The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

198 protocols using omniscan

1

Formalin-based Fixatives and Gadolinium Doping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For this study we used several different formalin based fixatives as embedding media but only diluted 16% PFA for fixation. Two of these we made in the lab by suggested manufacturer’s procedures: from solid paraformaldehyde (#158127, Sigma-Aldrich) and from concentrated solution (Electron Microscopy Sciences, paraformaldehyde 16% aqueous solution, #15710) by diluting to 4% with Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (# PI28374, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). For comparison we also used ready-made 10% NBF (Sigma-Aldrich, HT501128).
PBS used as EM was doped with 0.05% NaN3 to prevent bacterial growth.
Gadolinium (GAD) doped fixative was prepared by 500 fold dilution of GdDTPA-BMA (gadodiamide or Gd-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-bis-methylamide, Omniscan, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) which makes 1mM Gd solution in PFA (in PBS).
GAD PBS was prepared by 500 fold dilution of Omniscan in PBS (with 0.05% NaN3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Imaging of Tumor Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All 21 patients underwent CT scans (GE Light Speed 16 CT; Siemens Somatom Definition 64 CT) with the following parameters: 120KV, 240–320 mAs, pitch 1–1.5 mm, matrix 380*380. Nineteen patients had MRI scans (Philips Achieva 3.0 T; GE Excite HD 3.0 T), comprised of axial and sagittal T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) (TE 14–23.7 ms, TR 400–754 ms) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) (TE 76–138 ms, TR 3000–5100 ms), sagittal fat-suppressed T2WI (TE 80–127 ms, TR 3200–5100 ms), and axial, sagittal and coronal contrast-enhanced T1WI (TE4.6–23.4 ms, TR 189–750 ms). For all patients, contrast agent (Omniscan TM, GE Healthcare, Ireland; Magnevist, Schering, Berlin, Germany; gadopentetate dimeglumine, Consun, Guangzhou, China) was administered at a dose of 0.2 mmol/kg and a rate of 2.0–2.5 ml/s, using a power injector (Spectris Solarisl EP, Medrad, USA; TennesseeXD003, Ulrich Medical, Germany) through the antecubital vein, followed by a 20 ml sterile saline flush. Eight patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations (Siemens, Germany), and semi-quantitative analysis was used to calculate the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of tumors relative to the surrounding tissue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T imager (Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions) using body-array coil as a receiver. Breath-hold cine CMR was performed using retrospectively electrocardiographically gated segmented imaging with steady-state free-precession (SSFP). Cine CMR images were acquired in vertical, horizontal long-axis and short-axis planes covering the whole LV. Typical imaging parameters were TR/TE 3.0/1.51 ms, flip angle 52 degrees, 256 × 256 matrix and 240 × 340 mm field of view. Slice thickness was 6 mm. The temporal resolution was 42–47 ms.
Ten to fifteen minutes after intravenous injection of a contrast agent (gadodiamide, Omniscan TM, GE Healthcare, 0.2 mmol/kg), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images were acquired in the same views as for cine images, using inversion-recovery turbo fast-low angle shot (FLASH). Typical imaging parameters were TR/TE 8.6/4.3 ms, 256 × 256 matrix, slice thickness 8 mm and interslice gap 20%. Inversion times were optimized to null the signal intensity of normal myocardium (250–300 ms).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the ultrasound procedure, all animals underwent scanning with the 9.4T MRI system (Bruker Medical, Boston, MA). The mice were placed in a birdcage coil (diameter 35 mm), while being anesthetized with 1 - 2% isoflurane and respiration rate was monitored throughout the imaging sessions. MR images were acquired using a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted 2D FLASH sequence (TR/TE 230/3.3 ms, flip angle: 70°, number of excitations: 6, field of view: 25.6 mm × 25.6 mm, resolution 100 μm x 100 μm x 400 μm), 30 min following the intraperitoneal bolus injection of 0.3 ml gadodiamide (GD-DTPA) (OmniscanTM, GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ). As previously reported, gadodiamide provides spatial information of the BBB opening by temporally enhancing the MR signal relative to the ultrasound parameters 48 (link). In addition, T2-weighted MRI was performed one day after the sonication to detect any potential damage using a 2D RARE sequence (TR/TE 2500/3.3 ms, echo train: 8, number of excitations: 8, field of view: 25.6 mm × 25.6 mm, resolution 100 μm x 100 μm x 400 μm). The sequences employed in this study have been previously optimized by our group 17 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR imaging of MDA-MB-435 tumor mice was conducted with a 3.0 T system (Philips, Netherlands) using an animal coil (Philips). During the MRI scans, all animals were anesthetized by inhaled isoflurane (1.5% in O2) at 2.0 LPM. A children’s scalp needle (size: 0.40; KDL Corp., China) was connected to a syringe to deliver gadoteridol (OmniscanTM, GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway). The protocol included anatomical MR imaging as follows: a T2-weighted spin echo sequence (RARE) was performed before contrast agent injection with a field of view = 160 × 116 matrix and 40 × 40 × 26 mm, repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 4,000/100 ms. A slice thickness of 2 mm with a 0.2 mm gap was used to cover the tumor region of interest (ROI). A gradient-echo multiflip-angle T1 map was produced before contrast agent injection with a field of view = 200 × 160 matrix, a 40 × 40 × 26 mm, TR/TE = 651/20 ms, NEX = 3, and flip angles of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70°. A slice thickness of 2 mm with a 0.2 mm gap was used to cover the tumor ROI. The parameters of DCE-MRI were the same as those above, except the fixed flip angle was 30°. After eight baseline image scans, 0.2 ml/kg of gadoteridol (total injection volume, 0.15 ml) was injected (over a period of 15 s), and then 40 images were acquired.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MRI Protocol for RF Ablation Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MR imaging examinations were performed at our institution with the same 3.0-T MR imaging system Skyra (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and two 8-channel surface radiofrequency receiving coils. The MR imaging protocol included transverse T1-weighted turbo spin echo and transverse T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequences. DW images were acquired prior to gadolinium chelate injection. Finally, a time-resolved MR angiography with Stochastic Trajectories (TWIST) T1-weighted perfusion weighted sequence was repeated 75 times during the whole process of contrast injection with 5 phases of blank scans before the injection of contrast agent. The total of 0.2 mL per kilogram of body weight gadoteric acid (Omniscan TM; General Electric healthcare, USA) had been injected both before and after RF Ablation treatment. The time interval of two injections was over 1 hour to eliminate the residual effects of contrast agent. Protocol details are shown in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Magnetic levitation of cells in Gd-based contrast agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
D1 ORL UVA cells were thawed and centrifuged at 125 × g for 5 min and supernatant was discarded. The cells were resuspended to 105 cells/ml in the culture medium with different Gd-based solutions; Gd-BT-DO3A (Gadavist®, Bayer), Gd-DTPA (Magnevist®, Bayer), Gd-DTPA-BMA (OmniscanTM, GE Healthcare), Gd-DOTA (Dotarem®,Guerbet) and Gd-BOPTA (Multihance®, Bracco) at variable concentrations of Gd3+ (0, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 mM), approximately 50 µl of cell suspension was loaded into the micro-capillary channel and the channel was sealed with Critoseal. The cells were levitated in the magnetic levitation device for 10 min and imaged every 1 min under the inverted microscope (Olympus IX-83). Levitation heights of cells (distance of cells from the bottom surface of micro-capillary channel) were measured with ImageJ Fiji software by performing threshold and particle analysis. In order to determine when cells reached to the equilibrium at a specific levitation height in different paramagnetic solutions, the time point that cells were approaching ±5% of the levitation height reached at 10 min was considered as equilibrium time. The levitation heights of D1 ORL UVAeGFP and MDA-MB-231dsRed cells in the medium containing 100 mM Gd-BT-DO3A were also measured by the same method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Breast MRI Imaging Protocol for DCE-MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Breast MRI images were obtained by a 3.0T scanner (Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a dedicated 16-channel phased-array breast coil in the prone position. T1-weighted DCE-MRI images were analyzed in this study, using a TWIST-VIBE sequence: repetition time (TR) 5.24 ms, echo time (TE) 2.46 ms, matrix size 182 x 320, slice thickness 1.5 mm, FOV 260 x 320 mm2, flip angle 10°, temporal resolution 5.94 sec/phase, and the total scan time 5min57sec. The contrast medium (Omniscan, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) was injected at the end of the third acquisition phase with a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight, then followed by a 20 ml saline flush at a rate of 2.5 mL/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized MRI Knee Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI of the index knee was performed using a 1.5T scanner (Signa (GE Healthcare)) with a phased-array knee coil16 (link). The following pulse sequence protocol was used: sagittal T1-w FS CE (TR = 600–800 ms, TE = 12.5–16.2 ms, acquisition matrix 256 × 160, slice gap = 0.6 mm, slice thickness = 3 mm), axial proton density FS (TR = 3800–4820 ms, TE = 31.2–32.5 ms, matrix 256 × 192, slice gap = 0.2 mm, slice thickness = 4 mm) and coronal STIR (TR = 3000–4760 ms, TE = 46.1–56.9 ms, matrix 256 × 192, slice gap = 0.3 mm, slice thickness = 3 mm) sequences. Post-contrast sequences were acquired starting 3 min after intravenous injection of gadodiamide (0.2 mL/kg body weight (Omniscan, GE Healthcare)) with all CE scans acquired within 11 min16 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Breast Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI examination was performed by using 3.0 T Philips Health care MRI scanners with 8-channel breast dedicated coils. Patients were maintained in the prone position, and the bilateral breasts naturally and symmetrically fell into the coil. All patients were asked to reduce their respiratory rate to avoid motion artifacts caused by breathing and the heart beating. The contrast agent (Gd-DTPA, 0.1 mmol/kg, Omniscan, GE Healthcare) was injected intravenously at a rate of 2.5 ml/s. Then, 20 ml saline was injected at the same rate to flush out the residual contrast agent. A total of 9 phases were scanned without intervals, and the first phase involved plain scanning. After intravenous injection, continuous noninterval scans were performed in 8 phases. The scan time for each phase was 58 s. The DCE-MRI sequences were acquired using a VIBRANT multiphase sequence as follows: TR/TE: 3.8/1.6 ms, FOV: 300 × 300 mm2, matrix size: 512 × 512, silence thickness: 1.5 mm. The second phase of dynamic contrast enhancement was selected as the object of image segmentation because the peak value of enhancement in the lesion area occurs within 60–120 s after injection of contrast agent [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!