The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Em stainer

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in United States, Germany

The EM Stainer is a laboratory equipment designed for the staining of samples for electron microscopy. It provides a consistent and efficient method to prepare specimens for examination under an electron microscope. The core function of the EM Stainer is to apply stains and contrasting agents to thin sections of materials, ensuring proper visualization and analysis of the sample's ultrastructural details.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

54 protocols using em stainer

1

Transmission Electron Microscopy Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was performed at the High Resolution Electron Microscopy Facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Samples were fixed with a solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, then washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered cacodylate-buffered tannic acid, postfixed with 1% buffered osmium, and stained en bloc with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, infiltrated, and embedded in LX-112 medium. The samples were polymerized in an oven at 60 °C for approximately 3 days. Ultrathin sections were cut using a Leica Ultracut microtome, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer, and examined using a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Inc.) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Digital images were obtained using the AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of Cortical Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cortical neurons were grown as described above. Neurons were treated with 5 μM 10-NCP for 4 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and fixed with a solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Cells then were washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered buffered tannic acid, postfixed with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 30 min, and stained with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate. The samples were washed several times in water, then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, infiltrated, and embedded in LX-112 embedding medium. The samples were polymerized in a 60 °C oven for 2 days. Ultrathin sections were cut in a Leica Ultracut microtome (Leica, Deerfield, IL), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer, and examined in a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, USA, Peabody, MA) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Digital images were obtained using AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp, Danvers, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electron Microscopy of Fixed and Stained Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were trypsinized, washed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4), and fixed with a solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde/2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) for 2 h at RT. After fixation, the cells were washed with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) and postfixed with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 45 min at RT, and stained with 1% uranyl acetate. After dehydration in graded series ethanol, the cells were embedded in Epon 812 (Fluka) medium and were polymerized at 70 °C for 2 d. Ultrathin sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut microtome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer. Digital TEM images were acquired from thin sections using a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Peabody, MA) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV equipped with AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, Danvers, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to our previous report [17 (link)], samples were fixed with a solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, then washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered cacodylate buffered tannic acid, postfixed with 1% buffered osmium, and stained en bloc with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, infiltrated, and embedded in LX-112 medium. The samples were polymerized in a 60 ℃ oven for approximately 3 days. Ultrathin sections were cut in a Leica Ultracut microtome (Leica, Deerfield, IL), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer, and examined in a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Micrographs were taken at 7500 × or 50,000 × magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Synaptosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Similar to methods we have previously described [3 (link)], synaptosomes were isolated and fixed in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde plus 2% PFA in PBS for at least 24 h. Samples were then fixed with a solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde plus 2% PFA in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, then washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered cacodylate-buffered tannic acid, post-fixed with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 30 min, and stained en bloc with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, infiltrated, and embedded in LX-112 medium. The samples were polymerized in a 60°C oven for approximately 2 days. Ultrathin sections were cut in a Leica Ultracut microtome (Leica Microsystems Inc., Deerfield, IL), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer, and examined in a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Digital images were obtained using AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp, Danvers, MA). Quantifications were performed by two independent researchers using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TEM Analysis of Aeromonas salmonicida

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A. salmonicida stains harboring plasmids pHSG299 or pHSG299‐mcr‐3 were cultured to log‐phase in tryptic soy broth (TSB) medium. Bacterial cells were then collected by centrifugation at 2000 × g and washed once with PBS. Cells were fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde solution at 4 °C for 24 h. In preparation for TEM analysis, samples were embedded in Spur epoxy resin medium and polymerized at 70 °C for 3 days. Ultrathin sections were subsequently cut using a Leica Ultracut microtome (UC6i; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer. The sections were examined using a JEOL JEM‐1230 transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TEM Ultrastructural Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), samples were fixed with a solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered cacodylate-buffered tannic acid, post-fixed with 1% buffered osmium, and then stained en bloc with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, filtered, and embedded in LX-112 medium. The samples were polymerized in a 60°C oven for approximately 3 days. Ultrathin sections were cut in an Ultracut microtome (Leica, Deerfield, IL), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in an EM Stainer (Leica), and examined using a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Inc.) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Digital images were obtained using an AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp., Danvers, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
K7M3, LM7, and CCH-OS-D cells were treated with 1μM GCB for 48 hours. Next, samples were fixed with a solution of 3% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer, with a pH of 7.3. After fixation, the samples were washed in 0.1M cacodylate buffer and treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered buffered tannic acid. The samples were then postfixed with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 30 minutes and stained with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate. Samples were washed several times in water, then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, after which they were infiltrated and embedded in LX-112 medium. The samples were polymerized in an oven at 60°C for 2 days. Ultrathin sections were cut using a Leica Ultracut microtome (Leica), and these sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate using a Leica EM stainer and examined using a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, USA, Inc.) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Digital images were obtained using the AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transmission Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was performed at the MDACC High Resolution Electron Microscopy Facility. Samples were fixed with a solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, for 1 hour. After fixation, the samples were washed and treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered cacodylate buffered tannic acid, postfixed with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 30 minutes, and stained en bloc with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, then infiltrated and embedded in LX-112 medium. The samples were polymerized in a 60°C oven for 2 days. Ultrathin sections were cut using a Leica Ultracut microtome, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer, and examined in a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Digital images were obtained using an AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electron Microscopic Examination of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at (1.0–2.5 × 105 cells/well) in a 6-well plate and incubated for different intervals in amino acid-free medium. Samples were then fixed with Karnovsky’s fixative solution containing 3% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer at pH 7.3 and stored at 4 °C. After fixation, samples were submitted to the MD Anderson electron microscopy core facility for processing. Briefly, cells were washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and treated with 0.1% Millipore-filtered buffered tannic acid, postfixed with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 30 min, and stained with 1% Millipore-filtered (0.2 μM) uranyl acetate. The samples were washed several times in water and then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, infiltrated, and embedded in LX-112 medium. The samples were polymerized in a 60 °C oven for 2 days. Ultrathin sections were obtained using a Leica Ultracut microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer, and examined in a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Digital images were obtained using AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp, Woburn, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!