The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using nextflex chip seq kit

1

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation in Xenopus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies: The anti-Vegt (Sudou et al., 2012 (link)), anti-Foxh1 (Chiu et al., 2014 (link)), anti-Pol II (Bio-Legend
MMS-126R; Charney et al., 2017a (link)), and
anti-H3K4me1 (Abcam; Gupta et al.,
2014
; Hontelez et al.,
2015
) antibodies were previously tested. The rabbit polyclonal
anti-Otx1 peptide antibody was generated (GenScript USA Inc.) against the
peptide sequence GYTGTGLPFNSSDC (AA 288–301 of the Xenopus
tropicalis
Otx1 protein). ChIP: ChIP on X.
tropicalis
embryos was performed as previously described (Chiu et al., 2014 (link)). ChIP-qPCR
Primers:
See Table S5. ChIP-qPCR: qPCR was performed using Roche
Lightcycler 480 II using the Roche SYBR green I master mix with the default
SYBR green protocol. ChIP-seq: ChIP-seq libraries were
generated using Nextflex ChIP-seq kit (Bioo Scientific), analyzed using an
Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100, quantified using KAPA qPCR and sequenced using
Illumina instruments at the UC Irvine Genomics High Throughput Facility.
Sequential ChIP: The initial steps of ChIP were performed
as previously described. After incubation with the first antibody, elution
was performed using 1x TE, pH 8.0, with 10mM DTT, 500 mM NaCl and 0.1% SDS
at 37°C for 30 minutes. After the incubation, the eluate was diluted
10x with RIPA. The diluted eluate was incubated with the second antibody and
the rest of the ChIP was performed as previously described (Geisberg and Struhl, 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ChIP-seq Protocol for Yeast Genome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP-seq libraries were prepared using a NEXTflex ChIP-Seq Kit (Bioo Scientific Corporation, 5143-02) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing was performed on a HiSeq2500 platform (single-end, 50 bp). Sequenced reads were mapped to the S. cerevisiae genome (sacCer3) and processed using Bowtie251 (link) and SAMtools52 (link). Significant peaks were identified and annotated using HOMER25 (link). Quantification analyses and average plots were generated using DeepTools53 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ChIP-seq for Histone H3K4me3 Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed using antibody against H3K4me3 (Millipore, #07-473) as previously described (Billings et al. 2013 (link)). To obtain sufficient material for high-throughput sequencing, four ChIP reactions from a single preparation of spermatocyte chromatin were pooled after final DNA elution. ChIP DNA was concentrated using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitation of ChIP and input DNA was measured using the Qubit dsDNA HS assay (Life Technologies). Typically, 7–10 ng of ChIP DNA was obtained after concentration and used for the sequencing library preparation. For all samples, an equal amount of MNase-treated input DNA was sequenced as a control. Biological replicates for each genotype were prepared independently from different litters of mice. Libraries were prepared for sequencing using Bioo Scientific’s NEXTflex ChIP-Seq Kit (protocol version V11.11) without size selection. Amplification of the libraries was done with 20 µL ligation product, 16 µL water, 12 µL NEXTflex ChIP PCR master mix, 2 µL NEXTflex ChIP primer mix, and 14–18 cycles of PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ChIP-Seq Protocol for Histone Modification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Libraries for high-throughput sequencing were prepared using Bioo Scientific's NEXTflex ChIP-Seq Kit without size selection and a 50 ul, 14 cycle, PCR reaction. Sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. For initial peak calling raw sequences were aligned to the mouse genome NCBI Build 37 (mm9) using BWA (Li and Durbin 2009) with default settings. The alignments were subsequently filtered to retain only uniquely mapped reads. For H3K4me3 ChIP, peak calling was performed on merged biological replicates using MACS (v.1.4.2) (Zhang et al. 2008a) with input DNA for control and ChIP samples as treatment, setting the p-value to 0.01, and nodup = ‘all’. For PRDM9 ChIP-seq, peak calling was performed using MACS (p-value = 0.00001) and removing duplicate reads. All coverage profiles presented in figures were generated using the UCSC genome browser (smoothing window of 5) with bedgraph files generated from MACS after tag shifting. Quantitative analysis of differential H3K4me3 levels was determined using the R package DiffBind with a false discovery rate <0.01 [47] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ChIP-seq Library Construction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP-seq libraries were constructed with 1–10 ng of ChIP DNA or input control as a starting material. Libraries were generated using the NEXTflex ChIP-Seq Kit (Bioo Scientific) as per manufacturer’s recommendations. Concentrations of all samples were measured with a Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and fragment length distribution of the final libraries was analyzed with the DNA High Sensitivity Chip on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). All samples were normalized to 2 nM and pooled equimolar. The library pool was sequenced on the NextSeq500 (Illumina) with 1 x 75 bp and total 18.6 to 41 million reads per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP-seq protocol for Drosophila and mouse

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ChIP-seq, Drosophila S2 cells and mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) were cross-linked for 10 min with 1% formaldehyde. ChIP material was prepared independently for each cell type as described previously (Henriques et al. 2013 (link)). To ensure proper normalization between RNAPII ChIP-seq of control and Spt5-depleted cells, S2 cells and BMDM ChIP material were pooled in a 10:1 ratio (Drosophila to mice), and immunoprecipitations were carried out with anti-Rpb3 (Drosophila) and total anti-RNAPII antibody (mice; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, H-224). For the remaining ChIP-seq libraries, separate immunoprecipitations were performed with anti-cohesin (gift from D. Dorsett), anti-H3K4me1 (Millipore, 07-436), anti-H3K4me3 (Millipore, 07-473), anti-H3K27ac (Abcam, ab4729), and anti-H3K36me3 (Abcam, ab9050) antibodies. Immunoprecipitated material was purified using the Qiaquick PCR purification kit, and ChIP-seq libraries were prepared using the NEXTflex ChIP-seq kit (Bioo Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analysis of EV-DNA from BM-hMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracted DNA of 2 separate EV-preparations (one male and one female BM-hMSC donor) without and 1 after DNase treatment was fragmented using the Bioruptor (Diagenode, Boston, MA) with 7 cycles of 30 sec on/off followed by library preparation with the NEXTflex ChIP-Seq Kit (option 2; Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA) according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Fragment length distribution of the libraries was analyzed on a BioAnalyzer 2100 High Sensitivity Chip (Agilent Technologies). Diluted libraries (2nM) were multiplex-sequenced on the Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) HiSeq 2500 instrument (2x 125 bp paired end run, 100 million reads/sample).
The Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA mem) [48 (link)] was employed to align sequence reads to the human reference assembly (UCSC HG19). Based on these alignments, normalized coverage was computed over intervals of 500 kb using FREEC [49 (link)]. Coverage data were plotted with R [50 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ChIP-Seq Library Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Libraries were prepared using the NEXTFLEX ChIP-Seq kit (Bioo Scientific) following the “No size-selection cleanup” protocol and doubling the incubation times for all enzymatic steps. Each sample of ChIPed DNA was end-repaired and ligated to unique barcoded adapters to produce individual libraries. Libraries corresponding to samples to be directly compared to each other (e.g., +IAA versus −IAA) were pooled together and purified using 1 volume of Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter). The pooled libraries were eluted with 25 μl of elution buffer (NEXTFLEX ChIP-Seq kit) and amplified using the KAPA Real-Time Library Amplification Kit (PEQLAB) following the kit instructions. Last, the amplified libraries were size-selected to fragments of 200 to 800 base pairs by running them on 1.5% agarose gel and staining with 1× SYBR Gold (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to visualize the DNA on a blue light light-emitting diode screen and cut the appropriate fragments. The size-selected libraries were gel-purified with the Monarch DNA Gel extraction kit (New England Biolabs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Amplicon and Shotgun Sequencing of Microbiomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both shotgun and amplicon sequencing were performed with the Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) using the MiSeq reagent kit V2 (two 250-bp paired-end reads, 500 cycles) at the BCCDC PHL. Each sequence run included a positive control (mock community) and negative control (ultrapure water) sample, as described previously (17 (link)). Amplicons were generated as previously described, targeting the V1 to V3 regions of the 18S rRNA gene for the eukaryote-sized fraction and targeting V3 and V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene for the bacteria-sized fraction (17 (link)). Amplicons were purified using the QIAQuick PCR purification kit (Qiagen Sciences, Maryland, MD), and sequencing libraries were prepared using the NEXTflex ChIP-Seq kit (BIOO Scientific, Austin, TX) using the gel size selection option, both per the manufacturer’s instructions. The shotgun sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA), and gel-size selection was performed using the Ranger technology (Coastal Genomics Inc., Burnaby, BC, Canada) and targeting fragments between 500 and 800 bp (31 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ChIP-seq Library Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP‐seq libraries were prepared using NEXTflex ChIP‐seq Kit (#5143‐02, Bioo Scientific) following the manufacturer's protocol (V12.10) with some modifications. Briefly, 10 ng of ChIP‐enriched DNA or input DNA was end‐repaired using T4 DNA polymerase, Klenow DNA polymerase, and T4 PNK, then size‐selected, and cleaned‐up using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (#A63881, Beckman). A single “A” nucleotide was added to the 3′ ends of the blunt DNA fragments with a Klenow fragment (3′ to 5′exo minus). The ends of the DNA fragments were ligated to double‐stranded barcoded DNA adapters (NEXTflex ChIP‐seq Barcodes‐6, #514120, Bioo Scientific) using T4 DNA Ligase. The ligated products were enriched by PCR [2 min at 98°C; (30 s at 98°C, 30 s at 65°C, 60 s at 72°C) × 14 cycles; 4 min at 72°C] and cleaned‐up using Agencourt AMPure XP beads. Prior to analyses, DNA libraries were checked for quality and quantified using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). The libraries were loaded in the flowcell at 8 pM concentration, and clusters were generated using the Cbot and sequenced on the Illumina Genome Hiseq2500 as single‐end 50 base reads following Illumina's instructions. Image analysis and base calling were performed using RTA and CASAVA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!