The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

74 protocols using bevacizumab

1

Intraperitoneal Bevacizumab Treatment in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient-grade Bevacizumab was purchased as 100 mg Bevacizumab in 4-ml sterile phosphate buffer (NDC50242-060-01, Genentech, Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA). The solution was diluted in sterile phosphate buffer to 1 mg/ml for intraperitoneal injection of 0.2 ml three times per week (M, W, F) for a final level of 10 mg/kg body weight. Control mice were injected with phosphate buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

VEGF-165 and Bevacizumab Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amount of proteins extracted from bEnd.3 cells treated of VEGF-165 (20 ng/mL; Cell Signaling) with or without bevacizumab (0.3 mg/mL; Genentech) was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Then, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies. Primary antibodies were used as follows: zona occludens-1 (ZO-1; Invitrogen) and anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich). Then, the membranes were incubated with species-specific and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo) for 1 hour. The visualization of bands was performed with ECL solution (Daeillab) and ImageQuant LAS4000 system (GE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Retinal Microvascular Changes in Diabetic Retinopathy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred and five eyes (65 patients) with 28 eyes from 19 healthy, aged-matched controls, 14 eyes from 9 diabetics without DR and 63 eyes from 37 diabetics with varying levels of DR without diabetic macular edema (DME), as indicated by their ongoing clinical care, were identified for the study from a vitreoretinal referral practice. Diabetics with varying levels of DR without DME and healthy, normal, age-matched controls without ocular or systemic diseases were imaged. Diabetic eyes with DME that would affect the quantitative metrics of the central 3×3 mm scan pattern were not included in this study due to potential segmentation errors which could impact OCTA measurements of the superficial retinal capillary layer (SRL) and deep retinal capillary layer (DRL). Eyes previously treated with non-central, focal laser therapy greater than 6 months prior were allowed to be included. Several of the included eyes were concurrently undergoing or had previous treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections including bevacizumab (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA), aflibercept (Regeneron, Tarrytown, NJ, USA), or ranibizumab (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA). All eyes, however, were well-controlled without signs of active DME or vitreous hemorrhage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Management of Recurrent Macular Edema

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macular edema was defined as a CMT ≥ 300 μm based on the ETDRS protocol, which involved segmentation of the macula into a central circle, inner ring, and outer ring of 1-, 3-, and 6-mm diameters. The CMT was measured by calculating the average retinal thickness in a circle of 1 mm diameter centered on the fovea, and measuring the distance between the first signal from the vitreoretinal interface and the outer border of the retinal pigment epithelium. Recurrence of ME was defined as the reappearance of ME in eyes with previously resolved ME (CMT < 300 μm).
Macular edema was treated with as-needed intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, bevacizumab (1.25 mg; Avastin, Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA) or ranibizumab (Lucentis, 0.5 mg; Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). If three consecutive monthly anti-VEGF injections failed to resolve ME, the patient was switched to intravitreal dexamethasone implant or triamcinolone acetonide injections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Retrospective Anti-VEGF Study for DME

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was a retrospective multi-center study involving multiple eye clinics in the Australian states of South Australia and Tasmania. All participants were enrolled through the Tasmanian Ophthalmic Biobank Study (University of Tasmania) or the Genetic Risk Factors in Complications of Diabetes Study (Flinders University). The eligibility criteria included T1 and T2 DM patients ≥18 years who had received any intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (Aflibercept, Regeneron; Bevacizumab, Genentech; Ranibizumab, Novartis) between 2013 and 2020 for the treatment of DME. DME cases were defined as those with clinically diagnosed center-involving DME and confirmed by central macular thickness (CMT ≥ 315 microns) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Eyes with cysts in the central 1000 microns or any intraretinal or subretinal fluid were included in this study, independent of the CMT parameter. Exclusion criteria were: (a) any vitreoretinal surgery, systemic anti-VEGF therapy, or intra-ocular steroid in the six months preceding the initiation of anti-VEGF injection, (b) insufficient visibility of the fundus for retinal diagnosis, (c) incomplete follow-up data, and (d) inability to give consent. The better responding eye was included as the study eye for patients receiving bilateral anti-VEGF injections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Anti-VEGF Therapies in Ovarian Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments involving human and murine cell lines were performed on 8-12 week old female athymic nude and 4-6 week old female C57/Bl6 mice, respectively, obtained from Taconic Farms (Hudson, NY). All experiments were done in accordance to protocols approved by MD Anderson Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Tumor cells were injected intraperitoneally (1x 106 cells/mouse for IG10, OVCAR432, and OVCAR5) into mice in all groups on day 0. The patient-derived cell line MDA-HGSC-1 (2414) was injected intraperitoneally as ascites, after being grown in NOD-SCID mice. Nude mice were treated with anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg, twice weekly, intraperitoneal injection, while C57/Bl6 mice were treated with murine monoclonal VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 antibody, B20, 5 mg/kg, twice weekly, intraperitoneal injections (Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA). AC708 was given 90 mg/kg, daily oral gavage. 2G2 was administered once weekly via intraperitoneal injection at a dose of 30 mg/kg. Paclitaxel 4 mg/kg once weekly, intraperitoneal injection was given to nude mice. Treatment for therapy experiments began 7 days after injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating anti-angiogenic drug effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VEGF (specifically, VEGF165 isoform, which shares amino acid sequences between human and canine species [44 (link)]), a key mediator of angiogenesis; the RTK inhibitor SU5416; and the selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). The anti-VEGF drug, bevacizumab, was kindly supported by Genentech Inc. (San Francisco, USA).
All drugs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), stored at −20 °C and diluted in the corresponding fresh culture medium immediately before use.
Cultured IPC-366 and SUM149 cells were divided into a control group, treated with DMSO (final concentration, <0.1%), and four experimental groups, in which different concentrations of the different drugs tested were added to the culture medium.
To determine the sensitivity of IPC-366 and SUM149 cells to the effects of VEGF, SU5416, bevacizumab and celecoxib, different concentrations were used to determine the critical final concentrations to be used in the MTS assay.
For in vitro treatments, IPC-366 and SUM149 cells were exposed to 0.62, 1.25 and 2.5 uM concentrations of VEGF. SU5416, bevacizumab and celecoxib at 1.5, 3 and 6 uM final concentrations were added to the culture medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bevacizumab-Loaded Polymer Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (Resomer® RG 505, Mw = 54,000–69,000 g/mol) 50:50 and poly(l-lactide) (Resomer® L 207 S, Mw = 200,000–250,000 g/mol) were obtained from Evonik Industries (Essen, Germany), whereas poly(ε-caprolactone) (Mn = 80,000 g/mol), poly(vinyl alcohol) (Mw = 30,000–70,000 g/mol), and a solution of penicillin/streptomycin for cell culture were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Ethyl acetate and chloroform, that were used as solvents to dissolve the polymers, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (high glucose with L-glutamine and sodium pyruvate) (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin, and Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) were purchased from Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA) was kindly offered by the pharmacy of Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. The QuantumMicroProtein bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Micro BCA) (Euroclone, Pero, Italy) was used in order to quantify BEV for the encapsulation efficiency and for the in vitro release studies. CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS) for cell viability studies was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Formulation and Evaluation of Targeted Nanotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visudyne® (liposomal Verteporfin, BPD-MA) was a kind gift from QLT Inc. (Vancouver, BC, Canada). BPD-MA (Verteporfin) was purchased from VWR. Bevacizumab (Avastin®) was purchased from Genentech (San Francisco, CA). AlexaFlour488 or AlexaFlour680 were used to label Bevacizumab and Slow Fade® Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI was purchased from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California). 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), Cholesterol and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethyleneglycol)-2000(DSPE-mPEG-2000), 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (chloride salt) (DOTAP) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). Dialysis was carried out in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) without calcium or magnesium at pH 7.4 using Float-A-Lyzer® G2, MWCO=300 kD (Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA). Human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell line AsPC-1 was purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) and maintenance media, RPMI 1640 (Roswell Park Memorial Institute), fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin with 0.5% EDTA and PBS were purchased from Mediatech, Inc (Manassas, VA). For in vivo studies, nude mice, 8 wks old weighing ~20g, were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Inc (Wilmington, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Anti-VEGF Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA) as well as aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY, USA) were purchased. Recombinant human VEGF-A (rhVEGF-A) proteins and recombinant rat VEGF 164 were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Rabbit VEGF-A 165 was produced at West Bioscience Research (Irvine, CA, USA). A biotin-SP-AffiniPure goat anti-human IgG F(ab 0 )2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) was used to detect Ranibizumab. bevacizumab was detected using a biotin-SP-AffiniPure goat anti-human IgG (HþL) (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Aflibercept was detected using a biotinylated-SP-conjugated affinity-purified goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Fcc) (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Abicipar was detected using either a biotinylated antibiologic antibody, followed by fluorescently labeled streptavidin (Jackson ImmunoResearch) or a fluorescently conjugated, affinity-purified mouse anti-PEG monoclonal IgM (ANP Tech, Newark, DE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!