The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using grade 5

1

Adoptive Transfer of Antigen-Pulsed DCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CoPP or DMSO-treated BM-DCs from BALB/c mice were pulsed with OVA (200 μg/ml; grade V; Sigma-Aldrich) and LPS (1 μg/ml) for 24 hours. The harvested BM-DCs were then transferred intratracheally (1 × 106 cells) or intravenously (2 × 105 cells/recipient) into syngeneic naive mice. After 10 days, the recipients were daily challenged with 3% OVA aerosol for 15 minutes for consecutive 4 days. On the day after last challenge, bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALFs) and local draining lymph node cells were collected and the cells were stained with PE-Cy7-anti-CD11c (N418; eBioscience), FITC-anti-I-Ad/I-Ed (M5/114.15.2; eBioscience), PE-anti-CCR3 (83101; R&D Systems), APC-anti-CD3 (145-2C11; BD Biosciences) and anti-B220 (RA3-6B2; eBioscience) Abs. The cellular composition of BALF or lymph node cells was determined by flow cytometry (LSR II; BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

OVA-Induced Allergic Airway Sensitization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals from OVA and O + CS groups were sensitized with two intraperitoneal injections containing 20 µg/mL of OVA (Grade V, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) adsorbed in 3 mg/mL of aluminum hydroxide (Pepsamar gel, Sanofi-Synthelabo S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (21 (link)). Animals received the intraperitoneal injections of OVA in a total volume of 0.2 mL on days 0 and 14. Animals from SAL and CS groups received two intraperitoneal injection containing saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) and aluminum hydroxide on same days. On days 21, 23, 25, and 27, the animals were challenged via aerosol for 30 min. OVA sensitized groups were challenged with OVA solution at 1% and non-sensitized groups were challenged with saline solution. On day 28, the animals were studied (Figure 1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ovalbumin-Induced Allergic Rhinitis Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After acclimatization to laboratory conditions, the first phase of the study involved the immunization of the rats. Fourteen rats were sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA; 0.3 mg intraperitoneally; Grade V, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as antigen, which was administered together with aluminum hydroxide (30 mg) in saline (1 mL intraperitoneally) every 2 days for 14 days, between 11 and 12 AM. In the second phase, all 14 sensitized animals were used to develop a model of AR by repeated intranasal instillation of 10 µL of 20 mg/mL OVA with a micropipette daily for 15 days between 11 and 12 AM [6 (link)]. The animals were separated into two groups. Group A included 7 sensitized rats (AR group). The 7 rats in group B additionally received 10 µL of 20 mg/mL Dox (D-9891; Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 0.9% physiological saline, which was instilled into both nostrils using a pipette one hour before the administration of OVA for 15 days (Dox group). Additionally, a control group (group C) was established; 7 rats were repeatedly sensitized and challenged with saline with the same dose and on a similar time schedule as the other animals in the other groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Murine Asthma Model and MSC Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BALB/c mice (n=6–8 per group) were immunized on days 0 and 7 by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of OVA/alum (10 μg OVA emulsified in 1 mg aluminium hydroxide; grade V; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and were exposed to OVA aerosol challenges (grade III) on days 17–19; aerosol challenges were generated from a jet nebulizer delivering 1% OVA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min. To examine the effect of MSC transplantation, 24 h prior to the first OVA aerosol challenge, a number of the mice received an intravenous injection of 106 MSCs. The positive control mice received PBS instead of MSCs. The negative control mice were neither sensitized with OVA nor given MSC treatment prior to OVA aerosol challenges. Twenty-four hours after the last OVA exposure, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected with 1-ml washes of Ca2+- and Mg2+-free Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS; Invitrogen Life Technologies) supplemented with 0.1 mM EDTA, and slides were prepared with Cytospin III (Shandon Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and stained with May-Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich) for determination of cell counts. Immediately after the collection of BALF, lungs were resected and stored in optimum cutting temperature freezing medium. In certain experiments, MLNs and lungs were digested with collage-nase/DNAse (Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described (25 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Murine Allergic Asthma Model with Dexamethasone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol of experimental model establishing was adopted as previously described [12 (link)]. Mice were sensitized IP with 20 μg chicken OVA (Grade V, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) emulsified in 2.0 mg of alum (Shanghai No.4 Reagent & H.V. Chemical Industries Ltd., Shanghai, China) in a total volume of 100 μl of 0.9% sterile saline on days 1 and 14. Non-sensitized mice just received 2.0 mg of alum in 0.9% saline. On day 24, 25, and 26, mice received three aerosol challenges with 5% OVA (wt/vol) (Grade II, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) in 0.9% endotoxin-free saline (non-sensitized mice received saline only) for 30 min daily. Using a plastic box (50 × 30 × 40 cm3) as exposure chamber, where the air was kept at 20 – 22°C and relative humidity 50 – 60%, the aerosol was generated by a sidestream jet nebulizer (PARI BOY, Starnberg, Germany) into the chamber and mice were put into stainless cages inside the chamber with irradiated food and acidified water provided ad libitum. One hour before each challenge, mice received dexamethasone (2 mg/kg) IP in 0.1 ml endotoxin-free PBS or PBS alone. The dosage of dexamethasone has been adopted by multiple publications [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Allergic Pulmonary Inflammation Induction and CrataBL Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The model of choice for allergic pulmonary inflammation induction was previously reported [21 (link), 22 (link)] and is detailed in Figure 1. Animals were immunized intraperitonially on days 0 and 14 using 50 μg of OVA (Grade IV, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) with 6 mg of Al (OH)3 adjuvant (Pepsamar, Sandei-Synthelabo SA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) diluted in 0.2 mL saline. Eight days after the second immunization, the mice were placed in a Plexiglas box (30 x 15 x 20 cm) coupled to an ultrasonic nebulizer (US-1000, ICEL, São Paulo, Brazil), and an aerosol of OVA solution (1%) (Grade V, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) diluted in 0.9% sterile NaCl solution (saline) was generated for 30 minutes 4 times every other day. Control mice received the adjuvant intraperitoneally and were exposed to nebulized aerosol comprised of saline (0.9% NaCl).
Treated mice received intraperitoneal injections containing 2 mg/kg of CrataBL administered in 0.2 mL for each dose over seven consecutive days, two hours after inhalations exposures (days 22 to 28) (Figure 1). The administered dose was the same as that used in an experimental model of thrombosis [23 (link)], similar to the elastase inhibitor BbCI (Bauhinia bauhinioides Cruzipain Inhibitor) which is also a proteinase inhibitor used in asthma model [24 (link), 25 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Rat Model of Allergic Asthma and Cigarette Smoke

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A rat model of allergic asthma was used as previously described [32 (link)]. Briefly, male Brown Norway rats were sensitised on day 0, 14 and 21 with chicken ovalbumin (OVA) (100 μg/rat, i.p., Grade V, Sigma, UK.) administered with Alum (20 mg/rat aluminium hydroxide and 20 mg/rat magnesium hydroxide, i.p., Alum™ Thermo Scientific, UK). Rats were exposed to room air or CS for 1 h, twice a day (4 h apart) on day 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27. On day 28 the rats were exposed to air/smoke in the morning and in the afternoon the rats were challenged with vehicle (saline, aerosolised for 30 min) or OVA (1% w/v, aerosolised for 30 min). The LAR was monitored in conscious BN rats for 1 to 6 h after challenge as previously described [31 , 35 ]. The following day the animals were euthanised with pentobarbitone (200 mg/kg, i.p., Centaur Services, UK). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was carried out by injecting 3 ml of RPMI culture medium (Invitrogen, UK) via a cannula inserted into the trachea, waiting 30 s and then removing it. This was repeated and the collected BAL fluid (BALF) pooled. Total and type of white cells in the BALF were determined as previously described [32 (link), 35 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Murine Allergic Asthma Model via OVA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty mice were randomly divided into the control group (NC), the control + acupoint catgut-embedding group (NA), the asthma group (AST), the asthma + acupoint catgut-embedding group (ASA), and the asthma + sham-acupoint catgut-embedding group (ASS), n = 8 in each group. To establish a model of allergic asthma, mice were sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA) by intraperitoneal injection and atomization inhalation as mentioned previously [20 (link)]. In brief, on day 0 and day 7 of model building (sensitization stage), mice in groups AST, ASS, and ASA were given a mixture of OVA (20 μg, Grade V; Sigma-Aldrich) and aluminum hydroxide (2 mg, Thermo Scientific) by intraperitoneally injection. From day 14 to 16 (challenge stage), mice were given an inhalation of 3% OVA solution (w/v) for 30 min through an ultrasonic nebulizer (402AI, Yuyue Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China). Then, from day 21 to 48, mice were challenged daily. Additionally, mice in the NC and NA groups were sensitized and challenged with saline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ovalbumin-Induced Allergic Airway Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WT BALB/c mice or CD1d-/- mice were intraperitoneally sensitized on day 0 and 14 with 20 μg of chicken ovalbumin (OVA; grade V, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) emulsified in 2 mg of aluminum hydroxide (Thermo Scientific Pierce, Rockford, Rockford, IL, USA) in 200 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Intranasal OVA challenges (100 μg/50 μL in PBS) were administered on days 25, 26, and 27. Age- and sex-matched control mice were similarly treated with PBS alone. The mice were sacrificed 24 h after the final challenge and their sera, BALF, lungs, and spleen were harvested and analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Oral Exposure to Heated Milk and Ovalbumin Sensitization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A schematic representation of the experimental timeline is depicted in Fig. 1B. Mice were orally exposed, by using a blunt needle, to 0.5 mL raw milk, the milk samples heated at 50 °C, 60 °C, 65 °C, 70 °C, 75 °C, 80 °C or PBS (as a control) for eight consecutive days (days-9 to -2). Subsequently, mice (n = 8 per group) were orally (by means of gavage) sensitized to 20 mg ovalbumin (OVA; 20 mg per 0.5 mL PBS; grade V; Sigma-Aldrich) using 15 µg cholera toxin (CT; List Biological Laboratories, Campbell, CA, USA) as an adjuvant (days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28). Sham-sensitized control mice (n = 6) received CT alone (15 µg per 0.5 mL PBS). OVA solutions were passed
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!