The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pdxl 2 analysis software

Manufactured by Rigaku

PDXL-2 is a powder diffraction analysis software developed by Rigaku. It provides comprehensive data processing and interpretation capabilities for X-ray powder diffraction experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using pdxl 2 analysis software

1

Thermal and Structural Analysis of Polyurethane Foam Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermogravimetric and differential thermal analyses (DTA) of the polyurethane foam were performed at a heating rate of either 2 or 55ºC per minute to determine the temperature range for thermal decomposition of the polymeric scaffold (Q600 DTA/TGA, TA Instruments). Differential thermal analyses were further performed on the powdered glass under nitrogen gas flow to determine glass transition and crystallization temperatures as a function of heating rate. Analyses were performed at 2, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 55 °C/min. up to 1100°C. Aluminum oxide (99.99%) served as reference standard. Glasses or glass-ceramics were analyzed by x-ray diffraction (XRD) on powdered scaffolds. Scans were performed in the two-theta range 10–90° (40 kV; 44 mA) in Bragg-Brentano configuration (SmartLab, Rigaku Americas). Where applicable, peak positions were determined using PDXL-2 analysis software (Rigaku Corporation). Peak position was calibrated using silicon powder standard (NIST, 640d).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Ceramic Scaffold Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scaffold macrostructural features were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi S-4800 field emission SEM) on sintered scaffolds. Specimens were sputter-coated with gold prior to SEM examination. Mean pore diameter and strut thickness were measured on digital micrographs (n = 4 per group) using publicly available image analysis software (NIH Image J 1.48v [26 (link)]).
The mean density of the porous scaffolds (ρscaffold) was calculated from the measured mass and volume of the sintered cylinders (n = 10). The bulk density of the scaffold struts (ρsolid) (n = 10) was determined by helium pycnometry (AccuPyc II 1340, Micromeritics). The porosity p of the scaffolds was calculated using the following equation:
p=1ρscaffoldρsolid
The crystalline phases present after sintering were analyzed by x-ray diffraction (XRD) on powdered scaffolds. Scans were performed in the two-theta range 10–90° (40 kV; 44 mA) in Bragg-Brentano configuration (SmartLab, Rigaku Americas). Peak position was calibrated using silicon powder standard (NIST, 640d). XRD patterns were analyzed using PDXL-2 analysis software (Rigaku Corporation). Additional scans were performed in grazing incidence (GIXRD) on bulk glass-ceramic pellets to determine the nature of surface crystalline phases (omega incidence angle of 3 degrees in parallel beam optics configuration).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thermal and Structural Analysis of Crystalline Phases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential thermal analyses were performed on powdered specimens under
nitrogen gas flow to determine glass transition and crystallization temperatures
(Q600 DTA/TGA, TA Instruments). Specimens were powdered using an agate mortar
and pestle. Analyses were performed at a heating rate of 40 °C/min. up
to 1100°C. Aluminum oxide (99.99%) powder served as reference
standard. Disc-shaped specimens were cut from the ingots and heat treated at
temperatures ranging from 775 to 900°C for one hour at a heating rate of
2°C per minute. This temperature range was selected according to the DTA
results. Crystalline phases were characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD) on
powdered specimens. Scans were performed in the two-theta range
10–90°, at 40 kV and 44 mA in Bragg-Brentano configuration
(SmartLab, Rigaku Americas, Inc.). Peak positions were determined using PDXL-2
analysis software (Rigaku Corporation) after calibration using silicon powder
standard (NIST, 640d). Lattice parameters were determined by Rietveld
refinement41 –43 and compared to published
values and powder diffraction files to assess the amount of strontium
incorporated in each crystalline phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterizing Ceramic Scaffold Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scaffold macrostructural features were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi S-4800 field emission SEM) on sintered scaffolds. Specimens were sputter-coated with gold prior to SEM examination. Mean pore diameter and strut thickness were measured on digital micrographs (n = 4 per group) using publicly available image analysis software (NIH Image J 1.48v [26 (link)]).
The mean density of the porous scaffolds (ρscaffold) was calculated from the measured mass and volume of the sintered cylinders (n = 10). The bulk density of the scaffold struts (ρsolid) (n = 10) was determined by helium pycnometry (AccuPyc II 1340, Micromeritics). The porosity p of the scaffolds was calculated using the following equation:
p=1ρscaffoldρsolid
The crystalline phases present after sintering were analyzed by x-ray diffraction (XRD) on powdered scaffolds. Scans were performed in the two-theta range 10–90° (40 kV; 44 mA) in Bragg-Brentano configuration (SmartLab, Rigaku Americas). Peak position was calibrated using silicon powder standard (NIST, 640d). XRD patterns were analyzed using PDXL-2 analysis software (Rigaku Corporation). Additional scans were performed in grazing incidence (GIXRD) on bulk glass-ceramic pellets to determine the nature of surface crystalline phases (omega incidence angle of 3 degrees in parallel beam optics configuration).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!