The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

111 protocols using coreldraw

1

Quantifying Cell Colocalization in Retina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis, the labeled sections were examined with an Axio Imager.M2 equipped with an ApoTome.2 module or a Laser Scanning Microscope 710 with corresponding imaging modules (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). Images were acquired using a 20 × (0.8 NA, Apochromat) or a 63 × (1.4 NA oil immersion, Plan Apochromat) objective (both Carl Zeiss AG) as stacks of multiple optical sections and projections were calculated with ZEN blue or ZEN black software (Carl Zeiss AG). Images were adjusted for contrast and brightness using Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) and arranged using CorelDRAW (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, ON, Canada). For quantifying the colocalization experiments, three animals of each genotype were analyzed. Per animal, three images were acquired at different regions of the retina and cell counting was performed using ZEN blue (Carl Zeiss AG). Cell numbers were summarized in Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and graphs were created using GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Graphs and images were arranged using CorelDRAW (Corel Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological and Proteomic Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histology and immunohistochemistry data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analyses (two-tailed t test) and graphing of the histological data were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 8; www.graphpad.com, San Diego, CA, USA) software. For proteomic analysis, grey values (i.e. fluorescence intensity) of gel spots were analysed using the unpaired t test (within Delta 2D software). Significant differences between CPZ and Ctrl groups were considered when p < 0.05. Image processing software CorelDRAW (version 2019; CorelDRAW.com">www.CorelDRAW.com, Canada) was used for image assembly in each figure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Imaging and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All figures were composed using CorelDraw (ver.24) and graphs were obtained in Prism (GraphPad, ver 9). Microscopy images were all obtained in an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope and processed with Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics) for optimization of image brightness and contrast. Frequently we used a high gaussian filter to increase sharpness. Electromyography and force traces were imported from Spike 2 into CorelDraw and the points changed from square to circular.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescence Microscopy for Enteric Neuron Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparations were examined on a Nikon Eclipse Ni microscope equipped with the appropriate filter cubes to distinguish the fluorochromes employed. The images were recorded with a Nikon DS-Qi1Nc digital camera and NIS Elements software BR 4.20.01 (Nikon Instruments Europe BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Enteric neuron counts were performed at ×40 magnification. Slight adjustments to contrast and brightness were made using Corel Photo Paint, whereas the figure panels were prepared using Corel Draw (Corel Photo Paint and Corel Draw, Ottawa, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MALDI-FTMS Figure Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the production of MALDI-FTMS figures, mass spectral traces were calibrated and exported from the Boston University Data Analysis (BUDA) program and then labeled in CorelDRAW (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey HSD tests (p = 0.05) using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0. Microsoft Office, OriginPro 2020, and Corel Draw were used to calculate and produce the graphs and figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Neural Spike and Burst Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary data analysis to extract spike times, spike and burst frequencies, and voltage trajectory measures was performed using Spike2 and programs written in its script language. Secondary analyses, statistical tests, and plots were generated in SigmaPlot (version 12.0, Systat Software). Statistical tests used were One Way (1W) or Two Way (2W) Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RM-ANOVA), with subsequent Holm–Sidak post hoc comparisons, or Friedman Repeated Measures ANOVA on Ranks (RM-Rank-ANOVA), with subsequent Tukey post hoc comparisons. Significance was assumed at p < 0.05, and is indicated as (p < 0.05), ∗∗ (p < 0.01), and ∗∗∗ (p < 0.001). Error bars indicate Standard Error of Means. Figures were produced in CorelDRAW (versions X7 and X8, Corel) and Canvas (version 11, ACD Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Heart Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryosections of the heart auricle tissue or cultivated cells were fixed for 20 min using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), washed and permeabilized in PBS with TritonX-100 (tissue: 0.2%, cells: 0.02%, Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) and supplemented with 5% goat serum for 30 min. The applied primary antibodies were diluted in PBS as followed: mouse anti-Nestin 1:200 (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), rabbit anti-S100B 1:500 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), rabbit anti-α-actinin (Cell-Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), mouse anti Connexin 43 (Millipore). They were applied for 1 h (cells) or for 2 h (sections), both at room temperature (RT). After three washing steps, secondary fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (Alexa 555 anti-mouse or Alexa 488 anti-rabbit, Invitrogen, Life Technologies GmbH, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were applied for 1 h at RT with a dilution ratio of 1:300. Nuclear staining was realized by incubation with 4,6-diamidin-2-phenylindol (DAPI) (1 μg/mL, Applichem) in PBS for 15 min at RT. Finally, the samples were mounted with Mowiol (self-made). Imaging was performed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM 780, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and image processing was executed with ImageJ and CorelDRAW [25 (link)] (open source and Corel Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were taken using the LSM 700 (Carl Zeiss) confocal microscope, LCI Plan-Neofluar 63×/1.30 glycerol immersion objective at room temperature, and Zen Black acquisition software (Carl Zeiss AG). Image analysis was done using the Zen Blue Lite (Carl Zeiss), PHOTO-PAINT and CorelDraw programs from the CorelDraw Graphics Suite 2017. Postimaging processing was done using Corel PHOTO-PAINT 2017 using the brightness/contrast/intensity adjustment settings equally for images from the same imaging series.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Gastric Neuroendocrine Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens were examined using a Nikon Eclipse Ni microscope and images were taken using a Nikon DS-Qi1Nc digital camera and NIS Elements software BR 4.20.01 (Nikon Instruments Europe BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Minor adjustments to contrast and brightness were made using Corel Photo Paint, while figure panels were prepared using Corel Draw (Corel Photo Paint and Corel Draw, Ottawa, ON, Canada). The 20× objective was used for morphometric evaluation. In the gastric mucosa, the area occupied by OPs-IR in 4.1 mm2 (0.410 × 10 fields) was measured by binarization (described above). In addition, the number of GHR, NPY and SOM IRs in 4.1 mm2 were counted in the gastric mucosa.
For each experimental group (CTR, BP 5% and BP 10%), the values obtained for OPs-IR area and the number of EECs were corporate and the means were calculated. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (Graph Prism 4, GraphPad Software version 4.01, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The experimental group was considered as the main effect. In addition, the means were then separated using the Tukey-HSD test. A p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!