The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using somatostatin 14

1

Calcium-Sensitive Fluorescent Dye Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were loaded using the calcium-sensitive fluorescent dye Fluo-4-AM (Abcam, Cambridge, Great Britain) in the presence of 2.5 mM probenecid (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) the day after transfection13 (link),41 (link). 1 h after loading, cells were washed with C1 buffer using a BioTek Cell Washer, incubated in the dark for half an hour and washed again. For automated agonist application and measurement of fluorescence changes, a FLIPRTETRA device (Molecular Devices, San José, United States) was used. Viability of cells was tested by application of 100 nM Somatostatin 14 (Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland)42 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gα16gust44 Receptor Activation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HEK293T–Gα16gust44 cells were loaded with the fluorescence dye Fluo-4 AM (Abcam, Cat# ab241082), in combination with 2.5 mM probenecid (Sigma Aldrich, Cat# P8761) for 1 h in the dark at culture conditions as reported previously [9 (link), 34 (link)]. Briefly, the cells were washed with C1 buffer and incubated for half an hour in the dark at room temperature. Directly before the measurement, the plate was washed again with C1 buffer. To apply agonists and to detect fluorescence changes a FLIPRTETRA system (Molecular Devices, San Jose, USA) was used. As a cell viability control, somatostatin 14 (Bachem, Cat# 4033009) at a final concentration of 100 nM was employed. For calculations of ΔF/F values, the fluorescence changes observed for receptor transfected cells were mock subtracted using the corresponding identically treated cells transfected with empty vector. The data from three independent experiments, each performed in duplicates were checked for statistical significance using student’s t-test (two-sided; p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis and Surface Modification of Silica Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the chemical compounds and reagents used in the study were dissolved in ultrapure water (Milli-Q; resistivity >18mΩ*cm), if not specified otherwise. 1,3,5-trimethyl-benzene (TMB, 99%) was purchased from ACROS. Decane (99%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Cetylmethylammonium bromide (CTAB, AR), cetylmethylammonium chloride (CTAC, AR), anhydrous toluene (AR), ethylene glycol (AR), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, AR), tetramethyl orthosilicate (TMOS, AR), 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES, AR), 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS, AR), α,ω-bis-NHS-PEG, EDC (N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimide) and NH4OH (30 wt.%, AR) were purchased from Sigma. Absolute ethanol (>99.7%) was obtained from ALTIA (Finland, Etax Aa). Aziridine was from Menadiona, S.L. (Spain). Somatostatin-14 (Cat#H-1490) and octreotide acetate (Cat#H-5972) were obtained from Bachem (Switzerland), CYN-154806 (Cat#1843) was from Tocris (UK); the peptides were kept as 100 μM aliquots at -80°C. FSK (LC laboratories, USA; Cat#F-9929) was kept as aliquoted stocks of 10 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide at -20°C. Isoproterenol was from Sigma (Cat#1351005).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Screening Shark Bitter Taste Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The screening of bitter compounds was mainly done as published previously (7 (link)). The HEK 293T-Gα16gust44 cells used for the functional expression of shark T2Rs were seeded onto poly-D-lysine-coated 96-well plates using DMEM and supplements (10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% glutamine) at 37 °C, 5% CO2, saturated air humidity. When cells reached a confluence of 40 to 60%, they were transiently transfected with cDNA constructs coding for shark T2Rs using lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Empty pcDNA5FRT vector (mock) was transfected as a negative control. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were loaded with Fluo4-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) in the presence of probenecid (2.5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) for 1 h and then washed twice with C1 buffer and placed in a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPRTetra, Molecular Devices). Upon application of the bitter substances to the cells, changes in fluorescence were monitored. Cell viability was checked by application of somatostatin 14 (100 nM, Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Screening of Bitter Taste Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As described previously (13 (link), 23 (link)), HEK 293T-Gα16gust44 cells were cultivated on poly-D-lysine coated 96-well-plates under standard conditions [Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 10% FCS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% glutamine; 37°C, 5% CO2, saturated air humidity] and transiently transfected with expression constructs coding for the 25 TAS2Rs using lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). A transfection with empty expression vector was included for a negative control (mock). Duplicate wells were prepared for each compound-receptor combination. After transfection (∼24 h), cells were loaded with calcium-sensitive dye (Fluo4-AM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) in the presence of probenecid (2.5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) for 1 h, washed with C1 buffer (130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES; pH 7.4), stored in the dark for 30 min and finally washed once more. Cells were then placed in a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPRTetra, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The bitter compounds, dissolved in the C1 buffer, were automatically administered to the cells and changes in fluorescence were monitored. For screening, we used 1 and 10 μM of lactucopicrin. Vitality of cells was evaluated by subsequent addition of somatostatin 14 (100 nM, Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Functional Screening of Bitter Taste Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The functional screening experiments
were performed in accordance
with earlier publications.28 (link)−30 (link) HEK 293T-Gα16gust44 cells
were grown in poly-d-lysine-coated 96 well plates under standard
conditions (DMEM, 10% FCS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% glutamine;
37°C, 5% CO2, 95% humidity), and lipofectamine 2000
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to transiently
transfect cells with TAS2R cDNA constructs. Empty vector (mock) was
used to transfect cells as a negative control. On the next day (about
24 h after transfection), cells were stained with calcium-sensitive
dye Fluo4-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) for 1
h in the presence of probenecid (2.5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim,
Germany). Before the start of the measurements, cells were washed
two times with C1 buffer (130 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM
CaCl2, 0.18% glucose; pH 7.4), and a fluorometric imaging
plate reader (FLIPRTetra, Molecular Devices, San Jose,
CA) was used to monitor the fluorescence changes. Fluo4-AM in the
loaded cells was excited with 488 nm of light after automated application
of the bitter substances, and emission was recorded at 510 nm. To
ensure cell viability, somatostatin 14 (100 nM, Bachem, Bubendorf,
Switzerland) was subsequently applied to the cells at the end of each
experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Somatostatin Receptor Internalization Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown on coverslips for at least 24 h. For internalization studies, they were incubated with or without 1 µM somatostatin-14 (Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland) or octreotide (peptides & elephants, Hennigsdorf, Germany) in serum-free medium for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were washed with PBS, fixated in 1:1 acetone/methanol for 2 min, and incubated with anti-SSTR2 primary antibody (sc365502, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) diluted 1:50 in PBS overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with a Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (#115-165-146, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) diluted 1:1,000 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS, coverslips were briefly dipped into 96% ethanol, air-dried, and mounted on glass slides with Immu-Mount (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Mounted cells were imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM510, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) using a helium–neon laser at 543 nm, LP560 emission filter, and 40× or 63× NeoFluar oil immersion objectives. RIN-1038-SSTR2-GFP cells were not immunostained after fixation, but otherwise treated the same. To visualize GFP fluorescence, an argon laser at 488 nm, LP505 emission filter was utilized on the same microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preparation of Peptide Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetylcholine chloride (Sigma, USA) was dissolved in distilled water. Synthesized
S. murinus motilin (GenScript, Tokyo, Japan), human acyl ghrelin
(Asubio Pharma Co., Ltd., Hyogo, Japan), somatostatin-14, (Bachem, Torrance, CA, USA), and
octreotide (an SST analog; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were dissolved in 0.1% bovine serum
albumin/phosphate-buffered saline (BSA/PBS). CSST (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was dissolved in
DMSO (0.1% of final concentration). All reagents were freshly prepared immediately before
each experiment, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Functional Screening of Bitter Taste Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The functional screening experiments were performed as published previously (Lang et al., 2020; Ziegler and Behrens, 2021). Briefly, HEK 293T-Gα16gust44 cells were cultivated on poly-D-lysine coated 96 wells plates under regular conditions (DMEM, 10% FCS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% glutamine; 37 °C, 5% CO2, 95% humidity) and transiently transfected with cDNA constructs coding for TAS2R2 [26 (link)] using lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Empty vector (mock) was transfected as a negative control. About 24 h after transfection, cells were stained for 1 h with Fluo4-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) in the presence of probenecid (2.5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and then washed with C1 buffer and placed in a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPRTetra, Molecular Devices, San Jose, USA). After automated application of the bitter substances to the cells, changes in fluorescence (at 510 nm excitation and at 488 nm emission) were measured. Cell viability was confirmed by subsequently adding somatostatin 14 (100 nM, Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland) to the cells and measuring the fluorescence emitted by stimulation of an endogenous GPCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!