The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using anti keratin 10

1

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies from this study were as follows: anti-keratin-10, anti-loricrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-E2F1, anti-p63, anti-ATR, anti-p-ATR, anti-CHK1, anti-p-CHK1, anti-CHK2, anti-p-CHK2, anti-RAD51, anti-Mre11, anti-NBS1, anti-BRCA1, and anti-BRCA2 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); anti-p73 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); anti-p53 (Millipore, Burlington, MA); anti-p-TopBP1 (Abgent, San Diego, CA). AKT inhibitors MK2206 (2μM) and LY294002 (25μM) were purchased from SelleckChem (Houston, TX). Cell lysates were processed and assayed by western blot analysis as previously described 60 (link). Briefly, J2 feeders were firstly removed by Versene (PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA) treatment and keratinocytes were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer on ice for 30 minutes. The samples were then electrophoresed on SDS-page gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. At last the membranes were developed using ECL prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA) and chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak x-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Keratin 10 Levels by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysate harvesting and western blot analysis was performed as previously described [57 (link)]. To quantify the levels of keratin 10 (K10), insoluble cell pellets obtained from RIPA-SDS lysis were resuspended in 8 M urea, 10% β-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM PMSF, and incubated at room temperature while rotating for 30 min, as described previously [90 (link)]. The insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm at 4’C. Primary antibodies used: anti-SETD2 (Kind gift from Dr. Brian Strahl, Epicypher), anti-H3K36me3, anti-cyclin B, anti-CDK2 (Abcam), anti-H3.1 (Active Motif), p84 (GeneTex), anti-Involucrin, anti-keratin 10, anti-CDC25C, anti-cyclin A, anti-cyclin E and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz), anti-CDK1, anti-RPA32 (Bethyl laboratories) and anti-Flag (Sigma). Secondary antibodies used were horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit (Cell Signaling Technology) and HRP-conjugated anti-mouse (GE Life Sciences). Western blots were developed using Clarity Western ECL blotting substrate (Bio-Rad). Images were captured on either autoradiography film or Biorad ChemidocMP imaging system. Blots were analyzed with Biorad Imagelab 5.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies from this study were as follows: anti-keratin-10, anti-loricrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-E2F1, anti-p63, anti-ATR, anti-p-ATR, anti-CHK1, anti-p-CHK1, anti-CHK2, anti-p-CHK2, anti-RAD51, anti-Mre11, anti-NBS1, anti-BRCA1, and anti-BRCA2 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); anti-p73 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); anti-p53 (Millipore, Burlington, MA); anti-p-TopBP1 (Abgent, San Diego, CA). AKT inhibitors MK2206 (2μM) and LY294002 (25μM) were purchased from SelleckChem (Houston, TX). Cell lysates were processed and assayed by western blot analysis as previously described 60 (link). Briefly, J2 feeders were firstly removed by Versene (PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA) treatment and keratinocytes were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer on ice for 30 minutes. The samples were then electrophoresed on SDS-page gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. At last the membranes were developed using ECL prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA) and chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak x-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!