The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

81 protocols using dntp mix

1

ISSR-Based Morphospecies Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We tested a total of 24 different ISSR markers. The selection of markers for this study was based on the identification of a particular band profile to facilitate the identification of each morphospecies, in addition to presenting good resolution and a high number of bands. Two ISSR markers were retained for our study: (AG)8Y and (GA)8C (Table 2).
PCR amplifications were performed in 15 μl reaction volume containing ~20 ng of template DNA, 1.5 μl 5X Green Buffer (Promega), 200 μM dNTP (dNTP mix; Promega), 3 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 1 μM of primer (Integrated DNA Technologies), and 1.25 U GoTaq Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega); finally, the volume was adjusted with ultrapure water. Amplifications were conducted in a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad™): initial denaturation step at 94°C for 4 min, 39 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing temperature (Ta) 54°C or 56°C depending on the ISSR primer (Table 2), extension temperature at 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. DNA banding patterns were visualized by electrophoresis, performed with 3 μl of amplified products on a 2% agarose gel using 1X TAE buffer and post-staining with GelRed™ (Biotium), at 110 V for 2 h. A 100 bp DNA Ladder (Promega) was used to estimate amplification product lengths. Fragment (band) patterns were visualized and digitized using an imaging system (PhotoDoc-it, UVP®).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Allele-Specific Primer Design for SNP Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each polymorphic variant identified in coding regions of the sequenced candidate genes, a set of allele-specific primers, with GC tail of unequal length attached to their 5′ end, were designed using the Primer3 software (Koressaar and Remm, 2007 (link); Untergasser et al., 2012 (link)), according to melting temperature (Tm)-shift SNP genotyping method developed by Wang et al. (2005) (link). Fragments were amplified by PCR on an Eppendorf Mastercycler using a volume of 20-μl master-mix containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of dNTP Mix (Promega), 0.15 μM of each primer, 1X EvaGreen™ (Biotium, Fremont, CA, United States), 20 ng of genomic DNA, 1X Taq buffer, and 0.1 μl Taq1 polymerase (Promega) under the following profile: 94°C for 2 min, then 38 cycles of denaturation at 92°C for 20 s, annealing for 20 s (i.e., the temperature was specific to each primer trio), extension at 72°C for 20 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The melting point analysis for the allele determination of the template DNA was performed with a fluorescence-detecting thermocycler (LightCycler™ 4890 Instrument II, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with EvaGreen™ Fluorescent Dye (Biotium). The fluorescent detection profile was for 1 min at 95°C, and the melting curve step was ramping from 65 to 95°C in increments of 1°C for every 20 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was isolated from extracted cells using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and quantified with a ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Evolution 500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY).
The first strand of complementary DNA was synthesized from 1 mg of RNA with oligo-dT primers, M-MLV reverse transcriptase, dNTP mix, RNasin, and nucleasefree water (all reagents from Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out using the SensiFAST SYBR Fluorescein Kit (Bioline, Singapore). The PCR amplification and measurement were conducted in an iQ5 PCR machine (Bio-rad, Singapore) for 2 minutes of denaturation at 958C, and 40 cycles of denaturation at 958C for 10 seconds, and annealing/extension at 608C for 30 seconds. All gene primers used in this study are listed in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex PCR for Mite Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All designed primer pairs were tested with DNA from individual mites and mass of mites. The PCR reagent concentrations were the same for all singleplex PCR tested, with a final volume of 10 μl containing 10 ng of DNA, 1 × enzyme buffer (Promega), 200 μM dNTP mix, 0.5 μM of each primer (Integrated DNA Technologies), 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.8 U of Taq DNA Polymerase (Promega). All singleplex PCR reactions included negative controls, using water as the template. The PCR cycle conditions were empirically adjusted until obtaining optimal results for all prime pairs (Table 1).
As larger PCR products were generated, primer pair numbers 3, 6 and 8, for B. tropicalis, D. pteronyssinus, and G. malaysiensis, respectively (Table 1), were selected to compose the mPCR. The reaction was carried out as in singleplex PCR, using 100 ng of DNA. All mPCR reactions included positive (DNA extracted from individual mites) and negative controls (water as the template). The mPCR and singleplex PCR products were visualized in 1% agarose gel stained with SYBR (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression in Mouse Lungs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identical lobes of the right lungs from 4-5 individual mice per group per time point were isolated and immediately put into RNA lysis buffer. Total RNA was isolated using the commercial SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega). Reverse transcription of mRNA was performed using oligo(dT) primers, dNTP mix, M-MLV RT and RNasin® (Promega). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR) of cDNA was performed using qPCRmix-HS SYBR (Evrogen) and cfx-96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad). The following primers were used:
Relative expression levels were calculated by normalizing levels for genes of interest to that of hprt using the 2–ΔΔCt method.
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPadPrism7 software. Representative data from one of two identical experiments are displayed, except survival curves for which combined results from two independent experiments were summarized. The log-rank test for survival and One- or Two-way Anova with Tukey post-test for multiple comparison for other experiments were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Apoptosis Induction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was bought from MP Biomedicals, USA. Keratinocyte-SFM medium, RPMI 1640 medium, penicillin, streptomycin, fetal bovine serum and l-glutamine were purchased from GIBCO, Invitrogen, USA. Annexin V-Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen™) and Flow Cytometry Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection Kit were bought from BD™ MitoScreen, Becton–Dickinson Biosciences, USA. Camptothecin (CPT) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA. Ammonium acetate was bought from Merck, Germany. Chloroform was bought from R&M Chemicals, UK. Phenol and Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were procured from Amresco, USA. Isoamyl alchohol was purchased from Fluka, Switzerland. Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase was procured from Finnzymes, Finland. PCR primers were from First Base Laboratories. QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit and QIAquick Nucleotide Removal Kit were bought from QIAGEN, Germany. DNA Polymerase I Large (Klenow) Fragment, restriction enzymes and T4 DNA Ligase were obtained from New England Biolabs (NEB), USA. dNTP mix was purchased from Promega, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from tissue samples was isolated using the High Pure FFPET RNA Isolation Kit (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For cDNA synthesis, a reaction mix containing 2 µg of pure total RNA, 1 U of RNase inhibitor (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 0.04 µg/µL of random primers (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 2 mM of dNTP mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 10 U of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase (M-MLV RT) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), in a total reaction volume of 20 µL, was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and stored at −20 °C until use. For cDNA amplification, 25 µL-reaction mixtures containing 12.5 µL of 2X GoTaq® G2 Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 0.5 µL of 20 µM forward and reverse primers (specific for BARF1 and HPV16 E6 transcripts), 10.5 µL of RNase-free water (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), and 1 µL of cDNA were prepared. Endogenous β-actin mRNA levels were used for normalization of RNA expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Kcns1 Expression in DRG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were killed with an overdose of pentobarbital, perfused with 10 mL PBS and their lumbar DRG dissected and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using a hybrid method of phenol extraction (TRIzol; Invitrogen Carlsbad, CA) and column purification (RNeasy Microkit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), including DNase treatment to prevent genomic contamination. After purification, the RNA was eluted with RNase-free water, and its concentration and purity estimated with a NanoDrop ND-100 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). First strand cDNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase, reaction buffer, DTT (all from Invitrogen), random primers, and dNTP mix (Promega), according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Three different sets of exon-spanning primers were used to quantify Kcns1 levels in DRG using standard qRT-PCR: ex1-2: 5′F-tggagaccaatacagttgtaggtaa, 5′R-tggacaagcttggatttggga; ex2-3: 5′F-gagccaccgtggacatttgg, 5′R-acgacagtgtgcctcccttg; ex3-4: 5′F-tagtgcaagtgttccgcctc, 5′R-cctcacggtagctgtgcttg. All primers were assessed for their efficiency and specificity, and the ddCT method was used with ywhaz (5′F-agtcgtacaaagacagcacgctaa, 5′R-aggcagacaaaggttggaagg) and gapdh (5′f-aggtcggtgtgaacggatttg, 5′r-tgtagaccatgtagttgaggtca) as housekeepers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DRG Transcriptional Profiling in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were sacrificed with an overdose of pentobarbital, perfused with 10 ml PBS and their lumbar DRG dissected and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using a hybrid method of phenol extraction (TRIzol; Invitrogen) and column purification (RNeasy Microkit; Qiagen), including DNase treatment to prevent genomic contamination. After purification, the RNA was eluted with RNase-free water, and its concentration and purity estimated with a NanoDrop ND-100 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). First strand cDNA was reverse-transcribed using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase, reaction buffer, DTT (all from Invitrogen), random primers and dNTP mix (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Three different sets of exon-spanning primers were used to quantify Kcns1 levels in DRG using standard qRT-PCR: ex1-2: 5’F-tggagaccaatacagttgtaggtaa, 5’R- tggacaagcttggatttggga; ex2-3: 5’F-gagccaccgtggacatttgg, 5’R- acgacagtgtgcctcccttg; ex3-4: 5’F-tagtgcaagtgttccgcctc, 5’R-cctcacggtagctgtgcttg. All primers were assessed for their efficiency and specificity, and the ddCT method was used with ywhaz (5’F-agtcgtacaaagacagcacgctaa, 5’R-aggcagacaaaggttggaagg) and gapdh (5’f-aggtcggtgtgaacggatttg, 5’r-tgtagaccatgtagttgaggtca) as housekeepers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Generating Spike-in Controls for TAB-seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TAB-seq protocol was performed using the commercial kit provided by WiseGene. To monitor the conversion rate, we added spike-in hmC, mC and unmethylated C controls, created by amplifying PCR products with a 5-hmC dNTP mix (Zymo Research), 5-mC dNTP mix (NEB) or dNTP mix (Invitrogen). To generate the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine spike-in control, we followed the protocol described by Yu et al. (41 (link)). Generation of unmethylated and 5-methylcytosine spike-in controls was performed using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases (Thermo) with a total volume of 50 μl (10 μl of 5x Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases buffer, 1 μl of Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases, 1 μl of 10 mM 5-methylcytosine or cytosine dNTP mix, 50 ng of unmethylated lambda DNA (PROMEGA), 2 μl of 10 μM of forward and 2 μl of 10 μM of reverse primers and up to 50 μl of nuclease free PCR grade H20). Thermal cycling conditions were step 1: 95°C for 10 min, step 2: 95°C for 30 s, step 3: 60°C for 30 s, step 4: 72°C for 30 s, step 5: go to step 2, repeat 42 times, step 6: 72°C for 10 min and step 7: 4°C indefinitely. After the PCR amplification, all spike-in controls were subjected to gel extraction to eliminate the template DNA. The primer sequences we used for the spike-in controls are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!