The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1 306 protocols using su8010

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermogravimetry was implemented on a thermal gravimetric analyzer (TG, Q500, TA) under N2 atmosphere. XRD data was collected on a X-ray diffraction instrument (XRD, TD3500, Tongda) using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) to characterize the crystal structures of the as-prepared sample. The morphology and size of the particles were studied using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi) and a (high resolution) transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100) and an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Hitachi SU8010). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of the samples was determined by a N2 adsorption–desorption method using an Autosorb-iQ automatic specific surface and a porosity analyzer at 77.3 K. The UV-vis absorption spectra were obtained with a Jasco V-650 spectrophotometer. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were analyzed using a Jasco FP-8500 fluorescence spectrometer with a 450 W Xenon lamp as light source. FT-IR spectra of phosphorus were recorded on a Nicolet IS-50 spectrometer with KBr pellet technique from 4000 to 400 cm−1. All measurements were performed at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrochemical Characterization of Electrode Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All electrochemical experiments, including electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and chronoamperometry, were performed on a traditional three-electrode system with a CHI660E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Co, Ltd., Shanghai, China). The system consisted of a 1 mm commercial platinum wire counter electrode, an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and the modified working electrode. The morphologies of the samples were characterized with a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; SU 8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and the elemental composition of the electrode surface was analyzed by an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS; SU 8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) was carried out by the Fourier transform infra-red spectrophotometer (IRAffinity-1S, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies,
microstructures, and compositions were characterized by X-ray diffractometer
(XRD, Shimadzu XRD 6000), field emission scanning electron microscopy
(FESEM, Hitachi-SU8010), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Hitachi-SU8010),
and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ULVAC-PHI PHI 5000 Versaprobe
II). The microstructures of the samples were examined by a Raman spectroscope
(Raman, Horiba Jobin Yvon HR 800 UV) equipped with a laser wavelength
of 632.8 nm. The nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were measured
using a porosimetry analyzer (Micromeritics Tristar II 3020). The
specific surface areas of the samples were determined by using the
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method at 77 K. The micropore
and mesopore volumes were analyzed using the Barrett–Joyner–Helenda
(BJH) method based on the nitrogen isotherm data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Col/Hap Composite Granules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological and chemical properties of the outer surfaces of the two Col/Hap composite granule samples (AI 20 min 5Cy Col/Hap and AI 60 min 5Cy Col/Hap) were examined using SEM (SU8010; Hitachi High-Tech Co., Tokyo, Japan) and EDS (JSM-7100F; Joel Co., Tokyo, Japan) (n = 1) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
The outer and cross-sectional surfaces of three types of dried gelatin-infiltrated granules (Col control + AG, AI 20 min 5Cy Col/Hap + AG and AI 60 min 5Cy Col/Hap + AG) were examined (n = 1 for both) using SEM (SU8010; Hitachi High-Tech Corp., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV after plasma coating with OsO4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Dendritic Ag Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and shape of the Ag nanostructures were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU-8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and the composition of the structures was determined through energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, SU-8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Surface morphology of the dendritic forest-like Ag nanostructures was intensively investigated by an atomic force microscope (AFM, Digital Instruments Dimension 3100, Veeco Instruments Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) in tapping mode where scanned areas were set to (1 × 1) micrometer. Debris were carefully avoided in order to obtain high resolution clear images for further roughness analysis. The roughness of the prepared dendritic forest-like Ag nanostructures was evaluated using a surface profiler (XP-2, Ambios Technologies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). With constant pressure and moving rate, the diamond tip of surface profilomer was scanning cross the surface of specimen to obtain the surface roughness. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was achieved using a diffractometer (D8 Discover, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). High-resolution inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectrometry (Element 2, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure the weight of Ag nanostructures deposited on a Si wafer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Thermal Interface Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological and microstructural properties of the compounds and TIMs were characterized using an optical microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan, SMZ745T) and a high-resolution field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, SU8010). Optical image processing was conducted using the ImageJ software (v1.53e) to analyze the alignment of the metal particles. The size of the EGaIn and Cu particles in toluene was measured using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA, LS 13 320). The selected samples were frozen using liquid nitrogen and shattered to pieces to observe the cross-section of the EGaIn-Cu/PDMS TIMs via SEM. The elemental composition of the EGaIn-Cu/PDMS TIMs was analyzed using energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (Hitachi, SU8010). The thermal conductivity of the TIMs was analyzed at 25 °C under atmospheric pressure in a nitrogen environment, using laser flash analysis (LFA) (Netzsch, Selb, Germany, LFA 467). The mechanical properties of the TIMs were measured using a universal testing machine (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA, E3000LT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Au@Ag-DNFs/Si Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material properties of the synthesized Au@Ag-DNFs/Si were characterized using cold-field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU-8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, SU-8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Discover, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). An ultraviolet (UV)-visible reflection spectrophotometer (UV-3101PC, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a spherical light integrator was used to measure the reflection spectra of the samples. High-performance Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and pore size analyzer (Micro 100C, 3P Instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Odelzhausen, Germany) [43 (link)] was also utilized to measure the multilayer adsorption on the external surface area of various Ag-DNFs/Si samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of NASS Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of NASS and NASS-N samples were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi SU8010, Tokyo, Japan). A small amount of powder was scratched from stainless-based samples. The powder was further mixed with ethanol followed by 15 mins’ ultrasonic dispersion, forming a homogeneous solution for further transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100F, Tokyo, Japan) observation. The crystal structures were tested by an X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku SmartLab 9, Tokyo, Japan) in the 2θ range of 10–70 degree with CuKα (λ = 1.54 Å) radiation. The chemical analysis was evaluated under an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo VG Escalab 250Xi, New York, NY, USA). The elemental compositions and species were studied through an energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS, Hitachi SU8010, Tokyo, Japan) equipped in the same SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Surface Characterization of Functional Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An optical contact angle (CA) meter (JGW‐360A, China) was used to measure the CA of the surface. A scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi SU8010, Japan) and an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Hitachi SU8010, Japan) were used to study the micro structures of the etched surface and the chemical composition of the prepared samples, respectively. The thickness of the functional thin film of these samples was measured by the coating thickness gauge (Fisher MPO, Bad Salzuflen, Germany). The solar and IR reflectivity R(λ) were measured using the UV–Vis–NIR Spectrometer (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) and Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT‐IR, Frontier, PerkinElmer LLC), respectively. The thermal images were taken by an infrared thermal imaging camera (FLIR A615).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Morphological Analysis of GLP Variants by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of GLP, GLP-HV, GLP-H, and GLP-V were analyzed by SEM (SU 8010, Hitachi, Japan) [38 (link)]. These samples were dipped in a small amount of powder with conductive tape and pasted on the sample table. After spraying gold for 30–60 s, the samples were vacuumized and tested on the machine. The images were taken by SU 8010 Hitachi scanning electron microscope and the magnifications were 1000-fold and 200-flod, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!