The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using gene 2.0 st array

1

Transcriptome Analysis of Skeletal Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the skeletal muscle specimens (approximately 50 mg each) using a reagent (RNAiso Plus 9108; Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration (ng/ml) and purity of the freshly extracted total RNA were measured using a microplate reader (Infinite M200 Pro; TECAN, Zurich, Switzerland), and the integrity of total RNA was determined with the 2100 Bioanalyzer and RNA 6000 Nano assay kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.). Only RNA with an OD260:OD280 ratio in the range 1.8–2.2 and RNA integrity > 7.0 were used in the microarray analysis. Total RNA was used to synthesize sense-strand cDNA (sscDNA) using the WT Expression Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, U.S.A.). Then, the sscDNA samples were fragmentated and labeled using another kit (GeneChip® WT Terminal Labeling Kit; Affymetrix®, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.) and hybridized to array plates (Gene 2.0 ST Arrays; Affymetrix®). Finally, the arrays were scanned using the GeneChip™ Scanner 3000 7G instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Skeletal Muscle RNA Extraction and Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the skeletal muscle specimens (approximately 50 mg each) using a reagent (RNAiso Plus 9108; Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), following the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration (ng/mL) and purity of the freshly extracted total RNA were measured using a microplate reader (In nite M200 Pro; TECAN, Zurich, Switzerland), and the integrity of total RNA was determined with the 2100 Bioanalyzer and RNA 6000 Nano assay kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Only RNA with an OD260:OD280 ratio in the range 1.8 - 2.2 and RNA integrity > 7.0 were used in the microarray analysis. Total RNA was used to synthesize sense-strand cDNA (sscDNA) using the WT Expression Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Then, the sense-strand cDNA samples were fragmentated and labeled using another kit (GeneChip® WT Terminal Labeling Kit; Affymetrix®, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and hybridized to array plates (Gene 2.0 ST Arrays; Affymetrix®). Finally, the arrays were scanned using the GeneChip™ Scanner 3000 7G instrument (Thermo Fisher Scienti c, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Profiling mRNA Profiles in Benzene Poisoning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Study subjects in mRNA microarray are mainly engaged in painting and control group is the office staff of the same unit. Chronic benzene poisoning was diagnosed according to diagnostic criteria and principles of occupational benzene poisoning (GBZ 68–2008). To control the impact of confounding factors, age, gender, medical history, the history of occupation and lifestyle such as smoking and drinking were matched showed in Table S1. And the detailed information was expounded as previously described [8 (link)]. mRNA microarray was performed as previously described [8 (link)]. Total RNA was extracted from human peripheral blood cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA), then purified RNA was amplified and transcribed into cRNA. cDNA was labeled and hybridized to the GeneChip Human Gene 2.0 ST Array (Affymetrix). The experimentations were scrutinized by GeneChip® Command Console® Software (AGCC), meanwhile, the acquired array images were analyzed by Affymetrix GeneChip Operating Software. Affymetrix® Expression Console™ Software were used to control QC analysis of Gene 2.0 ST Array data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LPS-Induced Inflammatory Response in PTP1B Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed description can be found in Supplemental Methods. PTP1Bfl/fl and LysM-PTP1B-/- mice (n=5 and 4, respectively) were injected with 0.5 mg/kg LPS i.p. for 3 hours. Microarray was performed using Gene 2.0ST array (Affymetrix), according to manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Analysis of Sickle Cell Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Message RNA was purified from PBMCs, labeled and hybridized to Affymetrix Exon 1.0 ST Array for 35 patients of Howard cohort (Zhang et al. 2014a (link)), and to Affymetrix Gene 2.0 ST Array for 134 SCD patients selected from UIC cohort. Probe sequences were aligned to human genome assembly GRCh37 to select for probes with unique perfect alignment. Probes that interrogate multiple gene transcripts and that contain SNPs with ≥1% minor allele frequency in dbSNP dataset were removed. Probe intensities were log2 transformed, background corrected and quantile normalized. Probe intensity was subtracted by the corresponding probe mean across samples. Gene expression level was summarized as mean intensity across probes within gene, using Gencode version 19. Batch effects of RNA labeling and array hybridization were adjusted using an empirical Bayes method (Johnson et al. 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!