The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

1

Biomarker Assessment in Metabolic Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were drawn at the randomization visit of the trial after an overnight fast. After collection, samples were stored at −80°C. Plasma 3‐OHB was measured using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry as previously described.
12 (link) The lower limit of quantification of 3‐OHB with this method is around 3 μmol/L with a relative standard deviation of reproducibility below 10%. NT‐proBNP was measured by chemiluminescent micro‐particle immunoassay on an Abbott Architect i2000SR (Abbott, Germany) as described by the manufacturer. FFAs were determined by enzymatic calorimetric assay (Trichem, Denmark). Plasma insulin was determined by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia, Sweden).
13 (link) Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index for insulin resistance was calculated as glucose (mmol/L) × insulin (mUi/L) divided by 22.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triacylglycerol (TAG), glucose (Horiba Medical, Montpellier, France) and NEFA (Randox Laboratories Ltd, County Antrim, UK) were spectrophotometrically determined using commercially available kits and a benchtop analyser (Pentra 400, Horiba Medical, Montpellier, France). Plasma insulin was measured via an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). The coefficient of variance for HDL, TAG, NEFA, glucose and insulin were 0.70%, 0.97%, 1.57%, 0.55%, 3.85%, respectively. The adipose tissue insulin resistance index (Adipo-IR) was calculated as fasting plasma NEFA multiplied by fasting plasma insulin [35 (link)]. Adipo-IR is a surrogate marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance which has been validated against clamp-derived measures and in vitro adipocyte insulin responsiveness [21 (link), 35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Glucose and Insulin Tolerance in Maf Mutant Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was performed on 3- and 6-months old wt and Maf mutant mice after overnight fasting (12 h) using an injection of 2 g glucose/kg body weight as previously described64 (link). Measurements were taken at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes (min) after glucose administration. Insulin was measured from blood plasma samples of 6-months old mice using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia). For insulin tolerance tests, 6-months old mice were first sedated with a mixture of hypnorm (Vm21757/4000; Vetapharma; 25 µg/ml) and midazolam (Panpharma; 1.25 mg/ml). After taking blood glucose measurement at 0 time-point, 0.75 U/kg human insulin (Actrapid, Novo Nordisk) was injected in mice intraperitoneally. Blood glucose measurements were then taken at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes (min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Insulin Secretion Assay in INS-1 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rat insulinoma cell line, INS‐1 cells, were kindly provided by Dr. P. Maechler (Geneva) (Asfari et al., 1992 (link)). INS‐1 cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Invitrogen) including 10% fetal calf serum, and additions were as previously described (Lawrence et al., 2008 (link); Merglen et al., 2004 (link)). Cells were harvested using a nonenzymatic cell dissociation liquid (Invitrogen). Cells were resuspended in the above media and were dissociated before being seeded into 96‐well plates (40,000 cells per well). The medium was replaced with defined serum‐free medium containing TZDs, and other inhibitors at the designated concentrations. Rosiglitazone was purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich, while pioglitazone and lobeglitazone were kind gifts from Chonggundang Co. After 24 h of treatment, cells were washed with glucose‐free Krebs (NaCl 140 mM, KCl 3.6 mM, CaCl2 1.5 mM, MgCl2 1.19 mM, KH2PO4 1.19 mM, NaHCO3 2 mM, and HEPES (pH 7.4) 10 mM) containing 0.1% insulin‐free bovine serum albumin, and then incubated for an additional 60 min in 1 ml of KRBH buffer containing 3.3 or 16.7 mM of glucose. Insulin released in the medium was determined by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia). Insulin concentration in nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) was normalized against total protein in micrograms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Glucose Utilization and Insulin Secretion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glucose utilization was measured by following the conversion of [5‐3H]glucose into [3H]H2O. as previously described10. Cells were seeded in 24‐well plates and subjected to dox treatment. The cells were pre‐incubated in HBKRBB9, 10 with 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 5 mmol/L glucose for 0.5 h, and then incubated with HBKRBB with 5, 12.5 or 20 mmol/L [5‐3H]glucose. After a 2‐h incubation period, a 0.1‐mL aliquot of the incubation medium was transferred to a microtube and then placed in plastic scintillation vials containing 0.6 mL of distilled water. The vials were stoppered and kept at 37°C for 36 h to allow the [3H]H2O in the microtube to equilibrate with the water. Subsequently, the microtube was taken out and 10 mL of scintillation fluid were added.
For insulin secretion, cells were treated as aforementioned and then incubated in HBKRBB supplemented with varying concentrations of glucose, 5 mmol/L glucose (Glc) + 30 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L Glc + 10 mmol/L leucine + 10 mmol/L glutamine or 5 mmol/L Glc + 0.1 μmol/L glimepiride for 1 h. The media were then collected and assayed for immunoreactive insulin by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). Protein contents were analyzed after extraction with 0.1N NaOH using the Pierce 660 nm protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Plasma Biomarker Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Venous blood samples were collected into precooled potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) Monovettes (Sarstedt, Leicester, UK) and centrifuged at 1165g for 10 min at 4°C (Labofuge 400R; Thermo Scientific, Langenselbold, Germany). The plasma supernatant was aliquoted and stored at -80°C. Plasma concentrations of TAG, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were measured in duplicate using a benchtop analyzer (Pentra 400; HORIBA Medical, Montpellier, France), whereas insulin concentrations were measured in duplicate using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). The within-batch coefficient of variation for each assay was as follows: 1.0% for TAG, 0.4% for total cholesterol, 0.6% for highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol, 0.6% for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 0.4% for glucose, 3.3% for insulin, and 1.6% for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Glucose, Insulin, and GIP Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glucose in whole blood was detected with the glucose oxidase method using AccuChek Aviva (Hoffman‐La Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Insulin was determined by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). The intra‐assay coefficient of variation of the method was 4% at both low and high levels, and the interassay coefficient of variation was 5% at both low and high levels. The lower limit of quantification of the assay was 6 pmoL/L. Total GIP levels were determined with a mouse GIP enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kit (Crystal Chem, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA). The intra‐ and interassay coefficient of variation was <10% at low and high levels, and the lower limit of quantification was 2.5 pmoL/L. The assay showed no cross‐reactivity with glucagon, glucagon‐like peptide (GLP)‐1 or GLP‐2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Blood Biomarker Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were immediately separated by centrifugation and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Concentrations of plasma glucose were determined by Siemens Dimension Vista and serum insulin by enzymatic calorimetric methods on a Cobas e 601, and plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), plasma triglycerides (TG), plasma ALT, aspartate transaminase (AST), and plasma γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) were measured on a Siemens Dimension Vista (25 (link)). Blood samples were collected in ice-cold EDTA vials for glucagon, GLP-1, and GIP measurements. Plasma concentrations of glucagon (Mercodia Cat# 10-1271-01, RRID:AB_2737304), total GLP-1 (Mercodia Cat# 10-1278-01, RRID:AB_2892202), and total GIP (Mercodia Cat# 10-1258-01, RRID:AB_2895085) were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) in duplicate and run on a SpectraMax iD3 (San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metabolic Biomarkers in Hepatic Steatosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Within 1 week of the HS diagnosis, 12 h fasting blood samples were collected in an EDTA container, maintained on ice, and transported to the FJCUMR laboratory within 2 h. Upon arrival, the EDTA-plasma were immediately separated and stored at −80 °C until further analysis. Plasma aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) concentrations were measured according to standard protocols (ITC Diagnostics, Taipei, Taiwan). Blood glucose, total cholesterol, TG and insulin levels were determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) by using a Hitachi 911 analyzer. Insulin resistance was estimated using the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) by standard protocols and calculation (glucose (mmol) × insulin (μU/mL)/22.5) [35 (link)]. Plasma folate levels were measured using radioimmunoassay kits (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Total homocysteine (Hcy) levels in plasma were measured using a commercially available kit for fluorescence polarization immunoassay on an Abbott 130 AxSYM system (Becton Dickinson). Plasma concentrations of betaine and free choline were measured using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization–isotope dilution mass spectrometry, as described previously [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Insulin Resistance via Hand Warming

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To enhance blood flow to the hand, the participants were asked to immerse their whole hand into a hot water (40 °C) container for 5 min, after which the hand was dried immediately, and a finger was cleaned with an alcohol swab and then pricked with a lancet (Unistick 3 Extra, Owen Mumford, UK). The first drop of blood was wiped, and 300 to 600 μL of blood was drawn into microvette tubes (Sarstedt Ltd., Leicester, UK). The sample tubes were placed immediately into a centrifuge at 12,800× g for 15 min (Eppendorf 5415c, Hamburg, Germany) to allow collection and storage of the resulting plasma at −80 °C for subsequent batch analysis. Plasma glucose concentration was analysed using a benchtop analyser (Pentra 400; HORIBA ABX Diagnostics, Montpellier, France) using enzymatic, colourimetric methods (HORIBA ABX Diagnostics). Further analyses of fasting plasma samples were completed to determine insulin concentrations using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The intra-assay coefficients of variation for the duplicate samples were 0.7% for plasma glucose and 4.4% for plasma insulin. Fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were used to calculate the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!