The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Myovation

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

Myovation is a laboratory equipment product designed for muscle function analysis. It provides objective and quantitative measurements of muscle contractile properties. The core function of Myovation is to assess and evaluate muscle performance and characteristics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using myovation

1

Cardiac Tissue Fixation and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Under deep isoflurane-inhalation anesthesia, each intact heart was rapidly removed from the chest and flushed with warmed isotonic saline. Once the heart was rinsed, it was weighed and instantaneously placed in 60cc of 10% buffered formalin (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA) to induce tissue fixation at a contraction state. All hearts of this study were approximately in the same state of contraction as confirmed by measurements of the mean ventricular wall thickness (Omann et al., 2019 (link)). The whole-body weight before excision was also recorded. The period between harvest and imaging was approximately 1 week, following the advice on cardiac specimen preparation by Giannakidis et al. (2016a (link)). Before euthanasia, and as part of a separate study (Hernandez et al., 2013 (link)), the living rats were imaged using a small animal PET/CT scanner (Inveon dedicated PET docked with CT in the multi-modality platform; Siemens Medical Solutions) and the 18F-FDHROL radiotracer to evaluate the left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF). EF was measured using the clinical cardiac software Myovation designed for the Xeleris workstation (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiac Imaging Protocol Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From 15O-water, LV volumes and LVEF were calculated from VB and FP images using blood-pool gated SPECT (BPGS), a program based on Myovation (GE Healthcare) and QBS (Cedars Sinai). Gated transaxial VB and FP images were imported into the application on a Xeleris workstation for automatic segmentation and quantification. QBS provides three different methods for calculation of LV volumes and LVEF: surface- (s), count- (c) and volume-based (v) methods. The results from all three methods were used for comparison.
From MRI, LV volumes and LVEF were calculated using ViewForum (Philips). The endocardial contour was manually traced in end-diastole and in end-systole. The most basal slices had to show at least 50% visible myocardial circumference to be included. The LV outflow tract was included in the endocardial contour using the aortic valve as the lateral border. The papillary muscles and trabeculae were included in the blood volume. Stroke volume (SV) was calculated as EDV-ESV and LVEF as SV/EDV expressed as a percentage. All 15O-water-based LV volumes and LVEF calculations were performed by a medical physicist (JN), and for assessment of inter-operator repeatability, calculations were also performed by an experienced nuclear medicine physician (TK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The noncorrected and motion-corrected images were reconstructed by applying an iterative dedicated reconstruction algorithm with maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (Myovation, Xeleris 3.1, GE Healthcare). The use of dedicated software (Make SA and Fil3DBatch, Xeleris 3.1, GE healthcare) allowed to reconstruct both the noncorrected and motion-corrected images using the exact same alignment and masking, excluding possible reproducibility errors.16 (link)
Each image was automatically normalized to the maximum peak activity and the 17-segmental uptake values were presented as the percentage of the maximum myocardial regional uptake. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) was automatically calculated for all scans (Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS) 2009, Sedar Senai). TPD is defined as the percentage of segments below the predefined uniform average deviation threshold, as explained in detail by Berman et al.20 (link) Scans were displayed in the traditional short, vertical long, and horizontal long axes and reviewed using a color scale.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Canine PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) scanning was performed in the anesthetized dogs in the supine position on a movable table top, with the head fixed inside the scanner (Philips Gemini GXL 16, Philips Medical System (USA) Inc., Netherlands). The PET scanner has sixteen detector rings, generating four main slices and three cross-slices, with a thickness of approximately 2 mm. Sensitivity was 675 cps/kBq/mL for the main slices and 945 cps/kBq/mL for the cross-slices, and the spatial resolution was 8 mm. The axial range was 81 mm. We used an image matrix of 512×512 pixels with a pixel size of 1.44×1.44 mm2. All animals had been fasted for at least 8 h before starting PET/computed tomography (CT) examination and remained under anesthesia throughout the entire experiment. 18F-flurpiridaz was administered by hand as a bolus injection into the femoral vein and flushed with 5-mL saline solution (injection time of 5 s). The protocol was repeated at baseline (before cardiac arrest), and 4 h after ROSC. Results were quantitatively analyzed using Myovation (GE Healthcare, USA) and QGS/QPS software (Cedars Quantitative Perfusion SPECT, Version 4.0, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Myocardial PET Quantification Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET data were analysed using a commercially available software package (Myovation, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) on a dedicated imaging workstation (Xeleris 3, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Polar maps were normalized to 100 % peak activity and the segmental relative radiotracer uptake was computed using a 20-segment model for the left ventricle [18] . The effect of CT AC may vary substantially among different myocardial regions owing to anatomical nonuniformity or misalignment, as demonstrated by Ficaro et al. [19] and Lautamäki et al. [20] . In order to assess such variations among myocardial regions we also assigned the 20 segments of the left ventricular myocardium to five regions of the left ventricle for regional comparison: apex (segments 19 and 20), anterior (segments 1, 2, 7, 8, 13 and 14), septal (segments 3, 9 and 15), lateral (segments 5, 6, 11, 12, 17 and 18) and inferior (segments 4, 10 and 16) [21] . Analysis was performed with CT AC and repeated with MR AC (with and without TOF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!