The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

S 4800 field emission scanning electron microscope sem

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan

The S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) is a high-performance imaging tool designed for detailed analysis of materials at the nanoscale level. It utilizes a field emission electron source to generate a focused electron beam, which is then scanned across the sample surface to produce high-resolution images.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using s 4800 field emission scanning electron microscope sem

1

Aligned AuNPs on Graphene Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The target substrate was first prewet with 20 μL of 200 proof ethanol followed by drop casting of 20 μL of ethanolic mPEG-SH functionalized AuNP solutions onto 1 cm2 wrinkled substrates. The deposition was performed to yield uniform wetting of the substrate with menisci pinned at the substrate edges. Samples were dried overnight in a saturated ethanolic atmosphere. Aligned AuNPs on graphene were characterized by SEM in a Hitachi S4800 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Hitachi SU-70 SEM. Polarized UV–Vis measurements were performed with a Glan Thompson calcite polarizer in a Cary-5000 UV–Vis spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Waste-Derived Nanoporous Carbons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The processing waste-derived nanoporous carbons (freeze-dried citrus nanoporous carbon: CNPC1; zanthoxylum porous carbon: ZPC; olive porous carbon: OPC; air-dried citrus nanoporous carbon: CNPC2; citrus nanoporous carbon-based Fe3O4 composites: MCNPC) were synthesized in a typical process, as reported in previous literature, with some modifications [29 (link)]. Briefly, processing wastes, porogen, and ultrapure water (1:4:100, w/w/v) were mixed and stirred for about 8 h at 40 °C. Subsequently, the mixture was air-dried at 40 °C or freeze-dried to a constant weight and then transferred to a tube furnace and heated at 500 °C under nitrogen protection for 2 h. Then, the as-prepared samples were washed with 1M of HCl and deionized water, respectively, to remove any inorganic impurities such as porogen ZnCl2 until the pH value was about 5. Finally, the products were dried at 50 °C.
A Hitachi S–4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 20 kV was used to obtain the morphology of the prepared carbons. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were performed by a Bruker D8 diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) using the CuKa radiation. Fourier transform-infrared (FT–IR) spectra were recorded using a Nicolet iS10 FT–IR spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of CD Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Hitachi F-7000 FL spectrophotometer (Hitachi High-tech), TU-1901 dual-beam ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Beijing General Analysis General Instruments), and DXR smart Raman spectrometer (Thermo, United States) with an excitation wavelength of 633 nm, laser power of 3.5 mW, slit width of 50 μm, and acquisition time of 5 s were used to measure the CD system signals. The following were used to synthesize and characterize the CD systems: a desktop centrifuge (Zhuhai Heima Medical Instrument); ultrasonic cleaner (Shanghai Kedao Ultrasonic Instrument); SYZ-550 quartz sub-boiling distilled water device (Jiangsu Crystal Glass Instrument Factory); 79-1 magnetic heating stirrer (Jiangsu Zhongda Instrument Factory); HH-S2 electric heating thermostatic water bath (Jintan Dadi Automation Instrument Factory); KP-216 air energy light wave furnace (Zhongshan Qiaokang Electric Manufacturing, rated power 1200 W); pH meter (Mettler-Toledo Instruments Shanghai); Nano-2s nanometer particle size and zeta potential analyzer (Malvern, United Kingdom); and an S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi Hi-tech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Characterization of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phase and crystal analysis of the samples was carried out via X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) studies, which were performed using a Philips X'pert pro MPD Super diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The morphologies of the catalysts were analyzed using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM). The microstructures of the catalysts were characterized using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2100UHR) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) for mapping and cross-section compositional line profile analysis was carried out using FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-Twin HRTEM apparatus at 200 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained using a Thermo Fisher ESCALAB 250 analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with aluminum Kα radiation. Chemical component analysis was carried out via inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) using an Agilent ICPOES 730 spectrometer. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of samples were measured with Micromeritics ASAP 2020 nitrogen adsorption apparatus via N2 physisorption at 77 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescent Microsphere Drug Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We incorporated goat antimouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) Alexa Fluor 594 secondary antibody into PLGA microspheres to investigate the drug distribution in the microspheres, and these microspheres were observed under a fluorescence microscope with excitation wavelengths of 565 nm. The fluorescence images of the microparticles were captured. To observe the shape and surface morphology of KGN-containing PLGA microspheres, the freeze-dried KGN μS were uniformly coated on the surface of the conductive adhesive of the sample table and observed by a scanning electron microscope [S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM); Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan]. In order to measure the average size of the microspheres, pictures of three independent microparticle samples were captured, and ImageJ (United States) was used to calculate and present the average particle size distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Morphological Characterization of Astelia and Collospermum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological data were obtained for 410 herbarium specimens (Appendix 1). Data were obtained for ten specimens per species, including five staminate and five pistillate specimens for species with unisexual flowers. Measurements and scores were averaged across all specimens to give a mean value for each taxon. Flower and fruit color data were obtained from multiple sources including field observations, specimen label data, and taxon descriptions in national floras (Drake del Castillo 1893 , L. B. Moore and Edgar 1976 , Coode 1978 , D. M. Moore 1983 , Williams 1987 , Wagner et al. 1999 ).
Morphological characters that varied at or below the genus rank were measured or scored for all Astelia and Collospermum taxa in the field and/or herbarium. Herbarium specimens were studied under a dissecting microscope and measurements obtained using digital calipers. Pollen and seed characters were examined directly from material obtained from herbarium specimens after coating with gold-palladium using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission

scanning electron microscope

(SEM)
at the Biological Electron Microscope Facility, Pacific Biosciences Research Center of the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Images were digitally processed and the final plates were prepared in Photoshop 10.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Rigid Polyurethane Foams

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The apparent densities of RPUFs were measured according to GB T 6343-2009. Before the test, the samples were placed at the temperature of (23 ± 2) °C and relative humidity of (50 ± 5)% for 16 h. According to GB T 8813-2008, the compressive strength was tested on the H10KS electronic universal testing machine with a deformation rate of 5 mm min−1. The vertical burning test was conducted according to GB T 8333-2008 using six samples of (254 ± 1) mm × (19 ± 1) mm × (19 ± 1) mm with uniform density. Before the measurement, the samples were pretreated at (23 ± 2) °C and (50 ± 5)% relative humidity for 24 h. The thermogravimetric (TG) analysis was conducted on A NETZSCH STA 409 PC/PG thermogravimetric analyzer under the nitrogen atmosphere at the temperature range of 30–800 °C with the heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The morphology of gold-coated RPUF samples was observed on the Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Crystalline Phases and Optical Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallographic phases of samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray powder diffractometer (Bruker Corp., Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). Morphological observations were performed by a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tokyo, Japan). The diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were recorded by a Shimadzu UV-2600 spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere, using BaSO4 as the reflectance standard. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were obtained by an Edinburgh FLS920 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments Ltd., Livingston, England) under an excitation wavelength of 325 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!