibody. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. The immunofluoroscent images were captured and analyzed using Axioskop2 plus microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Arterial Plaque Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carotid cross sections were stained for SR (Direct Red 80, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany; 365548), ki67 (with the antibody M7248 from Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 1:10 diluted) and SMA (M0851; Dako; 1:100 diluted). These sections were scanned. Subsequent analysis was conducted with QuPath software (version 0.2.3, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK) [61 (link)]: once more, the areas of media and neointima were first designated manually before the subsequent parameters were automatically quantified for these two areas. The positive cell detection command in QuPath was used for cell detection, counting and classification. In the ki67-stained sections, the overall cell number, as well as the cell density per mm² and the number of ki67+ cells per cross-section were determined. The threshold for positive cell detection was set using the pixel intensity histogram in order to ensure a standardized classification while still taking staining variation between slides into account. The formula used was:
The relative proportion of SMA+ and SR+ areas was measured. For quantification of SMA-positive cells, it is common to analyze the stained areas [62 (link),63 (link)], as a reliable assignment to individual cells is not possible.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Atherosclerosis Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hearts were collected and fixed in phosphate-buffered 4% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and cross-sectioned (5 μm) throughout the aortic root area, starting from the appearance of open aortic valve leaflets. Per mouse, six sections with 50 μm intervals were used for atherosclerosis quantification. Sections were stained with hematoxylin–phloxine–saffron for histological analysis. The macrophage area was determined using rat anti-mouse antibody MAC3 (1:1000; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA). The smooth muscle cell area was quantified using monoclonal mouse antibody M0851 (1:800; Dako, Heverlee, The Netherlands) against smooth muscle cell actin. The collagen area was determined using Sirius Red staining. The lesion area and composition were quantified using ImageJ Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody Characterization for Stem Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies used were as follows: mouse anti-SSEA-4 (1:100, MAB4304, Millipore), goat anti-Nanog (1:20, AF1997, R&D Systems), rabbit anti-Oct4 (1:200, ab19857, Abcam), mouse anti-α-SMA (1:200, M0851, Dako), goat anti-Sox17 (1:200, AF1924, R&D Systems), rabbit anti-Tuj1 (1:2000, MRB-435P, Covance), mouse anti-Flag M2 (ICC, 1:500; WB, 1:100, F1804, Sigma), mouse anti-HA Tag (6E2) (ICC, 1:100; WB, 1:1000, #2367, Cell Signaling), rabbit anti-Tom20 (1:100, sc-11415, Santa Cruz), and mouse anti-GAPDH (1:1000, NB600-502, Novusbio). Alexa Fluor 488 (A11055 or A11034, Molecular Probes), Alexa Fluor 594 (A11005, Molecular Probes) and Alexa Fluor 647 (ab150075, Abcam)-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for immunofluorescent study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spectrin Dynamics in TGFβ-Induced Fibrosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents were as follows: human plasma fibronectin (20 μg/mL, F1056; Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), human recombinant TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL, 100-21C; Peprotech, London, UK), αII-spectrin siRNA (25 ng/cm2, EHU093741; Sigma-Aldrich), βII-spectrin siRNA (25 ng/cm2, EHU081451; Sigma-Aldrich), Renilla luciferase siRNA (25 ng/cm2, EHURLUC; Sigma-Aldrich), Alexa647-labeled streptavidin (8 μg/mL, S32357; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Landsmeer, The Netherlands), TRITC labeled-Phalloidin (100 nM, P1951; Sigma-Aldrich). Antibodies used: mouse anti-αII-spectrin (2 μg/mL, sc-376849; Santa Cruz, Dallas, USA), mouse anti-βII-spectrin (2 μg/mL, sc-376487; Santa Cruz), mouse anti-αSMA (0.28 μg/mL, M0851; DAKO; Glostrup, Denmark), mouse anti-collagen type I (1 μg/mL, ab90395; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse anti-vinculin (9.3 μg/mL, V9131; Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following tumor resections, 2 mm thick sections perpendicular to the injection columns, were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 hours, scanned and processed as previously described [5 (link)]. Rabbit anti-CC3 antibody (Cell Signaling, 1:150 dilution), mouse anti pHH3 (Cell Signaling, 1:200 dilution), mouse anti-GLUT1 (Abcam ab40084, 1:250 dilution), rabbit anti-CD31 (Abcam ab28364, 1:250 dilution), rabbit anti-SMA (Dako M0851, 1:1000 dilution), rabbit anti-S100A9 (Abcam 63818, 1:5000 dilution) were used for IHC analysis. For immunofluorescent detection, secondary antibodies conjugated to AlexaFluor647 (Jackson Immunoresearch, 1:600 dilution) and AlexaFluor555 (Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) was applied according to manufacturer’s instructions and tissues counterstained with DAPI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Extracellular Matrix Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (Warnock et al., 2012 (link)) for type I collagen (AB749P; 1:100 dilution; Millipore), type II collagen (AB746P; 1:100: Millipore), macrophage MAC387 receptor to determine type A synoviocyte content, (CBL260; 1:200 dilution; Millipore); and alpha smooth muscle actin (M0851; 1:30; Dako). Extracellular and intracellular immunoreactivity intensity and prevalence was scored as previously described (Wakshlag et al., 2011 (link)) with some modifications: immunoreactivity was localized to intracellular or extracellular staining, and ECM immunoreactivity intensity was described and scored, as negative (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or strong (3) staining. As determined by hand count, intracellular immunoreactivity and extracellular immunoreactivity was categorized as positive in <10%, 10–50%, or >50% of cells and sample area, respectively. Each of these histologic observations was assigned a score (Table 2). Then a histologic intensity coefficient was calculated for each ECM component, as follows: [[(Extracellular matrix staining intensity score) × (percentage area coverage of positive staining score)] + [(Intracellular staining intensity score) × (percentage positive staining cells score)]]/2 (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of EC and SMC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Passage 1 EC and SMC were grown to confluence on plastic dishes or on chitosan/PCL membranes. After that, they were fixed with 4% PFA (paraformaldehyde) for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and blocked with 1% BSA (bovine serum albumin). The cells were stained with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, washed with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The stained cells were analysed with an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Ti-E) using Nikon AR software.
The following primary antibodies were used: anti-human CD31 (M0823, DAKO, 1:50), anti-α-SMA (DAKO, M0851, 1:50), anti-smooth muscle myosin heavy chain 11 (Abcam, ab82541, 1:500), anti-human CD90 (eBioscience, 14090982, 1:100), anti-Von Willebrand factor (Abcam, ab6994, 1:200), anti-fibronectin (Abcam, ab6328, 1:200), anti-elastin (Abcam, ab21610, 1:200), and anti-collagen IV (Life Span, 1:200).
The following secondary antibodies were used: Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Life Technologies, A21124, 1:400), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Life Technologies, A21121, 1:400), Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Life Technologies, A21134, 1:400), Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Life Technologies, A11031, 1:400), and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Life Technologies, A11029, 1:400).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Histopathological Analysis of Tumours

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted tumours were fixed in 10% buffered formalin (Sigma) for 24-48 h at room temperature and then stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C. Samples were then paraffin-embedded, sectioned at 4 μm thickness and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Ki67 (NB110-90592, Novus), TUNEL (homemade by the Pathology Research Program Laboratory), ER (ab80922, Abcam), PR (NCL-PR-312, Leica), HER2 (RM9103, Thermo Fisher Scientific), CK5 (NCL-LCK5, Leica), EGFR (28-0005, Invitrogen), p63 (VP-P960, Vector) and SMA (M0851, Dako) were used to further analyse tumour sections. All immunohistochemistry was performed as a service by the Pathology Research Program Laboratory (University Health Network, Toronto, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Lung and Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung sections were stained with Alcian blue Elastin Van Gieson and immunostained for αSMA (α-smooth muscle actin; 1:150; Dako, M0851), von Willebrand factor (1:300; Dako, A0082), NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-B; 1:400; Cell Signaling, D14E12), F4/80 (1:100; Abcam, ab111101), iNOS (inducible NO synthase; 1:100; Abcam, ab15323), and CD206 (1:100; R&D Systems, AF2535). As isotype control, IgG and IgG2a were used. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded liver sections were stained with anti-F4/80 to confirm macrophage ablation. For immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent staining, a standard protocol was followed. Histological images were visualized using a Zeiss multislide scanning microscope (Imager.Z2; Carl Zeiss, Ltd) with an Axiocam 506 color camera (Zeiss) for immunohistochemical images and MRm camera (Zeiss) for immunofluorescent images. Slides were scanned sequentially using ×20 magnification objective lens, and the analysis was performed in Zen2 blue edition (Zeiss). For all tissue macrophage quantification, positively stained cells were counted in 6 fields of view at ×200 magnification and normalized to the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!