The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sequencer v 4

Manufactured by Gene Codes
Sourced in United States

Sequencer v. 4.5 is a laboratory equipment designed for DNA sequencing. It performs the process of determining the precise order of nucleotides within a DNA molecule.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using sequencer v 4

1

Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis of Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For sequencing, obtained PCR products were used as the template. Sequencing was performed on an Applied Biosystems 3130 automated DNA sequencer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Vilnius, Lithuania). The resulting nucleotide sequences were analyzed in Sequencer v. 4.5 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
The identities and similarities of sequenced isolates were analyzed using the basic local alignment search tool (BLASTn) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database and MEGA 11.0 program [57 (link)].
The analysis used available nucleotide sequences of strains in GenBank: Theileria annulata (MF287940, MF287922, MF287951, MG569892, MG599093, MK737519, MK849885, MT341858), Babesia caballi (MT965768, MW714971, MT965770, MT463343, MH651222, MN156287, MT182023, JQ288736, OP077204, MN629354, MK288109, EU642513, MK288108, JN596976, LSDV (MH893760, MN072619, MN642592, MN995838, MH646674, KY702007, OM793602, ON152411, MW732649, MW355944, MW699032), Coxiella burnetii (KT954146, EU000273, MT920358, AB848993, KR697576, MT920352, KT391017, MT920355, MT920351, MT920353, KT391016).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluation of ITS2 Barcode Feasibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As the recent intensively recommended DNA barcode candidate, the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) was also adopted as the fifth region for species discrimination, and the sequences of ITS2 were retrieved according to Keller et al. (2009) and GenBank annotations.
Sequences were aligned and adjusted manually using Sequencer v.4.5 software (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The nucleotide sequence data of the four regions were deposited in the GenBank database (Table 1). All genetic distances were calculated using MEGA (5.0 Version) software. Average intra-specific distance, mean theta and coalescent depth were calculated to determine intra-specific variation and average interspecific distance. Theta prime and the minimum interspecific distance were calculated to determine interspecific divergence (Meier et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2010) . The distribution of intra-specific versus interspecific variability was evaluated by assessment of the presence of DNA barcoding gaps. Moreover, BLAST 1 and the nearest distance method were used to test the power of species identification as described previously (Sun et al., 2012) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mitochondrial DNA Control Region Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 634‐base‐pair (bp) fragment (domains I and II) of the mtDNA control region (CR) was amplified and sequenced using specific primers for torrent ducks L100 (5′‐CATACATTTATGCGCCCCATAC‐3′) and H774 (5′‐CCATACACGCCAACCGTCTC‐3′) that prevented amplification of a known nuclear copy (K. G. McCracken, unpublished). PCR otherwise followed standard protocols (McCracken, Johnson, & Sheldon, 2001). Sequences were edited using sequencer v.4.7 (Gene Codes Corporation) and aligned by eye using se‐al v.2.0a11 (Rambaut, 2007). All sequences are deposited in GenBank (Accession Numbers MN196318:MN196473).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Identification of H. pylori via 16S rDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From the samples confirmed, by microscopy and PCR amplification, to be positive for intracellular H. pylori, one sample was randomly selected, and total DNA was extracted from yeasts using the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation kit (M.O. BIO, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the instructions of the manufacturer. The 16S rDNA was amplified by PCR using universal bacterial primers 8F-(5′-AGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′), 1492R (5′-ACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The amplified fragments were purified and sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). To determine the taxonomic allocation of the fragments sequenced, their phylogenetic affiliation was analysed comparing the 16S rRNA gene sequence. Sequences were revised and corrected using Sequencer v4.7 software (Gene Codes Corp, Ann Arbo, MI, USA). The sequences were added to the updated and prealigned 16S rRNA gene database Silva (http://www.arb-silva.de/projects/living-tree/), compiling all sequences of all type strains for which an entry of high quality was found [34 (link)]. The sequences were aligned using the ARB software package (http://www.arb-home.de) [35 (link)] and manually improved. The tree reconstruction was performed using the neighbor-joining algorithm implemented in the ARB software package. The sequences were submitted to GenBank with the following access number MT477178.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sanger Sequencing for CIB2 Variant Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to further investigation, all potential disease-causing variants were validated using Sanger sequencing. Primers for exon 6 of the CIB2 gene (RefSeq: NM_006383.2 and transcript ID ENST00000258930) were designed using primer3 v0.4.0 (bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/) and any SNP’s in the primer-binding site were ruled out using the NGRL SNPCheck database (https://ngrl.manchester.ac.uk/SNPCheckV3/snpcheck). PCR amplification was performed using the FASTstart High Fidelity PCR system (Roche, Madison, WI) at 59°C annealing temperature. Amplified PCR products were purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP Purification System (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN) and sequenced on the Applied Biosystems 3730 sequencer (Genomics Core at Einstein, NY). The Sequencer v4.0.1 software (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI) was used to compile and compare the data to the CIB2 sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TP53 Variant Confirmation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A TP53 variant, previously reported as pathogenic in ClinVar in relation to Li-Fraumeni syndrome and/or hereditary cancer pre-disposing syndrome, was found in P65 and validated using Sanger sequencing. Primers were designed using primer3 v0.4.0 (bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). SNPs in the primer-binding site were ruled out using the NGRL SNPCheck database (https://ngrl.manchester.ac.uk/SNPCheckV3/snpcheck) prior to ordering. PCR amplification was performed using the FASTstart High Fidelity PCR system (Roche, Madison, WI) at 59°C annealing temperature. Amplified PCR products were then purified using the AMPure Purification System (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN). The purified products were sequenced on the Applied Biosystems 3730 sequencer (Genomics Core at Einstein, NY). The Sequencer v4.0.1 software (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI) was used to analyze sequencing files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!