The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3t magnetom trio tim

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The 3T MAGNETOM Trio Tim is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system manufactured by Siemens. It operates at a magnetic field strength of 3 Tesla, which enables high-quality imaging of the human body.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

32 protocols using 3t magnetom trio tim

1

Multimodal Neuroimaging Protocol for Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1 MEMPRAGE images were acquired on Siemens 3T Magnetom Tim Trio scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12 channel head coil. Flip angle: 7 degrees. TI: 1.1s, TE:1.5 / 3.4 / 5.2 / 7.0. TR 2.2s. 144 slices, slice thickness: 1.2mm. Acquisition time: 2:12. Rest: T2* BOLD epfid2d1_72 sequence, Siemens 3T Magnetom Tim Trio, 12 channel head coil. Flip angle: 85 degrees. TE: 30ms, TR: 3.0s, 47 slices, slice thickness: 3mm. Acquisition time: 6:12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Acquisition of Multimodal MRI Dataset

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acquisition parameters for the MSC dataset have been fully described elsewhere (Gordon et al., 2017). In brief high-resolution T1-weighted (224 slices, isotropic 0.8 mm3 voxels, TE = 3.74 ms, TR = 2400 ms, TI = 1000 ms, flip angle = 8°), T2-weighted, and BOLD data (both task and rest; gradient-echo EPI sequence, isotropic 4 mm3 voxels, TE = 27 ms, and TR = 2200 ms, whole brain acquisition) were collected on a Siemens 3T Magnetom Tim Trio with a 12-channel head coil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Atrial Fibrosis in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients #1, 7, 8, and 10 underwent DE‐CMR using 0.2 mmol/kg gadolinium contrast agent and a 3T MAGNETOM Tim Trio or Prisma (Siemens Healthineers) at 0.625×0.625×1.25 mm3 or 0.885 mm3 (Patient #1) resolution. Visualization of the endocardial wall was aided by magnetic resonance angiography, a preceding scan with gadolinium enhanced blood pool. The epicardial wall was then segmented by hand in Amira (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Atrial fibrosis was defined as exceeding an atrial wall/blood pool intensity ratio of >1.0 to 1.2, with atrial fibrosis exceeding a patient‐specific ratio in accordance with previously published atrial fibrosis quantification studies using a similar method.25, 26 A 1x1cm2 region, spanning the thickness of the wall, at the driver site and the surrounding 1×1 cm2 regions composing a 3×3 cm2 grid were individually segmented and fibrosis content quantified. These 9 driver regions were compared with 111 randomly selected 1×1 cm2 regions outside the driver region within the same atrial chamber for each patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Neuroimaging Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were recorded continuously (600 Hz sampling rate, DC-100 Hz low-pass filter, third-order spatial gradient noise cancellation), using a 151 channel CTF system (MISL Ltd., Canada) in a magnetically shielded room located at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. Head position within the MEG dewar was determined by the use of three localization coils placed at the nasion and left and right pre-auricular points and measured before and after each run. Conditions with head movements greater than 5 mm are systematically re-run; however, this was not necessary in this study. To co-register MEG data with anatomical images, the 3 localization coils were replaced with MRI-visible contrast markers, and a structural magnetic resonance image (MRI) was obtained from each participant. These images were acquired using T1-weighted MRI scans covering the whole brain (3D MPRAGE (Sag; FOV = 192×240×256 mm; 1 mm iso voxels; TR/TE/TI/FA = 2300/2.96/900/9, GRAPPA = 2) on a 3T MAGNETOM Tim Trio (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel head coil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Acquisition of Multimodal MRI Dataset

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acquisition parameters for the MSC dataset have been fully described elsewhere (Gordon et al., 2017). In brief high-resolution T1-weighted (224 slices, isotropic 0.8 mm3 voxels, TE = 3.74 ms, TR = 2400 ms, TI = 1000 ms, flip angle = 8°), T2-weighted, and BOLD data (both task and rest; gradient-echo EPI sequence, isotropic 4 mm3 voxels, TE = 27 ms, and TR = 2200 ms, whole brain acquisition) were collected on a Siemens 3T Magnetom Tim Trio with a 12-channel head coil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal MRI protocol for deep neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution T1-weighted (224 slices, 0.8 mm3 isotropic resolution, TE = 3.74 ms, TR = 2,400 ms, TI = 1,000 ms, flip angle = 8 degrees), T2-weighted (224 slices, 0.8 mm3 isotropic resolution, TE = 479 ms, TR = 3,200 ms) both with 0.8 isotropic resolution, and resting-state BOLD data were collected on a Siemens 3T Magnetom Tim Trio with a 12-channel head coil (Gordon et al., 2017 (link)). Functional scans were collected with a gradient-echo EPI sequence, isotropic 4-mm3 voxels, TE of 27 ms, and TR of 2,200 ms (Gordon et al., 2017 (link)). The MSC dataset is considered a deep (precision) dataset with 5 hours of resting-state data per subject in 30-min blocks over 10 separate sessions (Gordon et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Functional and Structural Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Functional and structural images were collected using a Siemens 3T Magnetom TIM Trio. A high resolution anatomical image covering the entire brain was acquired using an axial 3D MPRAGE sequence, parallel to the AC-PC line (TE/TI/TR = 3.29 ms/900 ms/2200 ms, flip angle = 9°, 1 mm3 voxel, 192 axial slices, matrix size = 256 × 192). Functional images were acquired while participants completed a card guessing task (described below) using a gradient echo EPI sequence that covered 37 axial (AC/PC aligned) slices encompassing the cerebrum and most of the cerebellum (TR/TE = 2000/28 ms, FOV = 200 × 200, matrix = 64 × 64, flip angle = 90°; 3.1 mm3, 0 mm gap).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Brain Imaging of Card Guessing Task

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Functional and structural images were collected using a Siemens 3T Magnetom TIM Trio. A high resolution anatomical image covering the entire brain was acquired using an axial 3D MPRAGE sequence, parallel to the AC-PC line (TE/TI/TR = 3.29 ms/900 ms/2200 ms, flip angle = 9°, 1 mm3 voxel, 192 axial slices, matrix size = 256 × 192). Functional images were acquired while participants completed a card guessing task (described below) using a gradient echo EPI sequence that covered 37 axial (AC/PC aligned) slices encompassing the cerebrum and most of the cerebellum (TR/TE = 2000/28 ms, FOV = 200 × 200, matrix= 64 × 64, flip angle = 90°; 3.1 mm3, 0 mm gap).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Resting-state MEG Acquisition and MRI Coregistration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five minutes of resting-state MEG data were acquired in supine position using a CTF 151-channel system (CTF-MISL, Coquitlam, Canada) positioned within a magnetically shielded room (MSR). Participants were instructed to fixate on a centrally positioned gray cross (+) within a circle on a black background, back projected onto a screen inside the MSR. Data were acquired at a sampling frequency of 600 Hz operating in third-order synthetic gradiometry configuration. Prior to acquisition, participants were fitted with three head position indicator coils, located at the nasion and left and right preauricular points. These coils were tracked continuously, enabling a moment-to-moment measurement of head motion. The location of these coils was recorded, and MRI-visible markers positioned at these locations to coregister between MEG and MRI data.
An anatomical T1-weighted image was also acquired for all participants using a 3T Magnetom Tim Trio (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) MRI system using a 12-channel head coil running an MPRAGE pulse sequence (TR = 2,300 ms; TE = 2.9 ms; flip angle = 9°; field of view = 240 × 256 × 192 mm; slice thickness 1 mm3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multi-Modal MRI Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were acquired using a Siemens 3T MAGNETOM Tim Trio scanner (Siemens AG, Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). High-resolution T1-weighted anatomical images were collected using a multi-echo MPRAGE pulse sequence (repetition time [TR] = 2.53 s; echo time [TE] = 1.64, 3.5, 5.36, 7.22 ms, flip angle α = 7°, field of view [FOV] = 256 mm, matrix = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 1 mm, 176 near-axial slices, acceleration factor = 3, 32 reference lines). Task-based functional data were collected using a T2*-weighted echo planar imaging (EPI) pulse sequence sensitive to blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) contrast (TR = 2 s, TE = 30 ms, α = 90°, FOV = 192 mm, matrix = 64 × 64, slice thickness = 3 mm, slice gap = 0.6 mm, 32 near-axial slices). Resting-state functional data were also collected using a T2*-weighted EPI sequence (TR = 6 s, TE = 30 ms, α = 90°, FOV = 256 mm, matrix = 128 × 128, slice thickness = 2 mm, 67 near-axial slices). Resting data were acquired at higher resolution (2 mm isotropic) to reduce the relative influence of physiological noise (Triantafyllou et al. 2005 (link), 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!