The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Abi 3730 sequencer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Japan

The ABI 3730 sequencer is a capillary electrophoresis DNA sequencing system designed for automated, high-throughput DNA sequencing. It utilizes fluorescent dye-labeled terminator chemistry and multi-capillary array electrophoresis technology to perform DNA sequence analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

180 protocols using abi 3730 sequencer

1

Genetic Variants Analysis in High-Altitude Adaptation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of selected EPAS1 (Genbank reference sequence: NC_000002.12) SNPs was done by partial sequencing method covering the respective genomic region of these SNPs. Primers were designed using Primer3 software and genotyping was performed using Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The LD map of EPAS1 was constructed using Haploview version 4.1(Barrett et al. 2005). Similarly, genotyping of two missense mutations (rs12097901G and rs186996510C) of EGLN1 (Genbank reference sequence: NC_000001.11) was done using SNaPshot method on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The SNaPshot method was applied as described previously (Xiang et al. 2013). The 5.5 kb resequencing of EGLN1 in 50 Sherpa samples was also done using Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). In addition, genotyping of TED was done following the method described in the previous study (Lou et al. 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping of SNP and Indel Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the replication study, we used 1,433 samples from the remainder of the cohort from the same farm selected for the GWAS (Additional file 7). The g.48476925C > T SNP was genotyped by directly sequencing PCR products using a forward primer (5′-acaatctcctcgcgctcac-3′) and a reverse primer (5′-caagttctggtccaggctct-3′). PCR products were sequenced using the reverse primer and the BigDye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems), followed by electrophoresis using an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems) and genotyping using SeqScape software, V2.5 (Applied Biosystems). The 3-bp indel (g.48476943_48476946insGGC) was PCR-amplified using a forward primer (5′-acaatctcctcgcgctcac-3′) and a reverse primer (5′-fluorescein amidite-caagttctggtccaggctct-3′). PCR products were electrophoresed using an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems) and genotyped using GeneScan analysis software (Applied Biosystems) and GeneMapper software v3.7 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Screening for LQTS and BrS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequence-specific oligonucleotide primers amplified all LQTS and BrS risk-genes (KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1, KCNE2) targets before direct sequencing (ABI3730 sequencer, Life Technologies, California). For the CPVT risk-gene RYR2, we individually screened 37 prioritized exons (7–9, 13–16, 43–50, 82–84, 87–105) with single strand conformational analysis (SSCA); amplicons demonstrating abnormal conformation were subsequently sequenced selectively with an ABI3730 sequencer (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sequencing of pfmdr1 Polymorphisms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymorphisms in the pfmdr1 gene were determined by direct sequencing of the amplicons resulting from the nested PCR using each primer for target gene amplification. The sequencing was done using BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit in an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The deduced amino acid sequences were aligned and analyzed with the Lasergene® software (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA) using the reference sequences of 3D7 retrieved from Plasmodium database (http://www.plasmodb.org).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genotyping of Botrytis cinerea strains from agricultural and non-agricultural habitats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A subset of 109 strains collected from non-agricultural habitats were genotyped (Table 1). They were compared to 327 agricultural strains sampled from lettuce and tomato plants grown in several greenhouses in the South of France (Leyronas et al., 2015a ,b (link),c (link)).
Genomic DNA was extracted from aliquots of 15 mg lyophilized fungal material (harvested from two-week old cultures on Potato Dextrose Agar), following the DNeasy Plant extraction Kit protocole (Qiagen). The nine microsatellite markers designed for B. cinerea by Fournier et al. (2002) (link) were amplified following the protocol described by Leyronas et al. (2015b) (link). To determine the size of the microsatellites, the PCR products were scanned with the help of an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). GeneMapper software version 4.1 (Applied Biosystems) was then used for the microsatellite size analysis. Complete microsatellite size profiles (referred to as “haplotypes” hereafter) were obtained for 109 environmental strains and 327 agricultural strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Screening for Common ESBL and Carbapenemase Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Screening for common ESBLs or carbapenemase genes, including blaTEM (Yu et al., 2007 (link)), blaSHV (Yu et al., 2007 (link)), blaCTX-M (Yu et al., 2007 (link)), AmpC (Perez-Perez and Hanson, 2002 (link)), blaKPC (Yigit et al., 2001 (link)), blaIMP (Queenan and Bush, 2007 (link)), blaV IM (Queenan and Bush, 2007 (link)), and blaNDM (Zhang et al., 2013 (link)) were performed by PCR amplification using specific primers in a Tpersonal Cycler (Biometra, Germany). The PCR products were then sequenced using an ABI3730 Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and compared with the reported sequences from GenBank.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Investigating CFEM-containing Proteins in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate whether CFEM-containing proteins exist in plant7 (link) or not, we cultured tissues for Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor. Seeds were surface-sterilized by immersion in 75% alcohol for 1 min and in 0.01% mercuric chloride for 5 min, and then kept in 4 °C for 48 h. These seeds were dissected by peeling off the seed coat and endosperm. Acquired cotyledons were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MSO) medium at 25 °C in an incubator for about two weeks under darkness until calluses were generated. All operations were carried out under sterile conditions in a laminar flow hood. Non-sterilized seeds were used as controls and cultured in the same conditions.
We used RT-PCR to amplify CFEM from total RNA and genomic DNA isolated from the cultured tissues of Z. mays and S. bicolor. For the first-strand cDNA synthesis, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed in a volume of 20 μl and stored at −80 °C for further use. Two pairs of primers (5′-GCTATTCCTTGCCTTGACGA CGCC-3′, 5′-CCGAGACCCTTGAGGCCAGCAGC-3′ for Z. mays; 5′-GGACGCTGGCGGAGCCTGTG-3′, 5′-TTGCCGCTCAGGACTTTGGTGG-3′ for S. bicolor) were designed from CFEM sequences identified from ESTs of the two plants. All products were isolated from a 1.5% agarose gel and cloned using the T-vector. Positive clones were cycle sequenced in both directions using Big Dye Terminator (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on an ABI3730 sequencer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sanger Sequencing of Likely Gene-Disrupting Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed Sanger sequencing for all the identified LGDstrict (likely gene-disrupting) mutations (including stop-gain, frameshift, and canonical splice-site variants) among the probands. DNA from parents and other family members was also examined to ascertain the inheritance pattern and segregation of the variant where applicable. Sanger sequencing was performed on genomic DNA from peripheral blood. Primers for Sanger sequencing (sequences on request) were designed with Primer 3 software and sequenced on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies). The data were analyzed with Sequencher 5.4.1 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Plasmid Cloning and Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR products (1–4 uL) were cloned into a pCR®-4TOPO vector using a TOPO TA Cloning® kit (Invitrogen) or pSTC1.3 vector (10 ul of PCR product) using a StabyCloning kit (Eurogentec, San Diego, CA). Plasmids from bacterial colonies cultured overnight in LB medium (100 ug/ml ampicillin) were purified using a QIAprep® Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen). Plasmid inserts were sequenced using SequiTherm Excell (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI), as described [6] (link), or by the Colorado Cancer Center Core Sequencing Facility using an ABI3730 Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequences are accessible in the GenBank database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plant DNA Barcoding and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were tested using CBOL Plant Working Group9 (link) recommended DNA regions rbcL, and matK as well as new primers designed in this study. The selected loci were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on a PTC–100 thermocycler (Bio-Rad). DNA was amplified in 20 μL reaction mixtures containing 1 U AmpliTaq Gold Polymerase with GeneAmp 106 PCR buffer II (100 mm Tris–HCl pH 8.3, 500 mm KCl) and 2.5 mm MgCl2 (Applied Biosystems), 0.2 mm dNTPs, 0.1 mm of each primer (0.5 mm for matK), and 20 ng template DNA. Amplified products were sequenced for new markers in both directions with the primers used for amplification, following the protocols of the University of Guelph Genomics facility (www.uoguelph.ca/~genomics). Products from each specimen were cleaned using Sephadex columns and run on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Bidirectional sequence reads were obtained for all the PCR products. Sequences were assembled using Sequencher 4.5 (Gene Codes Corp), and aligned manually using Bioedit version 7.0.9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!