The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rnalater solution

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany, Lithuania, United Kingdom, Canada, France, Japan, Israel, Australia, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden

RNAlater solution is a nucleic acid stabilization reagent that immediately stabilizes and protects RNA in fresh tissue samples. It preserves the RNA in tissues and cells, preventing degradation and allowing for reliable downstream analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

1 081 protocols using rnalater solution

1

Orexin Modulation in Rodent Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On experiment days 1–5, the animals were injected IP with DEX or vehicle. On experiment day 5 between 16:00–18:00, animals were deeply anesthetized (mice with a ketamine-xylazine-acepromazine cocktail, rats with 4% isofluorane), decapitated, and whole brains removed. This time point coincides with the expected orexin nadir.[10 (link)] For mouse in situ hybridization, whole brains were frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C until the time of assay. For mice and rat hypothalamus mRNA expression and for rat hypothalamus quantitative orexin protein analysis, hypothalamic blocks (including the hypothalamus, most diencephalic structures, and the prefrontal cortex) were excised from the whole brain as described previously.[32 (link)] Blocks were preserved in RNAlater solution (Ambion), stored at 4°C overnight, then frozen at -80°C without RNAlater solution until the time of assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anaerobic Isolation of Planktonic and Biofilm Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Planktonic cells from the surrounding medium were transferred to centrifuge tubes with O-ring seals under anaerobic conditions in the anaerobic chamber and collected by centrifuging at room temperature (6,000 ×g). To keep their gene expression profiles intact, the planktonic cells were put into a RNALater solution immediately (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (Bachoon et al., 2001 (link); Mason et al., 2012 (link); Shi et al., 2013 (link); Qi et al., 2014 (link)).
For the D. vulgaris biofilms, superficial cells of the mature biofilm formed on the surface of SS slides were slightly washed off with 50 mM oxygen-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 6.5) using a dropper under anaerobic conditions in the anaerobic chamber, then inner mature biofilm cells were scraped using a sterile razor blade from the surface of SS slides. To keep their gene expression profiles intact, the biofilm cells were also put into a RNALater solution immediately (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (Zhang et al., 2007 (link)). The suspension of biofilm cells was then heavily vortexed to release single D. vulgaris cells to be used for single-cell isolation (Chalmers et al., 2007 (link); Marcy et al., 2007 (link); Zhang et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tissue Preservation and RNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After collection, the biopsy fragments were immediately placed into an RNAlater solution (Applied Biosystems™, USA) and stored at -20 °C until use. Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), and RNA concentration and quality were measured using the NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, USA). The concentration was adjusted to 500 ng, and cDNA synthesis was conducted using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits (Applied Biosystems™, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lung RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At various time points after infection, lungs were manually excised and immersed in RNAlater solution (Applied Biosystems). Total RNA was isolated from lung homogenates using RNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was carried out using the Applied Biosystems High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit. Real Time PCR was performed on the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system. Primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Collection and Preservation of Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh fecal material (between 10 and 50 g per person) was collected in a sterile container and immediately manipulated and homogenized within a maximum of 3 h from defecation. During the waiting period, from defecation to homogenization, samples were kept at 4°C. Thirty milliliters of RNAlater solution (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was added to 10 g of sample, and the mixture was homogenized in a sterile bag, using a stomacher apparatus (IUL Instruments, Barcelona, Spain) with three cycles at high speed, 1 min per cycle. Homogenized samples were then stored at −80°C until use.
For DNA extraction, samples were thawed and the QIAamp DNA stool minikit (Qiagen Ltd., Strasse, Germany) was used as previously described (35 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histology and Gene Expression of Fish Intestine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the trial, 9 fish per tank (27 fish/treatment) were randomly netted and euthanized following UK Home Office schedule 1 procedures prior to sampling under a microdissection microscope. Among these, 3 fish per tank (9 fish/treatment) were dissected for histology as follows. Posterior intestinal (PI) samples were excised and digesta was removed using phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.2, Sigma Aldrich, UK), fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (pH 7.0; Sigma Aldrich, UK) kept at 4°C for 24 h followed by long-term storage in 70% ethanol at room temperature until processing.
The remaining 6 fish per tank were sampled for gene expression analysis as follows. PI samples were excised and stored in 500 µl of RNA later solution (Applied Biosystems, UK) and kept at 4°C for 24 h then at -80°C until processing. For each biological replicate, PI from 3 fish per tank were pooled together giving 2 samples per tank (6 samples/treatment).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fecal Microbiome Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh fecal material (between 10 and 50 grams per person) was collected in sterile containers and immediately manipulated and homogenized within a maximum of 3 hours from defecation. During the time between defecation to homogenization, samples were kept at 4°C. Thirty ml of RNAlater solution (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) were added to 10 grams of sample and the mixture was homogenized in sterile bags, using a stomacher apparatus (IUL Instruments, Barcelona, Spain) (three cycles at high speed, one minute per cycle). Homogenized samples were then stored at -80°C until use. For DNA extraction, samples were thawed and the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit was used (Qiagen Ltd., Strasse, Germany), as previously described [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation of High-Quality RNA and DNA from Melanoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After surgical excision, the fresh tissues were immediately placed in RNA later solution (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA), and high-quality total RNA was prepared from the primary melanoma tissues using the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the supplier's protocol (Qiagen, GmbH, Germany). The obtained RNA concentrations were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Wilmington, Delaware, USA). The RNA sample integrity was determined with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser using the RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All RNA samples exhibited a 28S/18S ribosomal RNA ratio greater than 1.5.
The G-spin Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Intron, Korea) was used to isolate high-molecular-weight DNA from primary melanomas according to the manufacturer's protocol. To determine the quantity of DNA obtained, we used a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer. The DNA integrity was verified via 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in Swine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analyses described below were performed on 38 swine randomly selected from 10 different farms, among which 19 females and 19 males. Experimentally infected animals were not included in this study and the ones that tested positive for toxoplasmosis were naturally infected. Animals were given progressive numbers from 1 to 38 based on the sampling order at the time of slaughter. None of the sampled animals showed clinical signs at the time of slaughter. Samples collected and the corresponding analyses performed are listed in Table-1.
Among listed samples, the tissue sections to be processed for the molecular diagnosis of T. gondii contamination were put in sterile containers, while small aliquots of brain tissue, skeletal muscle, cecum, and lymph node, intended for gene expression evaluation, were immediately placed in sterile RNase-free containers containing RNAlater solution (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), to preserve them from RNase degradation. All samples were maintained refrigerated until processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Kidney RNA Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The left kidney tissue sample was permeated with RNA later solution™ (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and stored at −80°C. The tissue samples were sufficiently lysed in liquid nitrogen and total RNA was extracted using the mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit™ (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and assessed with the NanoDrop ND-1000™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) (17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!