The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using 0.1 m sodium cacodylate buffer

1

Ultrastructural Analysis of Bone-Adhesive Interface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone sections were demineralised and fixed simultaneously in a 10% formaldehyde-formic acid solution (Surgipath Decalcifier I) for 36 h. Two pieces of bone were used per adhesive system and fixed overnight in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK). The samples were then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd., Berks, UK) and subsequently dehydrated in an increasing series of acetone/water solutions (25 up to 100%) before being impregnated with epoxy resin. The resin blocks were then polymerised at 60 °C. Ultrathin sections (70–90 nm) were cut perpendicular to the adhesive bone-interface, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK) and then viewed on a TEM, (CM100, Phillips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEM Imaging of Fibrinogen-Coated Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 2 days of culture, specimens were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, UK) overnight, washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, UK) and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetraoxide (Sigma–Aldrich, UK) in cacodylate buffer for 1 h; then washed in cacodylate buffer, dehydrated through a graded series of industrial methylated spirit (20–60%) and ethanol (70–100%), equilibrated in 100% ethanol and left to dry overnight. Finally, specimens were mounted on stubs; gold sputtered coated (Agar Auto Sputter Coater, Agar Scientific, UK) and observed (FEI Inspect F, Oxford Instruments, UK).

SEM images of the different surfaces coated and non-coated with fibrinogen.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Bovine Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Treated and untreated BAECs, as described in the invasion assay, were examined via transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Briefly, the cell mixtures were fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, UK) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 6 h at 4℃. The cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 1,677 × g using a Minispin (Eppendorf), and the pellet was incubated with 1 mL of horse serum (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia) overnight. The cubic clotted samples were fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 2 h at 4℃ and washed three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific) before fixing in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide (Agar Scientific) for 2 h at 4℃. The fixed samples were washed again with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. The samples were then dehydrated with graded acetone 35% to 100% and infiltrated with graded epoxy resin 50% to 100%. Finally, the samples were embedded in beam capsules with resin. Ultrathin sections were obtained with an ultramicrotome and the sections were stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate (Agar Scientific) and lead citrate (Agar Scientific). The samples were observed and examined under a TEM (H-7100; Hitachi, Japan) operating at 100 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Hepatopancreas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hepatopancreas tissue was fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) for a minimum of 2 h at room temperature and rinsed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). Tissues were post-fixed for 1 h in 1% osmium tetroxide (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. Samples were washed in three changes of 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer before dehydration through a graded acetone series. Samples were embedded in Agar 100 epoxy (Agar Scientific, Agar 100 premix kit medium) and polymerised overnight at 60 °C in an oven. Semi-thin (1–2 µm) sections were stained with Toluidine Blue for viewing with a light microscope to identify suitable target areas. Ultrathin sections (70–90 nm) of these areas were mounted on uncoated copper grids (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) and stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) and Reynolds’ lead citrate [25 (link)]. Grids were examined using a JEOL JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope and digital images captured using an Advanced Microscopy Techniques (AMT) XR80 camera and AMT V602 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Zebrafish Tissue Preparation for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was processed for electron microscopy as previously described (Czopka and Lyons, 2011 (link)). Briefly, 4 dpf larvae were anaesthetised with tricaine and chemically fixed with microwave stimulation using a solution of 2% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, Essex, UK). Embryos subsequently underwent secondary fixation with microwave stimulation in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate/imidazole (Agar Scientific) followed by en bloc stain in saturated uranyl acetate (~8%, w/v, in water) (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd., Berkshire, UK). Samples were then progressively dehydrated in a series of ethanol and acetone washes before being embedded in Embed-812 resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Ultra-thin sections (70 nm thickness) were cut around somite 15 using a Reichert Jung Ultracut microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained using uranyl acetate (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd.) and Sato lead stain (see (Czopka and Lyons, 2011 (link)) for detailed protocol). Stained sections were imaged using a Jeol JEM-1400 Plus transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) at 8600x magnification. Individual tiles were automatically aligned using the PhotoMerge tool in Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA) and quantified manually using Fiji (ImageJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Placental Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed placental fragments were washed twice for 10 min in 0.1 m sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, UK) at pH 7.4 containing 0.23 m sucrose (BDH, UK) and 2 mm CaCl2 (BDH, UK). The specimens were then placed for 60 min in 2% osmium tetroxide (BDH, UK) in 0.1 m sodium cacodylate (Agar Scientific, UK) at pH 7.4, then washed three times for 10 min with distilled water. Samples were then treated with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate (Agar Scientific, UK) for 20 min. Samples were dehydrated using a graded ethanol series. Specimens were then treated with 50 : 50 Spurr resin : acetonitrile (Fisher, UK) overnight and infiltrated with fresh Spurr resin for 6 h. Finally, specimens were embedded in Spurr resin for 16 h at 60 °C.
Gold/silver ultrathin sections were cut using a Reichert Ultracut E ultramicrotome, stained with Reynolds lead citrate, and viewed by TEM to study structures associated with stromal vesicles and fibroblast‐like stellate cells (Tecnai 12, Thermo Fisher, Eindhoven).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Shear-Stressed Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5 × 105 cells submitted or not to shear stress assay were centrifuged at 200g for 5 min in a 1.5 mL polypropylene tube. The pellet was incubated with a solution of Karnovsky fixative at 4 °C overnight. The pellet was washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK), then post-fixed for 1 h in 1% osmium tetroxide (Agar Scientific) in sodium cacodylate buffer and then washed three times and finally re-suspended in 20 µL of cacodylate buffer. A 5 µL drop was introduced into the core of a warm (40–50 °C) 8% agarose fluid gel in a 1.5 mL polypropylene tube. Once solidified, a 3 mm3 block was cut around the drop. Dehydration process was performed by 3 successive baths of 10 min in 100% ethanol followed by incubation in propylene oxide. The sample was then embedded in Epon-Araldite and ultra-thin sections (65 nm with Leica EM-UC6 ultra-microtome) were stained for 10 min in 5% uranyl acetate and 5 min in lead citrate. The sections were imaged with a FEI CM120 transmission electron microscope at 120 kV, using a Gatan USC1000-SSCCD camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of 3D TE Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of T/L 3D TE constructs (n = 3) was performed following fixation in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, Essex, UK) for 8 h, followed by a second fixation and contrast stain with 0.1% osmium tetroxide for 90 min. Samples were stained with 8% uranyl acetate in 0.69% maleic acid for 90 min, dehydrated in ascending ethanol concentrations, and embedded in epoxy resin (all from TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd., Berks, UK). Ultrathin cross‐sections (60–90 nm) were cut with a Reichert‐ Jung Ultracut ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems Ltd., Milton Keynes, UK) using a diamond knife. Sections were then mounted on 200 mesh copper grids and stained with “Reynold's Lead citrate” stain (VWR, Leicestershire, UK) for 4 min. Images were obtained using a Philips EM208S Transmission Electron Microscope at 80 KV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Specimen Preparation for Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, UK) overnight, washed with 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, UK) and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Agar Scientific, UK) in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer for 1 h. After washing with 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer, specimens were dehydrated through a graded series of industrial methylated spirit (20-60%) and ethanol (70-100%). Finally, they were treated for 2×4 minutes with hexamethyldisalazane (Agar Scientific, UK) and left to dry overnight. Specimens were mounted on stubs, gold/palladium sputtered coated and observed (JEOL JSM 5500 LV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biofilm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biofilm on the surface of three untreated root canal models and three models from each treatment group were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (FEI XL30 FEG SEM, FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands). For this, samples were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific,) at 4 °C overnight. Then, they were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (50, 70, 90, and 100%) (Sigma-Aldrich Co Ltd.,), placed in hexamethyldisilazane (Agar Scientific,) for 5 min and air-dried. Samples were mounted onto aluminium pin stubs (Agar Scientific,), and sputter coated with gold/palladium (Polaron E5000, QUORUM Technology, Laughton, UK) before examination using SEM. The appearance of the remaining biofilm was assessed as was the morphology of the bacteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!