The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using scd 050

1

Characterization of Inorganic Composite Phases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens of the composite were sputter-coated (40 mA for 120 s) with gold/palladium (SCD 050; Balzers, Schaan, Liechtenstein) to characterize the inorganic phase of the composite by means of SEM (JSM 5600LV - JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) under the secondary electron mode (n = 3). Before the SEM analysis, the specimens were dehydrated in silica gel for 24 h and then submitted to carbon evaporation (SCD 050, Balzers, Schaan, Liechtenstein) for elemental analysis using EDS under a backscattered electron mode operating in high vacuum mode and an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Representative images of selected areas of the sputter-coated specimens were taken to characterize the morphological aspect of the composite, while a qualitative elemental analysis was performed on the carbon-evaporated ones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscopic Analysis of Cooked Mushroom

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to examine the changes in the physical structure of cooked mushroom. Briefly, the samples were collected after cooking, separated into mushroom cap and stipe, immediately soaked in liquid nitrogen, and freeze‐dried using a freeze‐dryer (FreeZone 6; Labconco). The freeze‐dried samples were mounted on the stub, sputter coated with gold in a sputter coater (SCD 050; Balzers, Liechtenstein), and examined with a microscope (TM‐1000; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Morphology Analysis on CPC Disks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell morphology on CPC disks was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (JEOL JXA-840A). For this purpose, samples were fixed in a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde (Prolab, catalog number 01P1005.01.A), 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Millipore, catalog number 104239), 0.03% picric acid (VETEC QUÍMICA FINA LTDA, catalog number 000910.06), and 1% tannic acid (Synth, catalog number 01A2012.01.AF) in DMEM for 30 min. Next, samples were washed in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma Aldrich, catalog number, 419494), and dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series. Samples were then critical-point dried (Balzers CTD 030) and sputtered with gold (Balzers SCD 050).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microstructural Analysis of Dried Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The changes during the drying were microstructurally examined using Scanning Electron Microscope (a JEOL model JSM 5800LV) at 5 kV. The samples were coated with gold in a Sputter Coater (BALZERS, model SCD050).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Light and Electron Microscopy of Intestinal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For light microscopy (LM), INCs were mounted onto glass microscope slides, suspended in water, sealed with coverslips, and then viewed under an Axiophot light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) operating in brightfield mode using the objective of 20× magnification. Representative light micrographs of cells were captured using a Leica DFC320 camera equipped with the Leica software application suite LAS V3.8 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Digesta samples taken after 0 and 120 min of the small intestinal digestion were stained with 2% (w/v) Lugol’s iodine solution and visualised under LM for detecting the presence of starch.
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), INCs were directly mounted on double-sided adhesive tapes on aluminium stubs, sputter coated with gold (SCD 050, Balzers, Liechtenstein), and viewed under a scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 200 FEI Electron Optics, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). Representative electron micrographs of cell samples were captured with accelerating voltage of 25 kV and using the xT microscope software version 3.0.7 (FEI Quanta, Eindhoven, the Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Dentinal Tubule Alterations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three specimens (8 × 8 × 1 mm) per group were fixed in gold-covered metal stubs (SCD 050, Balzers) and subjected to scanning electron microscopy (EVO HD LS-15, Carl Zeiss do Brasil Ltda, SP, Brazil), at 15 kV and x2000 magnification. The number of obliterated tubules was calculated for both sound and eroded surfaces in the same specimen, starting at the center of the sample and following northwest and southeast directions. A representative image of the specimen was used for quantitative analysis of dentinal tubules using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Betseda, MD, USA). Total number of tubules was determined by counting all the tubules present in the image (Fig. 3A), and the percentage of unblocked tubules was calculated23-24.
Example of Image J software for counting open tubules. Dentin surface on the sound and eroded dentin.A: Tubule count B: WF sound dentin group; C: WF eroded dentin group; D: NaF sound dentin group; E: NaF eroded dentin group; F: SnF2 sound dentin group; G: SnF2 eroded dentin group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SEM Analysis of Galled Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-galled leaves and rolling galls fixed in FAA (Johansen, 1940 ) were dehydrated in an ethanolic series (Johansen, 1940 ), critical point dried, mounted on stubs, and covered with 15 nm of gold (Balzers SCD 050) (O’Brien and McCully, 1981 ). The samples were observed in a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM - 6360LV) in the Center of Microscopy at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Starch Microstructure Analysis by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of the gelatinized starch was observed using a scanning electron microscope (TM-1000, Hitachi, Japan). The starch powder was dispersed and uniformly placed on the carrier platform before conductive coating in a sputter coater (SCD 050, Balzers, Liechtenstein) was performed, and then the sample was then firmly fixed by a rubber ear syringe. The images were taken under an acceleration voltage of 2 kV and were photographed at 3000× magnification according to a previous report [66 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SEM Analysis of Injection Molded Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the injection molded samples was performed with a field emission SEM (FE-SEM, Merlin®, Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany) using 2 kV acceleration voltage. Prior to imaging the cross-sections, the samples were freeze-fractured under liquid nitrogen and sputter-coated (SCD 050, Balzers AG, Balzers, Liechtenstein) with a thin gold layer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Cell Attachment on Zirconia Disks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to evaluate the morphology of the cells attached to the zirconia disks. In this study, 5×104 or 1×104 cells were seeded onto disks and incubated for 3 or 24 h, respectively, to observe the cell attachment and spreading. For conducting the SEM examination, specimens were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 2 h at room temperature and rinsed three times in deionized water for 15 min; then, each specimen was dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series (ranging from 30 to 100% ethanol), three times for 10 min at 4°C. Finally these samples were sputter coated with gold palladium for 60 s at 60 mA (SCD050, Balzers, Liechtenstein).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!