The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using miniprep kit

1

qPCR Primer Design and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All primers for qPCR were designed using BatchPrimer3 v1.0 based on the target genes annotated in the latest cod genome assembly gadMor2 (Table S8) (14 (link)). Target genes were validated using thermal gradient RT-PCR and the products that met the quality criteria were cloned into bacterial plasmids. Two micrograms of cDNA were used as a template for PCR with gene-specific primers. Target mRNAs were amplified using MyTaq HS DNA Polymerases (Bioline, UK), and amplicons were run on 1% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and purified with NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR Clean-up (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Purified PCR products were ligated in pGEM-T easy vectors (Promega, USA) and transformed into Escherichia coli (DH5a strain). One selected transformant of each construct was grown to obtain plasmid DNA (Miniprep kit, Macherey-Nagel). All constructs were verified by Sanger DNA sequencing with T7 and SP6 primer sets (GATC Biotech, Table S8). Pro-inflammatory cytokines mRNAs for il1b and il6 were selected on account of their high inducibility during PAMP responses (Figure S7). See details for PCR program and reaction systems in supplementary Information. One-way ANOVA was used to test the statistical differences between indicated experimental contrast. Significance was reported if P < 0.05. Graphs were plotted using Prism6® (Table S5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Relative Plasmid Copy Number Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relative plasmid copy numbers were determined based upon fluorescence intensity of agarose gel bands corresponding to linearized plasmid DNA harvested from identical numbers of cells. Three colonies were picked from a fresh transformation and grown to saturation in LB broth containing 100 μg/ml of carbenicillin. The cultures were normalized according to OD600 absorbance in order to start with constant dry weight of cells. Plasmids were prepped from these normalized suspensions using a plasmid miniprep kit (Machery-Nagel, cat. #740499.250) and 10 μl of prep were linearized with the DpnI enzyme, which has a single recognition site on the pGFPuv plasmid. Linear fragments were separated in a 1% agarose gel, stained with Ethidium Bromide, and visualized using a UVP BioSpectrum 300 LM26E transilluminator equipped with a EtBr filter (570–640 nm). The shutter speed was set to 126 ms. Camera aperture and image contrast were adjusted so that none of the fluorescent bands saturated the image. Band intensity was measured by densitometry using Image J software, with fixed area size for all the samples. The results were expressed as fold increase relative to background.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Site-directed Mutagenesis of ϕX174 dsDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ϕX174 dsDNA replicative form was purified from infected cultures before lysis using a standard miniprep kit (Macherey-Nagel), and 500 pg of this DNA were used as template for polymerase chain reaction-based mutagenesis using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and contiguous, divergent, 5’-phosphorylated primers, of which the reverse primer carried the desired nucleotide substitution. Polymerase chain reaction products were circularized with the Rapid DNA ligation kit (Thermo Scientific) and used for transfecting competent IJ1862cells by the classical heat-shock method. A single plaque was picked, resuspended Lysogeny Broth medium, and stored at –70°C. The presence of each substitution was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. This process was iterated until twenty GATC sites were introduced. Full-length sequencing of the 20GATC virus was performed to verify that all mutations were present and that no other changes were introduced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Profiling via NAPPA Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NAPPA arrays were manufactured as previously described22 (link),23 (link). Briefly, bacterial clones having the genes of interest with a GST tag at the c-terminus, were obtained from the DNASU Plasmid Repository (DNASU.org). Plasmid DNA was purified using a mini-prep kit (Macherey–Nagel, #740499.50). DNA concentrations were then measured and normalized to 100 ng/µl for all 1700 genes. Silicon nanowell substrates were coated with (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTS) (Thermo Scientific, #80370) and then the plasmid DNA was printed using a piezo electric printer. At the time of usage, proteins were expressed from plasmid DNA using an in-vitro transcription and translation (IVTT) kit (Thermo Scientific, #88882). The printing quality of a batch was determined by expressing a random slide from the batch with the IVTT kit, followed by the detection of GST-tagged proteins with Mouse anti-GST antibody (Cell Signaling, #2624S) and Alexa 555 Goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Invitrogen, #A-21422).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CRISPR Library Generation in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The library was designed by randomly choosing targets with a proper NGG PAM around the genome of E. coli strain MG1655 (NC_000913.2). A pool of 92,919 oligonucleotides (synthesized by CustomArray) was amplified with primers LC296 and LC297 using the Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) over 18 cycles. The psgRNA backbone was PCR amplified using primers LC293 and LC294. Both the vector backbone and library insert were gel purified, followed by Gibson assembly. To avoid the introduction of bottlenecks in the library, a total of 19 transformation assays were performed each using 0.2 μl of Gibson assembly product and 20 μl of MG1655 electro-competent cells and plated on 12 × 12 cm2 petri dishes resulting in a total of about 107 colonies. Colonies were allowed to grow for only 4–5 h at 37 °C before pooling all the cells together. The plasmid library was then extracted from 5 ml of pooled colonies using a miniprep kit (Macherey-Nagel). The resulting plasmid library DNA was further transferred to strains LC-E18 and LC-E75 by electroporation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generation of Barcoded Plasmid Library

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Barcoded plasmids were generated in (Cira et al., 2018 (link)). To generate the barcoded library in E. coli MG1655, plasmid DNA was extracted from TOP10 E. coli cells (ThermoFisher) with a miniprep kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Macherey-Nagel). Plasmids were transformed into chemically competent E. coli MG1655 cells via heat shock and plated on LB agar plates containing chloramphenicol (35 μg/mL) and ampicillin (100 μg/mL). Colonies were picked, grown separately in LB broth with chloramphenicol (35 μg/mL) and ampicillin (100 μg/mL), and banked as glycerol freezer stocks at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Site-Directed Mutagenesis of nrdJ Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The introduction of mutations for targeted amino acid exchange was performed by Ω-PCR with the QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies). As a template, the expression plasmids pET28b(+) were applied, containing the respective nrdJ gene between the restriction sites NdeI and HindIII (16 , 17 (link)). The mutagenesis was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions from the QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit. The mutagenesis product was transformed into electrocompetent Escherichia coli TOP10. The identity of the variant was confirmed by plasmid preparation (Miniprep kit, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG) and sequencing (Microsynth Seqlab GmbH). Plasmids with the confirmed mutation were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) for recombinant gene expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bacterial Strain Cultivation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the strains and plasmids used in this study are detailed in Dataset S3. Experiments were performed using Muller Hinton II agar or cation adjusted broth (Becton Dickinson) unless specified. Antibiotics were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich and were used at the following concentrations: carbenicillin 100 µg/mL, chloramphenicol 30 µg/mL, nalidixic acid 30 µg/mL, streptomycin 100 µg/mL, rifampicin 100 µg/mL, trimethoprim 2 µg/mL and 16 µg/mL, and tetracycline 15 µg/mL. Cultures were routinely grown at 37 °C with shaking (225 rpm). Plasmids were extracted using a commercial miniprep kit (Macherey-Nagel) and were transformed into TSS competent cells (46 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacterial Expression and Cell Culture Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All bacteria were cultured in Luria–Bertani medium with appropriate antibiotics at 37°C. Plasmids were maintained in E. coli XL-1 Blue (Stratagene, San Diego, CA) and purified using standard miniprep kits (Machery-Nagel, Bethlehem, PA) before transfection. During bacterial expression, GST-fusion proteins were produced in E. coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). Sf9 insect cells were grown in ESF921 medium (Expression Systems, Davis, CA) at 28°C and infected with baculoviruses encoding MBP- or GST-fusion proteins at a multiplicity of infection of ∼1. Cos7, HeLa, and HFF cells were cultured in DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotic-antimycotic (Invitrogen) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Transfections with DNA or RNA used Lipofectamine-LTX or RNAiMAX (Invitrogen), respectively (Campellone et al., 2008 (link)). Control siRNAs, siRNAs to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and siRNA pair #3 to Rab1a+b were from Ambion, and siRNA pairs #1 and 2 to Rab1a+b and siRNAs #1 and 2 to RhoD were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). For selection of HFF clones stably transfected with LAP or LAP-WHAMM, media were supplemented with 750 μg/ml G418. To induce LAP expression, 7.6 mM sodium butyrate was added for 12–18 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification and Characterization of Bacterial Enzymes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ingredients for buffers and media were obtained
from Duchefa Biochemie (Haarlem, The Netherlands) or Merck (Darmstadt,
Germany). All other chemicals used in the experiments, including the
sodium salt of (S,S)-EDDS, fumaric
acid, and succinic acid, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical
Co. (St. Louis, MO) unless stated otherwise. Molecular biology reagents,
including restriction enzymes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reagents,
T4 DNA ligase, and DNA and protein ladders, were obtained from Fermentas
(ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) or Promega Corp. (Madison,
WI). PCR purification, gel extraction, and Miniprep kits were provided
by Macherey-Nagel (Duren, Germany). Ni-Sepharose 6 Fast Flow and prepacked
PD-10 Sephadex G-25 columns were purchased from GE Healthcare Life
Sciences (Uppsala, Sweden). Primers for DNA amplification were synthesized
by Eurofins MWG Operon (Cologne, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!