The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Freezeview software

Manufactured by Actimetrics
Sourced in United States

FreezeView is a software suite designed for the analysis and visualization of cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) data. The software provides tools for processing, analyzing, and interpreting cryo-EM images and molecular structures. It offers features for particle picking, 2D and 3D image processing, and model building. FreezeView is an essential tool for researchers working with cryo-EM technology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using freezeview software

1

Automated and Blinded Behavioral Scoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During testing, investigators were not blind to condition. However, results were replicated across several cohorts. Videos for behavioral scoring (i.e., freezing behavior) were analyzed using FreezeView softwares (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL) during sessions without light application. For sessions in which mice received photostimulation (silencing), the light coming out of the implants prevented automatic scoring and was therefore independently scored by 2 investigators. Other analyses of behavior such as ambulation in the open-field was scored automatically using MotorMonitor Software (Kinder Scientific, Poway, CA). Anxiety assessment in the elevated plus maze and novelty suppressed feeding tests were carried out by 1 investigator blinded to treatment and/or genotype. Sahay (PI) selected individuals in the lab to perform independent scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated and Blinded Behavioral Scoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During testing, investigators were not blind to condition. However, results were replicated across several cohorts. Videos for behavioral scoring (i.e., freezing behavior) were analyzed using FreezeView softwares (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL) during sessions without light application. For sessions in which mice received photostimulation (silencing), the light coming out of the implants prevented automatic scoring and was therefore independently scored by 2 investigators. Other analyses of behavior such as ambulation in the open-field was scored automatically using MotorMonitor Software (Kinder Scientific, Poway, CA). Anxiety assessment in the elevated plus maze and novelty suppressed feeding tests were carried out by 1 investigator blinded to treatment and/or genotype. Sahay (PI) selected individuals in the lab to perform independent scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Behavioral Scoring in Optogenetic Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During testing, investigators were not blind to conditions. However, results were replicated across several cohorts. Videos for behavioral scoring (i.e., freezing behavior) were analyzed using FreezeView softwares (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL) during sessions without light application. For sessions in which mice received photostimulation (or silencing), the light coming out of the implants prevented automatic scoring and was therefore independently scored by 2 investigators. Other analyses of behavior such as ambulation in the open-field was scored automatically using MotorMonitor Software (Kinder Scientific, Poway, CA). Anxiety assessment in the elevated plus maze and novelty suppressed feeding tests were carried out by 1 investigator blinded to treatment and/or genotype. Sahay (PI) selected individuals in the lab to perform independent scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Behavioral Scoring in Optogenetic Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During testing, investigators were not blind to conditions. However, results were replicated across several cohorts. Videos for behavioral scoring (i.e., freezing behavior) were analyzed using FreezeView softwares (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL) during sessions without light application. For sessions in which mice received photostimulation (or silencing), the light coming out of the implants prevented automatic scoring and was therefore independently scored by 2 investigators. Other analyses of behavior such as ambulation in the open-field was scored automatically using MotorMonitor Software (Kinder Scientific, Poway, CA). Anxiety assessment in the elevated plus maze and novelty suppressed feeding tests were carried out by 1 investigator blinded to treatment and/or genotype. Sahay (PI) selected individuals in the lab to perform independent scoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Freezing Behavior Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During testing, investigators were not blind to conditions. However, freezing behavior was analyzed using FreezeView softwares (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fear Conditioning Protocol for Memory Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fear conditioning was performed as previously described with some modifications (Huang et al., 2013 (link); Zhu et al., 2011 (link)). Briefly, mice were first handled for 5 min for two consecutive days. On the training day, after 2 min in the conditioning chamber, mice received two pairings of a tone (2,800 Hz, 85 dB, 30 s) with a co-terminating foot shock (0.7 mA, 2 s), after which they remained in the chamber for an additional minute and were then returned to their home cages. 24 h after training, mice were tested for freezing (immobility except for respiration) in response to the training context (training chamber). Freezing behavior was automatically scored by FreezeView software (Actimetrics). The percentage of time spent freezing was taken as an index of learning and memory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fear Conditioning in APP/PS1 Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
APPswe/PS1E9 mice treated with DMSO, AcA, or TTF were placed into a 17.8 × 17.8 × 30.5 cm chamber with two clear Plexiglass walls, two metal walls, and a stainless-steel grid floor (Coulbourn Instruments). The chamber was located inside an opaque isolation cabinet. The mice remained in the cage for 148 s before receiving a single 0.75 mA foot shock lasting 2 s. The mice remained in the cage for another 30 s after the shock before being returned to their home cage. Twenty-four hours later the mice were returned to the chamber for 5 min. Freezing was measured using a digital video camera mounted above the chamber and FreezeFrame software (Actimetrics). Percentage freezing time was analyzed using FreezeView software (Actimetrics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Auditory Fear Memory Consolidation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One day after training, rats received 20 presentations of the tones (30 s each) without any footshocks in context A. The intertone interval was of 60 s. Rats remained in the boxes for 60 s after the last tone presentation.
Digital cameras recorded the animals' behavior, and memory was evaluated by a blind experimenter measuring the time spent freezing during the tone presentation, using Freeze View software (Actimetrics). Freezing was defined as immobilization except for respiration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Contextual Fear Memory Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contextual fear conditioning consisted of a 2-min period of chamber acclimatation, followed by two presentations of a 2-s foot shock of 0.6 mA separated by 1 min. The mice were returned to their home cage 1 min after the last shock. After training, on day 2 and 3, the mice were placed again in the conditioning chamber for an extinction trial which consisted in placing the mice in the chamber for 15 min without any foot shock. On day 4, the mice were tested for contextual fear memory by placing them in the conditioning chamber for a 5-min period. For all tests, behavior was recorded and analysed using FreezeView software (Actimetrics, USA). Freezing, the conditioned response indicating fear memory retention, was analyzed for each mouse at in 3 min interval for extinction sessions and as a 5-min trial for the test sesión. Data are expressed as the percentage of time freezing in each interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!