The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using mix2seq

1

Constructing Fluorescent Protein Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid pDHL1029-mScarlet (pMV371) was constructed as follows; primers are listed in Table S1. First the mScarlet gene was PCR amplified from pmScarlet-C1 using oMV1367 and oMV1368, after which the resulting PCR product was digested with EcoRI and XmaI. Next the pDHL1029-msfGFP backbone was PCR amplified using oMV1373 and oMV1374, after which the resulting PCR product was digested with EcoRI and XmaI. Finally, the fragments were mixed together and ligated to make pDHL1029-mScarlet (pMV371). The final plasmid was PCR and sequence verified. All enzymes used were supplied from NEB.
All of the remaining plasmids created in this study (pCC1FOS derivatives) were constructed using λ red mediated homologous recombination [75 (link)], using exactly the same protocol as described above, in strain EPI300 (Lucigen). Correct integration of PCR products was further verified by sequencing (Eurofins, Mix2Seq). All primer sequences for constructing the pCC1FOS derivatives are listed in Table S1. The frt-flanked antibiotic cassette could be removed as previously described [76 (link)] and using the protocol described above. All the different loci targeted were PCR-validated and sequence-verified. Correct constructs were isolated from EPI300 after copy control induction, and transformed to the relevant background for competition assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cloning and Assembly of Genetic Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR was performed using Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (M0491, NEB) with DNA oligos from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). PCR products were gel purified using Gel Purification Kit (D4002, Zymo Research). To generate entry vectors, DNA fragments were inserted into BsaI-digested GreenGate empty entry vectors [52 (link)] via Gibson assembly (2× NEBuilder Hifi DNA Assembly Mix, NEB) or restriction ligation with T4 DNA ligase (NEB). Base editors, gRNAs, and fluorescent reporter vectors were assembled using Golden Gate cloning (30 cycles (37°C, 5 min; 16°C, 5 min); 50°C for 5 min; 80°C for 5 min) with BsaI or BbsI [52 (link)]. Vectors were transformed by heat-shock transformation into DH5α E.coli or One Shot™ ccdB Survival™ competent cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were plated on lysogeny broth medium containing 100 μg mL-1 carbenicillin, 100 μg mL−1 spectinomycin, 25 μg mL−1 kanamycin, or 40 μg mL−1 gentamycin, depending on the selectable marker. Plasmids were isolated (GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and/or Sanger sequencing (Eurofins, Mix2seq). All plasmids are described in Additional file 3. All primers are listed in Additional file 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CRISPR/Cas Efficiency Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant material was harvested for DNA extraction with the CTAB method [73 ]. Either the first true leaf pairs or entire seedlings were harvested, depending if the material was upscaled or not. A region around the CRISPR/Cas target site was PCR amplified using ALLin Red Taq Master Mix, 2X (highQu). The PCR products were analysed via agarose gel electrophoresis and purified by bead purification with HighPrep PCR (MAGBIO). The purified samples were sent for Sanger sequencing (Mix2seq; Eurofins Scientific) and analysed using ICE (https://ice.synthego.com/#/) and/or EDITR [41 (link)]. The ICE KO-score represents the proportion of cells that have either a frameshift or 21+ bp indel. See Supporting Tables for the list of primer and target sequences. The number of individuals analysed is specified for each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sanger and HiPlex Sequencing of Arabidopsis, Soybean, Maize, and Chicory

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Sanger sequencing of Arabidopsis amplicons, PCR was performed with Red Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix (VWR Life Science) according to the manufacturer's instructions and purified with magnetic beads (CleanNGS). The PCR amplified regions were Sanger sequenced via Mix2Seq (Eurofins Genomics).
Sets of HiPlex amplicons were designed for Arabidopsis (40 amplicons), soybean (40 amplicons), maize (117 amplicons), and chicory (two assays with 45 and 49 amplicons, respectively). Genomic DNA for each species was submitted for HiPlex sequencing (Floodlight Genomics LLC). For Arabidopsis and soybean, the sequencing was done on 24 biological replicates of the reference genotypes. For maize, 20 wild-type leaf samples and 36 transfected protoplast samples (10 gRNA arrays × 3 replicates plus 6 Cas9-only negative controls) were sequenced. Six technical replicates of the genotype L9001 (C. intybus var. sativum) were used as controls for the pooled sequencing run and two technical replicates of the L9001 reference genotype were included in the individual plant sequencing run. Details of the pooling strategy can be found in Supplementary Table S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Phage Characterization via PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Direct colony PCR was used to determine (i) the presence of the phage using sak primers, (ii) the integrity of the hlb gene using hlb primers, and (iii) attP using attPst primers (35 (link)) if the phage had spontaneously excised and was present in its circular form. Primer sequences and cycling conditions are listed in Table S2. For each reaction, a well-isolated colony was picked, suspended in 50 μL MilliQ water, heat lysed for 5 min at 99°C, and briefly centrifuged. One microliter was used as the template. To determine attP of induced phages in lysates, 1 μL of a 1:10 dilution of phage lysate was used as the template. Each single-reaction mixture was composed of 20.375 μL water, 2.5 mL Taq polymerase buffer, 1 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM), 0.5 μL deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), and 0.125 μL Taq polymerase (Thermo Fisher). PCR products were purified with GeneJET PCR purification kit (Thermo Fisher) and sequenced either by Sanger sequencing (Mix2Seq; Eurofins Genomics) for the Sa3int-phages derived from the LA-MRSA strains or by using an Illumina MiSeq system (sequencing depth varied from 10,000 to 180,000 [average, 100,000]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNP regions were PCR amplified, and the DNA was sent to Eurofins Genomics for purification and sequencing (Plate Seq Kit PCR or Mix2Seq, Eurofins Genomics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasmid Generation and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed information regarding the plasmids generated in this study are provided in Supplementary file 5A. Plasmids generated in this study have been produced (i) by ligating annealed primers into BbsI digested plasmids (for cloning of sgRNAs) or (ii) by ligating digested PCR-amplified cDNAs into dephosphorylated plasmids. Phusion DNA polymerase, FastDigest restrictions enzymes and FastAP phosphatase were used (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For all plasmids, DNA sequencing (Mix2Seq, Eurofins Genomics) was used with the specified primers, to confirm that the desired sequence was inserted. All new plasmids have been deposited on Addgene. The plasmids ERmox-GFP (Addgene #68072, Costantini et al., 2015 (link)), Ub-G76V-YFP (Addgene #11949, Menéndez-Benito et al., 2005 (link)), mCherry-Mito-7 (Addgene #55102, Olenych et al., 2007 (link)), pEGFP-N1-ATG-FLAGC (Addgene #60360, Britton et al., 2014 (link)), pEGFP-C1-FLAGN (Addgene #46956, Britton et al., 2013 (link)), pICE-EGFP-FLAG-Ku70siR-WT (Addgene #46961, Britton et al., 2013 (link)), and pCAG-eSpCas9-2A-GFP (Addgene #79145) were provided by Addgene thanks to Addgene contributors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sanger Sequencing Protocol with EurofinsGenomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger sequencing was carried out by EurofinsGenomics in ValueRead or Mix2Seq tubes. Sequencing samples were prepared according to manufacturers guidelines but with 300 ng of PCR product per sample. Sequencing primers are described in (Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gel Purification and Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR band indicative of the homozygous deletion (320 bp in deletion clones HAP1 and HepG2) or on-target genomic alterations (∼1000 bp in deletion clone hTERT-RPE1 ΔR14) was excised from the agarose gel and purified using Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified DNA (75–150 ng) and the flanking sequence-specific primers (Supplemental Table S1) were sent for Sanger sequencing (Eurofins, Mix2Seq). Chromatograms and the analysis files are available under Supplemental Files. For the homozygous clones, the sequences obtained from Sanger sequencing were compared with the reference genome using the multiple sequence alignment tool T-Coffee with ClustalW parameters (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/tcoffee/) (Notredame et al. 2000 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sanger Sequencing of E. coli Plasmids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single E. coli colonies were picked and grown overnight in 3 mL of LB medium containing the appropiate antibiotics.
Plasmids were extracted and sent for Sanger sequencing (Mix2Seq, Eurofins, Germany) using the appropriate primers (Supplementary Table 9).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!