The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using cd45 30 f11

1

Isolation and Analysis of Lymphoid and Splenic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LNs, and spleens where indicated, were incubated in digestion medium (RPMI, 0.1 mg/ml DNase I (Invitrogen), 0.1–0.2 mg/ml liberase (Roche) and 0.8 mg/ml dispase (Roche)19 (link). Collected single-cell suspensions were filtered. Spleen samples underwent red blood cell lysis. For flow cytometry, cells were stained with Ghostdye510 viability dye (Tonbo Biosciences) in PBS, followed by labeling with CD45 (30-F11, Invitrogen), CD45.2 (104, BD Biosciences), PDPN (8.1.1, Biolegend), CD31 (MEC 13.3, BD Biosciences) and Ki67 (SolA15, eBioscience), Madcam-1 (MECA-89, BD), CD21/CD35 (Clone: 7G6, BD), Cpt1a (8F6AE9, Abcam), CD4 (GK1.5, Invitrogen), B220 (RA3–6B2, BD), IL-17RA (PAJ-17R, Invitrogen) and CountBright™ Absolute Counting Beads (Molecular Probes). For detection of apoptosis, FRC were stained with FITC Active Caspase-3 Apoptosis Kit (BD Biosciences), as per manufacturer’s protocol. For in vivo cell cycle analysis, mice were injected i.p. with 1 mg of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU flow kit; BD Biosciences) 24 h before sacrifice. Data acquired with a FACS Fortessa (BD Biosciences), analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pre-incubated with a FcγR-blocking mAb (CD16/32; 2.4G2, BD Bioscience) for 20 min followed by incubation with specific mAbs for 20 min on ice. After staining surface molecules, the cells were re-suspended in fixation/permeabilization solution (eBioscience), and intracellular staining of FOXP3 was performed with a FOXP3 staining buffer kit (eBioscience). Flow cytometric analyses were performed on a LSR II system (Becton Dickinson), and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (Tree Star). Background fluorescence was assessed by staining with isotype-matched control mAbs. FITC-, PE-, PerCP-Cy5.5-, APC-, PE-Cy7-, APC-Cy7- or AlexaFluor 647-conjugated mAbs against CD4 (GK1.5), CD3 (145-2C11), CD11b (M1/70), CD11c (N148), Ly6c (HK1.4), MHCII (M5/114.15.2), 7AAD and FOXP3 (FJK-16S) were from eBioscience, CD45 (30-F11) and Ly6G (1A8) were from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell staining and flow cytometry, fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies to CD3 (clone S4.1; Invitrogen), CD4 (S3.5; Invitrogen), CD8 (RPA-T8; BioLegend), CD16 (3G8; BD Biosciences), CD45 (30-F11; Invitrogen), CD56 (NCAM16.2; BD Biosciences), CD57 (HCD57; BioLegend), CD107a (H4A3; BD Biosciences), perforin (δG9; BD Biosciences), granzyme A (CB9; BD Biosciences), and granzyme B (GB11; BD Biosciences), were used. Fluorochrome-conjugated IgG1 and IgG2b (MOPC-21 and 27-35; BD Biosciences) isotype control antibodies were also used in addition to a fixable live/dead cell marker (Invitrogen). Mouse anti-CD3 (S4.1) and purified anti-CD16 (3G8) mAbs were used for redirected ADCC. For confocal microscopy, mouse monoclonal antibodies to α-tubulin (236-10501; Invitrogen), mannose-6-phosphate receptor (MEM-238; Invitrogen), and perforin (δG9; BioLegend) mAbs were used. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies used were Rab27a, Stx11, and Munc13-4 (all Protein Technologies Group), EEA1 (Cell Signaling Technologies), WASP-interacting protein (WIP, Santa-Cruz), and Cathepsin D (Upstate). Secondary antibodies were donkey anti-mouse and donkey anti-rabbit (both Invitrogen). DNA was labeled with DAPI and actin with phalloidin (both Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pre-incubated with a FcγR-blocking mAb (CD16/32; 2.4G2, BD Bioscience) for 20 min followed by incubation with specific mAbs for 20 min on ice. After staining surface molecules, the cells were re-suspended in fixation/permeabilization solution (eBioscience), and intracellular staining of FOXP3 was performed with a FOXP3 staining buffer kit (eBioscience). Flow cytometric analyses were performed on a LSR II system (Becton Dickinson), and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (Tree Star). Background fluorescence was assessed by staining with isotype-matched control mAbs. FITC-, PE-, PerCP-Cy5.5-, APC-, PE-Cy7-, APC-Cy7- or AlexaFluor 647-conjugated mAbs against CD4 (GK1.5), CD3 (145-2C11), CD11b (M1/70), CD11c (N148), Ly6c (HK1.4), MHCII (M5/114.15.2), 7AAD and FOXP3 (FJK-16S) were from eBioscience, CD45 (30-F11) and Ly6G (1A8) were from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal antibodies used were EpCAM-1 (G8.8; BioLegend); CD45 (30F11; Invitrogen); Lin-biotin (eBioscience); CD19 (1D3), CD3 (145-2C11), CD11c (N418), CD11b (M1/70), Gr1 (RB6-8C5), and Streptavidin (BioLegend); NK1.1 (PK136; eBioscience); CD127 (A7R34; eBioscience); CD117 (2B8; BD); NKp46 (2941.4; eBioscience); and CCR6 (29-2L17; BioLegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tumor Immune Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tumors were harvested and digested with collagenase IV. The resulting cells were lysed with red blood cell lysis buffer (Beyotime, China) and passed through nylon mesh filters (70 μm). To analyze the T-cells, single-cell suspensions were resuspended in PBS labeling solution with CD45 (30-F11, Invitrogen), CD3 (17A2, BD), and CD8 (53–6.7, BD). CD11b (M1/70, Invitrogen) and Gr-1 (RB6–8C5, Invitrogen) were labeled single cells for MDSCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tracking Chimerism in Recipient Fetuses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recipient fetuses were tracked for chimerism in peripheral blood (PB) serially starting at three weeks of age. LDMCs were isolated as described above. Antibodies used for determining chimerism were: CD45 (30-F11, eBioscience), H-2 Kd (SF1-1.1, BD Pharmingen) or H-2Dd (34-2-12), and H-2Kb (AF6-88.5, eBioscience). Dead cells were excluded using Hoechst 33528 (Invitrogen). Percentage non-erythroid donor chimerism was determined by the percentage of total CD45+ events that express donor MHC class I (H-2 Kd or H-2Dd in Balb/c → B6 or Balb/c → B6.CD1d−/− chimeras, H-2Kb in B6 → Balb/c chimeras).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were incubated with an anti-FcγIII/II receptor antibody (clone 93) to block unspecific binding and Zombie VioletTM (Biolegend, Germany), a fixable viability dye. Thereafter, cells were stained with fluorochrome conjugated antibodies against cell surface markers: CD45 (30-F11, eBioscience, Germany), CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience, Germany), Ly6G (1A8, BD Biosciences, Germany), Ly6C (HK1.4, eBioscience, Germany), CCR2 (475301, R&D, USA), TREM2 (237920, R&D, USA), CD36 (HM36, Biolegend, Germany), in FACS buffer (PBS containing 2 % FCS and 0.1 % NaN3) for 30 min on ice and then washed and fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spleen and Heart Cell Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions from spleens and lymph nodes were obtained via passing through 70 μm cell strainers in cold PBS−/−. Hearts were collected and digested with Liberase TM (Roche). Erythrocytes were removed with lysis buffer (BD Biosciences) from spleen and heart cell suspensions. Cells were stained at the following dilutions of stock reagents: Live/dead Aqua Fluorescent Reactive Dye 1:1,000 (Life Techonologies), anti-mouse CD16/32 1:100 (2.4G2, BD Pharmigen), anti-mouse 1:100 CD45 (30-F11, eBioscience), anti-mouse 1:100 CD3ɛ (145-2C11, BioLegend), anti-mouse 1:100 CD19 (eBio1D3, eBioscience), anti-mouse 1:100 CD11b (M1/70, Biolegend), 1:100 CD11c (Bu15, eBioscience), F4/80 1:100 (CI:A3-1, Serotec) in Supplementary Fig. 5d, F4/80 1:100 (BM8, eBioscience) in Fig. 5d,e and Supplementary Fig. 5c, IL-10 1:80 (JES5-16E3, eBioscience), FoxP3 1:100 (FJK-165, eBioscience), Ly6C 1:100 (HK1.4, eBioscience) or anti-CD25 1:100 (PC61.5, eBioscience). An eBioscience intracellular staining kit was used were applicable. Samples were acquired on a fluorescence-activated cell sorting Canto II (BD) and analysed with FlowJo10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation of Immune Cells from Murine Ears

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare single cell suspension, ventral and dorsal sheets of the ears were separated from the cartilage and incubated for 90 min in CO2 incubator at 37°C in 1 mL volume of RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, #R7388) containing 0.25 mg ml−1 Liberase TL (Roche Diagnostics, #5401020001). The digested ears were passed through a 3 mL syringe to make single-cell suspension. The cells were filtered through 70 μm nylon mesh and washed in FACS buffer at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes. Cells were suspended in FACS buffer for further analysis. For surface staining the following antibodies were used at 1:100 dilutions in FACS buffer according to the manufacture’s specifications. CD45 (30-F11, eBiosciences), CD3 (17A2, eBiosciences), CD90.2 (53–2.1, eBiosciences), βTCR (H57–597, eBiosciences), CD4 (RM4–5, Biolegend), CD8 (YTS5167.7, eBiosciences), CD11b (M1/70, eBiosciences), Ly6G (1A8, eBiosciences), and Ly6C (AL-21, BD Pharmingen). For counting the cells AccuCount Fluorecent particles (Spherotech) were used. The stained cells were run on BD FACSymphonyA3 (BD Biosciences) and the acquired data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!