The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mira3

Manufactured by TESCAN
Sourced in Czechia, United States, Japan, Germany, China, United Kingdom, France, Australia

The MIRA3 is a high-performance scanning electron microscope (SEM) designed for a wide range of applications. It features a field-emission electron source, which provides high-resolution imaging capabilities. The MIRA3 is equipped with advanced detectors and analytical tools to enable comprehensive material characterization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

516 protocols using mira3

1

Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanoparticles were supplied by Pishgaman Iranian Nanomaterials Company (Mashhad, Iran). X-ray diffraction (TESCAN MIRA3; TESCAN, Paterson, Australia) was used to confirm the nature of the nanoparticles. Nanoparticle size and shape were confirmed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, TESCAN MIRA3; accelerating voltage: 15 kV) and transmission electron microscopy (TESCAN MIRA3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Nanosorbent Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to study the morphological and internal structure of nanosorbents as well as the type of porosity, FESEM was used at Razi Metallurgical Laboratory and Bim Gostar Taban Laboratory (Tehran). To perform this test, the samples were rst covered with a thin gold coating and studied using FESEM microscope model MIRA III and device MIRA3TESCAN-XMU model( made in Czech Republic) with different magni cations of 50-150 KX. TGA test was performed in the temperature range of 0-600 °C at a rate of 10 °C/minute using device TG 209F3 NETZSCH(made in Germany). This test is to examine and discover how a substance behaves in various temperatures. XRD test was performed by the Dutch model PW1730 XRD to detect the crystal structure of the adsorbents in the angle range of θ -5.5 ° and θ2-70 and temperature of 25 °C. This test is based on X-ray diffraction and Bragg's law. EDS test was used to identify the constituent elements and determine their percentage in adsorbent. This test was performed using FESEM device manufactured by TESCAN(model MIRA III, Czech Republic). The FTIR test was performed to determine the functional groups in the structure of gravity with an infrared spectrometer in the wavelength range (400-4000/ cm) with the FTIR Tensor II model by German company BruKer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Ag@Glu-TSC Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesized Ag@Glu-TSC nanoparticle was characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Shimadzu, Japan). Size assessment and morphological properties of the Ag@Glu-TSC nanoparticles were performed using transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Zeiss 100KV model, Germany) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) (TESCAN MIRA3, Czech Republic). Also, the data from X-ray diffraction (XRD) was measured using diffract meter (Philips X'Pert MPD, Netherlands). Finally, the energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry (TESCAN MIRA3, Czech Republic) was used to analyze the chemical composition of Ag@Glu-TSC nanoparticle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nano-Sized Silica Particles via Ball Milling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A high-energy Planetary ball mill (Amin Asia Fanavar Pars, Iran) was used to grind the SA particles at a speed of 300 rpm for one hour, resulting in finely ground SA particles. The SA used in this experiment was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Germany. The morphology of the nano-SA particles was examined and confirmed using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy MIRA3 TESCAN (Brno, Czech Republic). The particle size of the nano-SA was also determined using FESEM on a MIRA3 TESCAN instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All prepared samples were characterized using several instruments, including Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Tensor II, Bruker, Germany) in the frequency range of 4000-400 cm−1, X-ray diffraction (XRD, Series S Max Finder Mira III, Tescan), and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX, Mira III, TESCAN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Novel Nano-Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals were purchased from Merck, Fluka, and Aldrich Chemical Companies. FT-IR spectra were run on a Bruker, Equinox 55 spectrometer. A Bruker (DRX-400 Avanes) NMR was applied to record the 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra. Melting points were determined on a Büchi B-540 apparatus. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was obtained by the BRUKER, (Avance). Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) images were obtained by a TESCAN, Mira III. The EDS-MAP micrographs were obtained on MIRA II detector SAMX from TESCAN company (France). Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using the “STA 503” instrument from BAHR company. The pH of the nano-catalyst was matured by the Metrohm model 691 pH/mv meter. The Reactions were conducted using the Mixer Mill model Retsch MM 400 which consisted of two stainless steel vials, each containing two stainless steel balls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Physicochemical Characterization of ZnO and CuO Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

UV-Vis spectroscopy (Tomas, UV 331), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (model PW1730, PHILIPS, Netherlands), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (AVATAR, Thermo, United States), and FE-SEM (MIRA III, TESCAN, Czechia) technique were applied to determine physicochemical properties of ZnO and CuONPs. Zeta potentials of each NP were indicated by DLS (model ZEN3600, MALVERN, United Kingdom). The intensities related to absorption peaks of ZnO and CuONPs were examined by UV-Vis spectroscopy in the wavelength range of 200 to 600 nm. XRD was applied in the scanning range of 10°-80°(2θ) using Cu Ka radiations of wavelength 1.5406 Å for identification of the crystal phases and determination of the average crystal size of NPs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Activated Carbon Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents and chemicals were purchased either from Fluka company (Switzerland) or Merck company (Germany). Both A-CQDs and A-CQDs/W samples were characterized by following methods; Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy of samples recorded using KBr pellets which were performed by PerkinElmer PE-1600-FTIR spectrometer. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns obtained using X′PretPro diffractometer, Panalytical-Holland, with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 A). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) performed by a TGA Q 600 analyzer, TA-America, under Ar flow at a heating rate of 20 ºCmin−1. UV–vis’s spectrophotometry of samples measured using Shimadzu UV 2100 151PC UV–Visible spectrophotometer at room temperature. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) imaging was carried out using a MIRA III, TESCAN-Czech Republic. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging technique was performed by an EM 208S electron microscope and conducted at 100 kV. energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was carried out on a SIGMA VP 500 (Zeiss) microscope equipped with an EDX measurement system. 1HNMR and 13CNMR evaluations were carried out with a BRUKER DRX-250 AVANCE spectrometer at 250.0 MHz and 62.5 MHz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD analysis was performed using a powder diffractometer (PHILIPS, PW1730, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) with a voltage of 40 v and A = 30 mA (2θ = 20~80°, rate of 5 deg/min). The morphology of the nanoparticles was estimated via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Model CM120, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), with a maximum voltage of 100 kv. The chemical bonds of the complexes were analyzed using an FTIR (Bio Surplus, Thermo Nicolet Avatar 370, San Diego, CA, USA) at the wavelength of 4000–400 cm−1. To determine the adhesion, hardness, consistency, and springiness of the hydrogels, a texture analyzer (TA. XT. Plus, Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (MIRA III, TESCAN, Brno, Czech), and thermal stability, investigated via TGA Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) (TA, Q600, Shicago, IL, USA), were employed. The analytical probe P/0.4 (4 mm diameter, stainless steel cylinder) was compressed in the hydrogels with a trigger force of 3 g triplicate at a speed of 1.0 mm/s and 20 mm in height to a 60% height of the sample’s deepness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Synthesized Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were characterized by different analytical techniques. Fourier transforms infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected on an FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker, Tensor 27, Biotage, Germany). The spectra were recorded from 4000 to 400 cm−1. The crystalline structures were analyzed by an X-ray powder diffractometer (Bruker, D8 ADVANCE, Germany) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). The pattern was recorded over 2θ range from 10° to 70° with a step size of 0.0100°/s. Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) was used to study the magnetic properties of the synthesized nanocomposite at room temperature. The size and morphology of the nanoparticles were investigated by transmission–electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai G20). The elemental composition of the nanocomposite was analyzed by EDS spectroscopy (TESCAN, MIRA III, Czechia). Quantitative results of cellular uptake of the nanoparticles were obtained by a microplate reader (ELISA, Infinite M200). The amount of drug-loaded on and released from the nanoparticles were determined spectrophotometrically at the wavelength of 420 nm (GENESYS™ 10S, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!