The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using parvalbumin

1

Immunocytochemical Analysis of DRG Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult DRG were dissected and collected in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) on ice and digested according to standard procedures. Cultures were maintained in medium containing B27 and penicillin–streptomycin in DMEM:F12. Cells were plated on coated glass coverslips (0.01 mg ml−1PDL) for 48-72 h and fixed with 4% PFA–4% sucrose. Immunocytochemistry was performed by incubating fixed cells with Cdkl5 (Sigma HPA002847), βIII-tubulin (Abcam ab18207), CaMKIIα (Thermo-Fisher MA1-048), (Abcam ab81887), Parvalbumin (Abcam ab555), GFP (Thermo-Fisher A-6455), HA (Abcam ab18181) antibodies at 4 °C overnight. This was followed by incubation with AlexaFluor-conjugated goat secondary antibodies according to standard protocols (Invitrogen). All cells were counterstained with Hoechst (Molecular Probes).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining of Zebrafish Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Larvae were briefly sedated on ice and fixed (4% paraformaldehyde, 4% sucrose, 150 μM CaCl2 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) for 5 h at 4°C. Larvae were then permeabilized in ice-cold acetone, blocked (2% goat serum, 1% bovine serum albumin, 1% DMSO in PBS), and incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer. The following commercial primary antibodies were used in this study: GFP (1:500; Aves Labs, Inc; Cat# GFP-1020), Parvalbumin (1:2,000; Thermo Fisher; Cat# PA1-933), Parvalbumin (1:2,000; Abcam; Cat# ab11427), Parvalbumin (1:500; Sigma-Aldrich; Cat# P3088), MAGUK (K28/86; 1:500; NeuroMab, UC Davis; Cat# 75-029), CtBP (1:2,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-55502. Custom affinity-purified antibody generated against Danio rerio Ribeye b was also used (mouse IgG2a; 1:2,000; Sheets et al., 2011 (link)). Following primary antibody incubation, larvae were washed and incubated with diluted secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, Alexa Fluor 546, Dylight 549, Alexa Fluor 555, and Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen). Larvae were then counterstained with DAPI (Sigma) and mounted on slides with elvanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Aquaporin 5 and Parvalbumin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins (40 μg) were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, blocked with 5% non-fat milk, probed with primary antibodies against aquaporin 5 (AQP5) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) and parvalbumin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) at 4 °C overnight, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were then visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. ß-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) and GAPDH (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was used as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemistry of Synaptic Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was carried out as described in detail previously (Singer et al., 2016 (link)). Antibodies against C-terminal-binding protein 2 (CtBP2)/RIBEYE (rabbit, diluted 1:750; ARP American Research Products, Inc.™, Waltham, MA, USA) to detect ribbons (Khimich et al., 2005 (link)), neurofilament 200 (NF-200, mouse, 1:3,000; Sigma-Adlrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), parvalbumin (PV, rabbit, diluted 1:2,000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Synaptobrevin 2 (mouse, diluted 1:200; Synaptic Systems, GmbH, Berlin, Germany), and desmin (mouse, diluted 1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used. Primary antibodies were detected using appropriate Cy3 (1:1,500, Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) or Alexa488 (1:500, Invitrogen Molecular Probes, Paisley, UK) secondary antibodies.
All samples were viewed as previously described (Zampini et al., 2010 (link)) using an Olympus BX61 microscope (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany), equipped with epifluorescence illumination and analyzed with CellSens Dimension software (OSIS GmbH, Münster, Germany). To increase spatial resolution, the slices were imaged over a distance of 15 μm within an image stack along the z-axis (z-stack), followed by 3-dimensional deconvolution using CellSens Dimension's built-in algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Formononetin and Cisplatin Neuroprotective Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formononetin was obtained from Selleck Chemicals Company (Houston, TX, USA; S2299). Cisplatin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA, Cat. No. P4394). The following primary antibodies were used in this study: myosin-VIIa (Proteus Biosciences, Ramona, CA, USA; 25–6790), parvalbumin (Abcam, UK; ab277625), cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA; 9661S), caspase-3 (CST, 9662S), Bax (CST, 2772S), Bcl-2 (CST, 3498S), PI3K (CST, 4249S), phospho-PI3K (CST, 17366S), AKT (CST, 4691S), phospho-AKT (CST, 4060S), and Nrf2 (CST, 12721S). MitoSOX RED (Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA, M36008) and LY294002 (Selleck, S1105) were also utilized in the experimental procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cochlear Explants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The treated cochlear explants underwent a 30‐min fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, pH 7.4) in PBS. Cochlear explants were then permeabilized with 1% Triton X‐100 in PBS (PBST, 30 min) and blocked with 10% donkey serum in PBST (1 h). The tested primary antibodies were directed against parvalbumin (1:500, Abcam), myosin 7a (1:500, Proteus Biosciences), cleaved caspase‐3 (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology), and TUJ‐1 (1:1000, Biolegend). Incubation with the diluted primary antibodies was performed overnight at 4°C, followed by three PBS washes and then incubation with corresponding fluorescent secondary antibodies. 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma) counterstaining was carried out for 10 min at room temperature, and fluorescence was observed under a Leica SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Retinal Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retinal immunohistochemistry was performed as described by Song et al.25 (link) Briefly, eyes were fixed, cryoprotected, embedded, and snap-frozen in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc., Torrance, CA), and cryo-sectioned at 14-µm thickness. Cryo-sections were blocked in blocking buffer and incubated with anti-GFP (mouse, 1:1000;, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), or Calbindin (mouse, 1:2000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), or Parvalbumin (rabbit, 1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), or Brn3a (mouse, 1:100; EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA), or Glutamine synthetase (GS, mouse, 1:1000; EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA) primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, and then incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies either conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 568 (1:1000; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR). Retinal nuclei were counterstained with DAPI and sections were mounted in Fluoro-Gel buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) for imaging. The images were generated and analyzed by the Nikon C2 confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with NIS-elements AR software, and further edited using Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA). The same imaging setting (without post-processing using Photoshop) was used only for comparison of retinal GFP expression between ECVM-treated and control groups (i.e. Figs. 2A, 2B, Figs. 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Neuronal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain tissues were homogenized in the sample lysis buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 2 % SDS, 0.5 % NP-40, 5 mM EDTA) plus the protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Protein samples (15-30 µg/lane) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Memb-ranes were probed with antibodies directed against phosphotyrosine (1:1000, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), ErbB4 (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Alter-natively, immunoblots were probed with antibodies directed against excitatory and inhibitory neuronal markers GluA1 (1:500, Millipore), GluA2/3 (1:1000, Millipore), GluA4 (1:1000, Millipore), GluN1 (1:1000, Millipore), GluN2A (1:500, Millipore), GluN2B (1: 500, Millipore), GluN2C (1:500, Millipore), GluN2D (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GAD65/67 (1:1000, Millipore), parvalbumin (1:3000, Abcam, Cambridge UK), tyrosine hydroxylase (1:1000, Millipore) neuregulin-1 (1:300, RandD Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and β-actin (1:2000, Millipore). Immunoreactivity on membranes was detected by peroxidase-conjugated anti-immunoglobulin antibodies followed by chemiluminescence reaction (ECL kit, GE Healthcare) and film exposure. The intensity of an immunoreactive band, whose size matched the authentic molecular weight, was measured by an image processing software, GENETOOLS (Syngene, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemistry of Neuronal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following commercial antibodies were used in this study: GFP (1:500; Aves Labs, Inc; Cat# GFP-1020), Parvalbumin (1:2000; Thermo Fisher; Cat# PA1-933), Parvalbumin (1:2000; Abcam; Cat# ab11427), Parvalbumin (1:500; Sigma-Aldrich; Cat# P3088), MAGUK (K28/86; 1:500; NeuroMab, UC Davis; Cat# 75–029), Otoferlin (1:500; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank/ HCS-1). Custom affinity-purified antibody generated against Danio rerio Ribeye b (mouse IgG2a; 1:2000; Sheets et al., 2011 (link)) was also used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!