The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Leksell model g frame

Manufactured by Elekta
Sourced in Sweden

The Leksell Model G frame is a medical device used in neurosurgical procedures. It serves as a stereotactic instrument, which provides a precise and controlled method for accessing targeted areas within the brain. The frame is designed to be used with imaging techniques, such as CT or MRI, to accurately guide surgical interventions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using leksell model g frame

1

Deep Brain Stimulation Surgical Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent preoperative neurology evaluation, neuropsychological testing, and on/off testing in the case of Parkinson’s disease. A stereotactic protocol imaging study was obtained prior to the day of surgery. On the day of surgery, a Leksell Model G Frame (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) was fitted under conscious sedation and a registration CT scan was performed, followed by computer-aided surgical planning. Depending on the stimulation target and patient, either “awake” placement with MER and stimulation testing or “asleep” placement under general anesthesia was performed. Intraoperative IPG’s and extension leads were routinely placed prior to exiting the operating theater. All patients underwent a postoperative CT scan of the head to assess for intracranial complications. As our institution does not allow scheduled nursing assessments more frequently than every four hours in general hospital beds, patients were observed in the intensive care unit for neurological monitoring and blood pressure control. Initial programming of the stimulation system typically occurred two to four weeks after surgery. Patients who did not obtain adequate symptom control, as determined by the patient and the treating neurologist, were offered DBS revision surgery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Metastases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GKRS procedures were performed as described previously. 30 Patients were selected for the GKRS procedure according to existing guidelines considering intracranial tumor burden, number and size of intracranial metastases, functional status, and systemic tumor control. GKRS plans were tailored to the individual patient situation considering size, number, and location of intracranial metastases and prior radiation therapy. All patients underwent GKRS using the Gamma Knife Icon unit (Elekta AB). We used frame-based stereotaxy with the Leksell model G-frame (Elekta AB). The frame was placed under local anesthesia with conscious sedation. Afterward, thin-slice CT scans were acquired and merged with the thin-slice contrast-enhanced T1-weighted brain MR images that were used for treatment planning. Planning MRI was performed within 1 week preceding the SRS procedure. Treatment plans were generated using the GammaPlan software (Elekta AB). GKRS dose planning was performed by a multidisciplinary team that included a neurosurgeon, radiation oncologist, and medical physicist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Protocols Across Gamma Knife Units

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SRS was performed using model U, B, C, 4C, Perfexion, and Icon Gamma Knife units (Elekta AB) depending on technology availability at each of the participating centers at the time of SRS. Frame-based stereotaxy was performed using the Leksell model G frame (Elekta AB), in which the patient was placed under local anesthesia with or without conscious sedation. Frameless SRS using a thermoplastic mask was used for hypofractionated SRS (n = 2, 3%) or when stereotactic frame application was not technically possible. Radiosurgical planning was performed using high-resolution pre-and postcontrast T1weighted MRI scans with 1-mm slick thickness. In rare cases in which MRI was contraindicated, stereotactic CT was used for SRS planning. SRS planning was performed by a multidisciplinary team that included a neurosurgeon, radiation oncologist, and medical physicist. At each center, planning was individualized based on patient needs and imaging findings. Radiosurgical parameters, including the margin and maximum dose, number of tumors treated, treatment volume (cm 3 ), number of isocenters, and number of fractions, were recorded for each SRS session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-session GKRS was performed using Gamma Knife unit models U, C, Perfexion, and Icon (Elekta AB). The first Leksell Gamma Unit at the University of Virginia was installed in March 1989. Leksell Gamma Knife model C was installed in 2001, Perfexion in 2007, and Icon in 2016. Radiosurgical techniques have been described in detail previously. 19 In brief, SRS was performed with frame-based stereotaxy using the Leksell Model G frame (Elekta AB); the patient was placed under local anesthesia with conscious sedation. Initially, stereotactic CT scanning was used for treatment planning, but around the year 2000, high-resolution MRI became the standard of care. Currently, radiosurgical imaging typically includes highresolution 1-mm-thick pre-and postcontrast T1-weighted 3-T MRI scans. GKRS dose planning was performed by a multidisciplinary team that included a neurosurgeon, radiation oncologist, and medical physicist. Planning was tailored toward individual patient needs and imaging findings; however, the maximal radiation dose to the optic nerve, chiasms, and tracts was generally kept below 8 to 12 Gy. Radiosurgical parameters, including the margin and maximum dose, optic apparatus maximal dose, the isodose line, the tumor volume, and the number of isocenters were recorded in all cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Stereotactic GK SRS for Brain Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A stereotactic coordinate frame (Leksell Model G frame; Elekta Instruments AB) was applied under local anesthesia, supplemented with mild sedation in some cases. For target coordinate determination and dose planning, stereotactic Gd-enhanced T1-weighted axial MR images with a slice thickness of 2 mm, multiple slices of which covered the entire brain, were obtained. For dose planning, the Leksell GammaPlan (Elekta) was used. GK SRS was performed using a Leksell GK Model B unit (Elekta) from July of 1991 through June of 2003, a Leksell GK Model C unit (Elekta) from July of 2003 through November of 2013, and thereafter, a Leksell GK Perfexion (Elekta) through June of 2016. Standard, single-session GK SRS was performed. However, in 35 patients (3.8%) in whom the tumor volume was large, a 3-stage treatment was applied. 3 Our dose selection was based on our experiences accumulated during the 7-year period between 1992 and 1998 in Japan. The median dose at the tumor periphery was 22.00 (interquartile range [IQR] 20.00-24.00, maximum 25.00) Gy. In this series, peripheral doses of 15.00-25.00 Gy were used in more than 99% of patients. Radiosurgical parameters are summarized in Table 2. The mean/median CIs were 0.62/0.66 (IQR 0.53-0.74, range 0.08-0.88) and the mean/median GIs were 3.20/3.09 (IQR 2.83-3.39, range 2.27-11.4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Leksell Stereotactic Radiosurgery Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Leksell Model G frame (Elekta AB) was secured on the skull for patient immobilization under local anesthesia. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), thin-slice (1–2 mm) MRI, and MRA have been used for all patients since 1993 to facilitate target delineation. SRS was performed with the Leksell Unit Model B from 1993 to 2006, Model 4C from 2006 to 2013, and Perfexion thereafter (Elekta AB). The radiosurgical parameters and dose planning were determined by the treating neurosurgeon in consultation with a medical physicist and radiation oncologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline patient data included patient characteristics, AVM features, and SRS treatment parameters. Eloquent locations included the sensorimotor, language, and visual cortex, hypothalamus and thalamus, internal capsule, brainstem, cerebellar peduncles, and deep cerebellar nuclei. 24 Deep locations included the thalamus, basal ganglia, and brainstem. 28 The Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade, modified radiosurgery-based AVM score, and Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale score were calculated for each AVM. 24, 27, 28 SRS was performed using the Gamma Knife, and the specific model used varied by year and availability at each institution. The SRS technique for AVMs has been previously described. 30 In brief, the patient's calvaria was affixed within a Leksell model G frame (Elekta AB) under anesthesia. The nidal angioarchitecture and spatial anatomy of the AVM were delineated on DSA and thin-slice (slice thickness 1-2 mm) contrast-enhanced MRI or on CTA when MRI was contraindicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Awake Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Implantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants underwent awake lead implantation following conventional, frame-based stereotactic technique. Pre-operative MRI and CT head imaging were obtained for trajectory planning. Patients received sedation and anesthesia monitoring and local anesthesia prior to head fixation of a stereotactic Leksell frame model G (Elekta, Sweden). Frame registration was performed using an O-arm scan (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) set to stereotaxy protocol. For stereotactic coordinates, the StealthStation S8 System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used for pre-operative and intraoperative imaging co-registration with the trajectory targeting the ventral border of STN and skull entry made anterior to the coronal suture. Intraoperative microelectrode recordings and low dose O-arm scans were used to assess the trajectory. Macrostimulation was used for stimulation side effects. Final lead position was tested for symptom improvement and side-effect threshold. For this study, the implanted lead was connected to a conventional extension and its distal connector externalized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Implantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surgical technique has been described in detail previously.3 The operations were frame‐based (Leksell frame model G, Elekta Instruments, Linköping, Sweden) implantations of the DBS electrode 3387 or 3389 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in the cZi/PSA. Bilateral implantations were only performed in patients below the age of 70 with a significant tremor in both upper extremities. The target was defined on stereotactic T2‐weighted MRI as lying slightly posterior and medial to the visualized posterior tail of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on the axial scan showing the maximal diameter of the red nucleus (RN).4 The lead was implanted with the patient awake to allow for intraoperative evaluation using macrostimulation through the DBS electrode. Microelectrode recording was not used. Before implantation of the pulse generator (IPG) and the connection cables, the electrode location was verified on an intraoperative stereotactic CT merged with the preoperative MRI (Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!