The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

194 protocols using d max 2500 pc

1

X-ray Diffraction Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measurements were performed on a Rigaku D/MAX-PC 2500 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at 40 kV and 100 mA with a scanning rate of 10° min−1 and a 2θ angle ranging from 5° to 80°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Porous Carbon Spheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure of the experimentally prepared porous carbon spheres was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku d/max PC2500) in the range of 5 to 90°. The morphology and microstructure characteristics of the samples were observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, JSM-7800F) and a high resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL). The pore size and specific surface area of the sample were analyzed using an Isorb-HP2 analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments) to measure the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K under liquid nitrogen. The X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) was collected on a ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer with a mono Al Kα radiation. The Raman spectra were tested by a Renishaw 2000 System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Structural Analysis of Prepared Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The prepared products were morphologically analyzed using field emission scanning electronic microscopy (FESEM, JSM-7800F) and transmission electronic microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). XRD pattern was performed with a powder X-ray diffraction system (XRD, Rigaku d/max PC2500, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα in a range from 5° to 90°. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were determined with an Isorb-HP2 analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) at 77 K with liquid nitrogen. X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) was measured on a Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of CH3NH3PbI3 Microribbons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CH3NH3PbI3 microribbons grown on substrates were directly characterized with a cold field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S4800, operated at 2.0 kV, 10 μA) and an X-ray diffractometer (D/MAX-PC 2500, Rigaku, with Cu Ka radiation at λ = 0.154 nm). A Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer with a general area detector diffraction system (GADDS) as a 2D detector was applied for 2D wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) measurements. The calibration was done with silicon powder and silver benzoate. The TEM specimen was prepared by rubbing the grid with the microribbon arrays. The high-resolution TEM characterization was carried out on a FEI Tecnai G2 T20 microscope. A Dimension Icon SPM (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was used to perform the AFM topographic measurements of the CH3NH3PbI3 arrays. The photo response performance of the devices was studied under ambient conditions using a tungsten lamp with a power density ranging from 0 to 15 mW/cm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Perovskite Thin Film Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structures of the perovskite thin films were characterized using an X‐ray diffractometer (D/MAX‐PC 2500, Rigaku). A Lambda 35 UV spectrometer (Perkin Elmer) was used to obtain the UV absorption spectra of the samples. The test samples were prepared on a glass. The static PL and time‐resolved PL spectra of the perovskite thin films on FTO substrates were measured using an Edinburgh FLS 980 under the irradiation of a 405 nm pulse laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Graphene Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Graphene characterization. The OM was conducted on a Nikon Olympus LV100ND system. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out using an X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku D/MAX-PC 2500). The SEM images were obtained on a Hitachi S4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope. Electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD) measurements were carried out on ULVAC-PHI (PHI 710) Auger system equipped with the EBSD probe (EDAX, DigView). EBSD test was operated at voltage of 10 kV and current of 10 nA. The spot size was 20 nm and the angular resolution was of the order of 0.1°. AFM image was carried out on a Bruker Dimension Icon with a Nanoscope V controller using the ScanAsyst mode.
PEEM and -LEED were conducted in an Elmitec LEEM-III system (base pressure  10 10 Torr). The selected area for LEED is about 2 m and the electron energy was fixed to 50 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Porous Carbons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the obtained porous carbons was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6610LV and JEOL S-4800) operated at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a JEOL JEM-1011 microscope operating at 200 kV. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) was performed using a JEM-2100 F microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The crystallographic information of porous carbons was investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max 2500PC). Raman spectra were collected on a Renishaw inVia Raman spectrometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a 1063 photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, England) with Al-Kα X-ray radiation as the X-ray source for excitation. The textural properties were characterized by N2 sorption measurements at 77.3 K (Micromeritics TriStar II 3020). The specific surface area was obtained by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. The pore size distribution (PSD) was calculated by the nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) method. The total pore volume (Vtotal) was estimated from the adsorbed amount at a relative pressure p/p° of 0.99. Micropore volume (Vmic) was calculated using the t-plot method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Amorphous Silicon Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To adjust the film thickness, Alpha-step IQ surface profiler was used to measure the step height during the deposition, and the final device thickness was determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements. The density of a-Si (pristine) and a-Si (densified) films were characterised by X-ray reflectometry measurement (ATX-G, Rigaku, operated at 40 kV, 250 mA), and the spectra were collected using Cu Kα x-ray source (λ = 1.54 Å) with a scan range of 0–6 degrees in 2θ. X-ray photoelectron spectra (Nexsa, ThermoFisher Scientific) on Ti, Ti-Si, and Ag-Ti-Si films were measured using a micro-focus monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source ( = 1486.6 eV). The Ti-Si and Ag-Ti-Si films were deposited in the same procedure with the device fabrication, including the post RTA process at 350 °C for 5 min in the Ar atmosphere. The amorphous phase of a-Si (densified) and Ti4.8%:a-Si films were characterised by X-ray diffraction measurement (Dmax2500-PC, Rigaku, operated at 40 kV, 200 mA) using glancing incident scan mode with a scan range of 1 degree and a scan speed of 2 degree/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microstructural Characterization of Additive Manufactured Alloys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The block samples were cut along the building direction Z-axis using a wire electric discharge machine, 2 mm away from the base, and subsequently embedded for microstructural investigation and nanoindentation tests on the X-Y plane. The cross-sectioned samples were consecutively ground by #100, #600, #800, #1200, #1500, and #2000 grade silicon carbide papers to remove any surface oxides. Then ground samples were consecutively polished with 5 μm, 3 μm, 2 μm, 1 μm, and 0.5 μm grade diamond abrasive paste. Phase constituents were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/MAX-2500/PC; Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with Mo Kα radiation. The angle range of 15–45° and a step size of 0.01° was adopted during the XRD test. More details can be seen in our previous research [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of SiOx and Graphite Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical compositions and crystalline structure of SiOx, graphite were investigated via X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) (Rigaku D/max2500PC). The surface morphologies of the samples were tested via field-emission scanning electron microscopy (JSM-6360LV, Japan Electronics Co., Ltd Tokyo, Japan). The adhesion of the composite electrode was measured on a mechanical testing machine (Instron 2300) according to the 180 °C peel test. The tested electrode was made rectangular having the size of 270 × 44 mm, and then was pasted on the stainless steel testing plate with 3 M tape. The test speed was 300 mm min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!