The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dr a1

Manufactured by Atago
Sourced in Japan

The DR-A1 is a laboratory instrument designed for the accurate and consistent measurement of various samples. It features advanced digital technology to provide reliable results. The core function of the DR-A1 is to perform precise analyses, but its specific intended use should not be extrapolated or interpreted beyond the available factual information.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using dr a1

1

Tomato Soluble Solids and Acidity Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of total soluble solids was determined from five fresh fruit samples at room temperature using an Atago DR-A1 digital refractometer (Atago Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) by the previously reported method [2 (link)]. TA content was determined by titration of water extract of each sample with 0.1 N NaOH solution as citric acid equivalents per gram (μg CAE/g). Briefly, one hundred milligrams of lyophilized tomato pulp with skin were extracted with 10 mL of distilled water by sonication three times for 10 min each. The extract was centrifuged at 5700× g at room temperature for 10 min, and supernatant was filtered with a 0.45 μm filter. The pH value of the filtrate with the volume of 5 mL was adjusted with 0.1 N NaOH solution to pH 8.1 using a pH meter (Orion Star™ A211 pH Benchtop Meter, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). BAR was obtained by dividing the TSS value by the TA value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Fruit Quality: TSS and TA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total soluble solids (TSS) were determined for each sample fruit in two replications using an Atago DR-A1digital refractometer (Atago Co. Ld.,Tokyo, Japan) at 20 • C and expressed as • Brix.
Titratable acidity (TA) was detected by titrating 5 mL of tomato juice with 0.1 N NaOH up to pH 8.1 with a pH meter (HANNA Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA). The result was expressed as grams of citric acid per 100 g of fresh weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Carrot Sample pH and Soluble Solids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH was measured (room temperature) in the homogenised carrot samples in distilled water (1:1, w:v) using a pH meter (Crison Micro pH 2001, Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain). The soluble solids content (SSC), expressed as °Brix, was measured from the previous homogenate using a digital refractometer (DR-A1, ATAGO Co Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a thermostatic water bath set at 20 °C. One measurement per sample replicate was made for each determination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

pH and Soluble Solids Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH was determined using the pH meter model MW102 with MA 920 electrodes (Milwaukee, Sat Baciu, Romania). The soluble solids (SS) content, in °Brix, was obtained with an ‘Abbe’ digital refractometer, model DR-A1 (ATAGO Co., Bellevue, WA, USA), at 22 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Juice Quality Determination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH and soluble solids content (SSC, %) of freshly prepared juice were determined using a pH meter (Crison Micro pH 2001, Crison Instruments, Spain) and a digital refractometer (DR-A1, ATAGO Co Ltd., Japan), respectively. Titrable acidity (TA) was determined by titrating the freshly prepared juice with 0.1 N NaOH to an endpoint of pH 8.2 using a Mettler Toledo DL21 automatic titrator. Results were expressed as the mass equivalent (g) of citric acid per 100 mL of juice (g.100 mL -1 ). The pH, SSC and TA determinations were carried out in 15 mL juice triplicates for each sample type and the average values considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Juice Quality Determination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH and soluble solids content (SSC, %) of freshly prepared juice were determined using a pH meter (Crison Micro pH 2001, Crison Instruments, Spain) and a digital refractometer (DR-A1, ATAGO Co Ltd., Japan), respectively. Titrable acidity (TA) was determined by titrating the freshly prepared juice with 0.1 N NaOH to an endpoint of pH 8.2 using a Mettler Toledo DL21 automatic titrator. Results were expressed as the mass equivalent (g) of citric acid per 100 mL of juice (g.100 mL -1 ). The pH, SSC and TA determinations were carried out in 15 mL juice triplicates for each sample type and the average values considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Density, Viscosity, and Refractive Index of Hybrid Solvents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Densities were measured using a density tube meter, the viscosities were measured with a Brooksfield DV2T viscometer. This viscometer was calibrated with distilled water. Viscosity of the samples (η) was obtained under the following conditions; the flow time of 60 s was used to measure the flow time in the hybrid solvents or solvent, T = 303 K and a speed of 50 rpm. The estimated uncertainty of the experimental viscosity was ± 0.02 cP. The refractive index was measured with a digital refractometer (ATAGO DRA1, Japan) with an uncertainty of ± 0.001.
The analytical balance (AND, GR202, Japan) with the precision of ± 0.0001 g was used for the preparation of mixtures in molar basis. The studied hybrid solvents were prepared in well-sealed glass vials to avoid contamination or mixture evaporation. Measurements were done continually after the mixtures preparation. The standard uncertainty of solubility is 0.0014 and density is 0.001 g/cm3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Physicochemical Analysis of Freshly Prepared Juice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For pH and SSC (%) of freshly prepared juice, we employed a pH meter (Crison Micro pH 2001, Crison Instruments, Spain) and a digital refractometer (DR-A1, ATAGO Co Ltd., Japan), respectively. Titrable acidity (TA) was determined by titrating the freshly prepared juice with 0.1 N NaOH to an endpoint of pH 8.1 using a Mettler Toledo DL21 automatic titrator and expressed as the mass equivalent (g) of citric acid per 100 mL of juice (g.100 mL -1 ). The maturation index was calculated as the ratio between SSC and TA. The pH, SSC and TA determinations were carried out in 10 g triplicates for each sample type and the average values considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Physicochemical Characterization of Grape Juice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proximate composition was determined using the methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC 1990) [33 ]. This included moisture content (Method N° 934.06), total crude protein (Method N° 960.52), lipid content (Method N° 960.39), and crude ash (Method N° 923.03). The total carbohydrate content was estimated by the difference. Physicochemical characteristics of the samples were measured, including pH with a pH-meter (Orion Star A320, Thermo Scientific Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA), titratable acidity expressed as gram tartaric acid per 100 mL of GJ, soluble solid content (°Brix) measured with an Abbé refractometer (DR-A1, Atago, Tokyo, Japan), and the surface color measured with a colorimeter (HunterLab, MiniScanTM XE Plus, Reston, VA, USA). The total color difference (ΔE) was calculated using Equation (1).
E=[(L*L0*)2+(a*a0*)2+(b*b0*)2]
where L* is the lightness of the sample, L0* is the lightness of the fresh sample, a* is the redness of the sample, a0* is the redness of the fresh sample, b* is the yellowness of the sample, and b0* is the yellowness of the fresh sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optimizing Cell Culture Media Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optimal concentration of KM and FA for treating HCECs was decided based on the result of the CCK-8 test; finally, KM1 and FA100 were supplemented in the buffer solution (BS). The chemical composition of BS is based on the balance salt solution (BSS PLUS®) for further animal studies. The pH and osmolarity of BS and herbal combination were determined using a pH meter (pH 510; Eutech Instruments, Singapore) and a micro-osmometer (Model 3320; Advanced Instruments, Norwood, MA, USA). A refractometer (DR-A1 ATAGO, Kyoto, Japan) was used to measure the refractive index (RI) of the solution. The BSS PLUS® is composed by two aliquots: solution (A) with NaCl (3.571 g), KCl (0.189), Na2HPO4 (0.207) and NaHCO3 (1.051) in 480 mL; and solution (B) with CaCl2, MgCl2⋅6H2O, detrose, and glutathione in 20 mL [42 ]. Solutions A and B were freshly prepared before use; they were preservative-free and aseptic after filtration through a 0.22-µm filter. Afterwards, both solutions were mixed before use and abbreviated as BS for further animal testing in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!