The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using facs diva 5

1

Tumor Immune Cell Profiling by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were minced and digested in a 1 mg/mL collagenase type IA (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD) solution for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were filtered through a 100 μm nylon mesh cell strainer (BD Falcon, Bedford, MA) and stained with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies for the identification and quantitative analysis of Tregs, TAMs and MDSCs populations by FACS as previously described13 (link). Labelled cells were analyzed on a FACS Canto II cytometer using FACS Diva 5.5 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed by FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA). The subpopulation of Tregs was identified by FoxP3 and CD45+, CD3+, CD4+, CD8-, CD25+ cell surface markers, while MDSCs were recognized by CD45+, CD11b+ and Gr-1+ markers, and TAMs as CD45+, CD11b+ and F4/80+. Polarization of TAMs towards M2 or M1 phenotype was assessed by measuring CD206 or CD86 surface markers, respectively. In addition, the M2/M1 ratio was computed from the quotient between the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values for CD206 and CD86 markers. Isotype controls were employed to establish background fluorescence. Cell populations were measured as cells per gram of tumor and total numbers of TAMs, Tregs and MDSCs recruited within the tumor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CD63 Expression in Lung Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parental or siCD63 ADC cell lines (H1437, H23) were trypsinized and cell suspension was incubated with 10 μg/mL anti-CD63 monoclonal antibody (ab8219, Abcam) for 30 min, subsequently tagged with alexa fluor 488 conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (A-11029, Invitrogen) for 30 min and fixed with PBS 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Labeled cells were analyzed in biological duplicates with a FACS Canto II cytometer using FACS Diva 5.5 software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Macrophage Phenotype Evaluation under Oxygen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine whether oxygen concentrations could exert a potential effect on tumor cells affecting macrophage polarization, CD86 and CD206 surface markers representative for M1 (anti-tumoral) and M2 (pro-tumoral) macrophage phenotypes, respectively, were appraised using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses. In order to collect RAW264.7 cells remaining on both sides of the transwell membrane, the inserts were firstly rinsed with 1x PBS and then transferred into bottom plates containing 0.05% trypsin/0.02% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich). The obtained cells were stained with CD86-PerCP/Cy5.5 and CD206-APC fluorescence-conjugated antibodies and analyzed on a FACS Canto II cytometer using FACS Diva 5.5 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA) to compute the median fluorescence intensities (MFI) of CD206 and CD86 markers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Aortic Cell Dissociation and Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed protocol is provided as Supplementary Information. Dissected aortas were minced and incubated with an aorta dissociation cocktail. For flow cytometry analysis, cells were fixed and stained with specific antibodies. Data were acquired on a FACS CantoII cytometer using the FACS Diva 5.5 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed by FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA). In all of the experiments, macrophages were identified as CD11b-F4/80 double positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Sorting of Nestin-GFP+ NLSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nestin‐GFP+ NLSCs were isolated as mentioned earlier and cultured for 14 days in laminin‐coated dishes containing growth media. Cells were removed from the flask using Versene (Thermo Fisher), counted, spun down at 5,000 rpm for 5 minutes in microfuge tubes, and resuspended in 100 µl 1% PBS‐bovine serum albumin (BSA) per 2 × 105 cells. Aggregates were removed by passing them through a 40‐μm cell strainer prior to sorting. Cells were then incubated on ice for 1 hour and later labeled with 5 μg/ml of rabbit antinerve growth factor receptor (anti‐NGFR) antibody (Advanced Targeting Systems, San Diego, CA, http://atsbio.com) for 2 hours. After three washings with 1% PBS‐BSA, cells were labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 anti‐rabbit antibody (Thermo Fisher) for 1 hour in the dark on ice. After three washings with 1% PBS‐BSA, cells were resuspended in 1% PBS‐BSA and sorted using a FACS Aria Sorter. Data acquisition and analyses were performed using BD FACS Diva 5.0.3 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACS was carried out on a BD FACS (Aria Sorter, San Jose, CA) at 4°C and a pressure of 20 psi, using a laser at the 488 nm line, a 530/30 band pass filter, a 100 mm sorting tip, and a 34.2 kHz drive frequency, sterilized with 10% bleach. This instrument allowed us to characterize cells by size as well as fluorescence. Low flow rate improved the purity of cell sorting. Data acquisition and analyses were performed using BD FACS Diva 5.0.3 software, gated for a high level of EGFP expression. The clear separation of EGFP+ from EGFP- cells explains the ease of sorting. Sorted cells were re-analyzed to confirm that all were EGFP+. They were then plated on laminin-coated dishes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Apoptosis and cell cycle analyses were performed separately using commercial Annexin V: FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I and CycleTest™ Plus DNA Reagent kit, respectively (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA). Cells were seeded at 5 x 105 cells per well in twelve-well plates. After overnight attachment, the cells were treated with the compound at 12.5, 25 and 50 μM for 24 hours for the apoptosis analysis and at 2.5 μM for 12, 24 and 48 hours for the cell cycle analysis. After treatment, the cells were harvested by gentle trypsinization and centrifuged at 1500 x g for 5 minutes. Cell staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A DNA QC Particles kit was used to calibrate the FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cell populations were subjected to cytometric analysis, and the quadrants were set according to the population of viable cells in the untreated samples. FacsDiva 5.0.3 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) was used to calculate the percent of cells in the respective quadrants for apoptosis analysis, and Mod Fit LT software (Verity Software House Inc., Topsham, ME) was used for the cell cycle analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Flow Cytometry Analysis of NCAM and CD44 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were double labeled with 10 μg/ml of rabbit polyclonal anti-human NCAM antibody (AB5032; Millipore) followed by AlexaFluor 647-labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) and inactive endosialidase-GFP fusion protein [33 (link)] in PBS. Parallel samples were labeled with AlexaFluor 647 mouse anti-human alkaline phosphatase antibody (B4-78; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and FITC mouse anti-human CD44 antibody (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Appropriate fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls were used for analysis. The cells were analyzed with FACS LSR II flow cytometer and FACSDiva 5.0.3 software (BD Biosciences). Cell debris and dead cells were excluded from the analysis based on physical parameters and propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence probing for cell viability (proportion of positive cells 1.2–7.0 %, data not shown).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!